Enriching Students’ Scientific Thinking Through Relational Reasoning

Seeking Evidence in Texts, Tasks, and Talk

Pricilla Karen Murphy, Carla M. Firetto, Jeffrey A. Greene

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As reflected in the Next Generation Science Standards, concerns about the adequacy of education and career preparation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields have led to fundamental shifts in the focus of K-12 science education. Such shifts are also highlighted in many of the articles within this special issue, and the issue focus on the role of relational reasoning in learning in STEM domains. Within this commentary, we reflect upon how the articles within this special issue align with, and shed new light on, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), specifically with respect to relational reasoning. We then describe a novel pedagogical approach designed to augment students’ acquisition of NGSS practices and core ideas (i.e., Quality Talk Science (QTs)) and how evidence from our research on QTs has shown increases in relational reasoning. In this section, we also provide multiple discourse excerpts that serve as exemplars for each of the four types of relational reasoning (i.e., analogy, anomaly, antinomy, and antithesis). Finally, we present specific exemplars from QTs that reinforce the ideas and findings forwarded by the authors of each of the papers within this special issue and propose some thoughts regarding future directions for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-117
Number of pages13
JournalEducational Psychology Review
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Students
Mathematics
Technology
Education
Research
Learning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{b0cfab2e5edb4fefb78b30fad0fb0625,
title = "Enriching Students’ Scientific Thinking Through Relational Reasoning: Seeking Evidence in Texts, Tasks, and Talk",
abstract = "As reflected in the Next Generation Science Standards, concerns about the adequacy of education and career preparation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields have led to fundamental shifts in the focus of K-12 science education. Such shifts are also highlighted in many of the articles within this special issue, and the issue focus on the role of relational reasoning in learning in STEM domains. Within this commentary, we reflect upon how the articles within this special issue align with, and shed new light on, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), specifically with respect to relational reasoning. We then describe a novel pedagogical approach designed to augment students’ acquisition of NGSS practices and core ideas (i.e., Quality Talk Science (QTs)) and how evidence from our research on QTs has shown increases in relational reasoning. In this section, we also provide multiple discourse excerpts that serve as exemplars for each of the four types of relational reasoning (i.e., analogy, anomaly, antinomy, and antithesis). Finally, we present specific exemplars from QTs that reinforce the ideas and findings forwarded by the authors of each of the papers within this special issue and propose some thoughts regarding future directions for research.",
author = "Murphy, {Pricilla Karen} and Firetto, {Carla M.} and Greene, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10648-016-9387-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "105--117",
journal = "Educational Psychology Review",
issn = "1040-726X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Enriching Students’ Scientific Thinking Through Relational Reasoning : Seeking Evidence in Texts, Tasks, and Talk. / Murphy, Pricilla Karen; Firetto, Carla M.; Greene, Jeffrey A.

In: Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 105-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enriching Students’ Scientific Thinking Through Relational Reasoning

T2 - Seeking Evidence in Texts, Tasks, and Talk

AU - Murphy, Pricilla Karen

AU - Firetto, Carla M.

AU - Greene, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - As reflected in the Next Generation Science Standards, concerns about the adequacy of education and career preparation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields have led to fundamental shifts in the focus of K-12 science education. Such shifts are also highlighted in many of the articles within this special issue, and the issue focus on the role of relational reasoning in learning in STEM domains. Within this commentary, we reflect upon how the articles within this special issue align with, and shed new light on, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), specifically with respect to relational reasoning. We then describe a novel pedagogical approach designed to augment students’ acquisition of NGSS practices and core ideas (i.e., Quality Talk Science (QTs)) and how evidence from our research on QTs has shown increases in relational reasoning. In this section, we also provide multiple discourse excerpts that serve as exemplars for each of the four types of relational reasoning (i.e., analogy, anomaly, antinomy, and antithesis). Finally, we present specific exemplars from QTs that reinforce the ideas and findings forwarded by the authors of each of the papers within this special issue and propose some thoughts regarding future directions for research.

AB - As reflected in the Next Generation Science Standards, concerns about the adequacy of education and career preparation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields have led to fundamental shifts in the focus of K-12 science education. Such shifts are also highlighted in many of the articles within this special issue, and the issue focus on the role of relational reasoning in learning in STEM domains. Within this commentary, we reflect upon how the articles within this special issue align with, and shed new light on, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), specifically with respect to relational reasoning. We then describe a novel pedagogical approach designed to augment students’ acquisition of NGSS practices and core ideas (i.e., Quality Talk Science (QTs)) and how evidence from our research on QTs has shown increases in relational reasoning. In this section, we also provide multiple discourse excerpts that serve as exemplars for each of the four types of relational reasoning (i.e., analogy, anomaly, antinomy, and antithesis). Finally, we present specific exemplars from QTs that reinforce the ideas and findings forwarded by the authors of each of the papers within this special issue and propose some thoughts regarding future directions for research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988934671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988934671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10648-016-9387-x

DO - 10.1007/s10648-016-9387-x

M3 - Review article

VL - 29

SP - 105

EP - 117

JO - Educational Psychology Review

JF - Educational Psychology Review

SN - 1040-726X

IS - 1

ER -