Entelechy and irony in political time

The preemptive rhetoric of Nixon and Obama

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay makes two key arguments. The first is that preemptive politics often rely on strategies of rhetorical irony to cultivate perceptions of reasonableness, humility, and dialectical transcendence. As such, I expand the rhetorical conception of Stephen Skowronek's "political time" thesis to reveal its dimensions as a Burkean "ironic development." The second argument is that Barack Obama's rhetorical strategy more directly fits the typology of preemptive presidents than that of reconstructive presidents, making him far more comparable in "political time" with Richard Nixon than with Ronald Reagan. I proceed to analyze the two presidential candidates' rhetoric in their first winning campaigns for the presidency to discern the extent of these parallels and reveal the applicability of an ironist political style in preemptive electoral situations. The essay concludes by examining the trajectory of liberalism in political time and the implications of this analysis for preemptive "wild cards" in presidential rhetoric.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-96
Number of pages38
JournalRhetoric and Public Affairs
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

irony
rhetoric
Trajectories
president
reasonableness
transcendence
liberalism
typology
candidacy
campaign
politics
time
Rhetoric
Irony
Richard Nixon
Barack Obama

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{1a1ca3dfeaea44f8a91e6b75c55da52a,
title = "Entelechy and irony in political time: The preemptive rhetoric of Nixon and Obama",
abstract = "This essay makes two key arguments. The first is that preemptive politics often rely on strategies of rhetorical irony to cultivate perceptions of reasonableness, humility, and dialectical transcendence. As such, I expand the rhetorical conception of Stephen Skowronek's {"}political time{"} thesis to reveal its dimensions as a Burkean {"}ironic development.{"} The second argument is that Barack Obama's rhetorical strategy more directly fits the typology of preemptive presidents than that of reconstructive presidents, making him far more comparable in {"}political time{"} with Richard Nixon than with Ronald Reagan. I proceed to analyze the two presidential candidates' rhetoric in their first winning campaigns for the presidency to discern the extent of these parallels and reveal the applicability of an ironist political style in preemptive electoral situations. The essay concludes by examining the trajectory of liberalism in political time and the implications of this analysis for preemptive {"}wild cards{"} in presidential rhetoric.",
author = "Michael Steudeman",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/rap.2013.0008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "59--96",
journal = "Rhetoric and Public Affairs",
issn = "1094-8392",
publisher = "Michigan State University",
number = "1",

}

Entelechy and irony in political time : The preemptive rhetoric of Nixon and Obama. / Steudeman, Michael.

In: Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.03.2013, p. 59-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entelechy and irony in political time

T2 - The preemptive rhetoric of Nixon and Obama

AU - Steudeman, Michael

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - This essay makes two key arguments. The first is that preemptive politics often rely on strategies of rhetorical irony to cultivate perceptions of reasonableness, humility, and dialectical transcendence. As such, I expand the rhetorical conception of Stephen Skowronek's "political time" thesis to reveal its dimensions as a Burkean "ironic development." The second argument is that Barack Obama's rhetorical strategy more directly fits the typology of preemptive presidents than that of reconstructive presidents, making him far more comparable in "political time" with Richard Nixon than with Ronald Reagan. I proceed to analyze the two presidential candidates' rhetoric in their first winning campaigns for the presidency to discern the extent of these parallels and reveal the applicability of an ironist political style in preemptive electoral situations. The essay concludes by examining the trajectory of liberalism in political time and the implications of this analysis for preemptive "wild cards" in presidential rhetoric.

AB - This essay makes two key arguments. The first is that preemptive politics often rely on strategies of rhetorical irony to cultivate perceptions of reasonableness, humility, and dialectical transcendence. As such, I expand the rhetorical conception of Stephen Skowronek's "political time" thesis to reveal its dimensions as a Burkean "ironic development." The second argument is that Barack Obama's rhetorical strategy more directly fits the typology of preemptive presidents than that of reconstructive presidents, making him far more comparable in "political time" with Richard Nixon than with Ronald Reagan. I proceed to analyze the two presidential candidates' rhetoric in their first winning campaigns for the presidency to discern the extent of these parallels and reveal the applicability of an ironist political style in preemptive electoral situations. The essay concludes by examining the trajectory of liberalism in political time and the implications of this analysis for preemptive "wild cards" in presidential rhetoric.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875821969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875821969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/rap.2013.0008

DO - 10.1353/rap.2013.0008

M3 - Review article

VL - 16

SP - 59

EP - 96

JO - Rhetoric and Public Affairs

JF - Rhetoric and Public Affairs

SN - 1094-8392

IS - 1

ER -