Epidemiology of talc exposure and ovarian cancer: A critical assessment

Joshua Muscat, Melanie Barish

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Epidemiologic reasoning is based on a progression of scientific studies that begins with a hypothesis and proceeds with hypothesis testing. Subsequently it is necessary to test the validity of observed statistical associations by excluding possible alternative explanations. In the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, there have been several case-control studies that have consistently shown small but increased risks in women using cosmetic talcum powder. These statistical associations have raised concerns that there may be a cause-effect relationship between perineal exposure to talc and ovarian cancer. Currently, such concerns cannot be supported because the validity of these findings has not been evaluated. This paper discusses why the results from all case-control studies could have arisen from inaccuracies in exposure ascertainment, bias, or confounding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-335
Number of pages9
JournalComments on Toxicology
Volume6
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 1 1998

Fingerprint

Talc
Epidemiology
Ovarian Neoplasms
Case-Control Studies
Cosmetics
Testing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Toxicology

Cite this

@article{87d0a3aa74884464b335e8724ba7ed9c,
title = "Epidemiology of talc exposure and ovarian cancer: A critical assessment",
abstract = "Epidemiologic reasoning is based on a progression of scientific studies that begins with a hypothesis and proceeds with hypothesis testing. Subsequently it is necessary to test the validity of observed statistical associations by excluding possible alternative explanations. In the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, there have been several case-control studies that have consistently shown small but increased risks in women using cosmetic talcum powder. These statistical associations have raised concerns that there may be a cause-effect relationship between perineal exposure to talc and ovarian cancer. Currently, such concerns cannot be supported because the validity of these findings has not been evaluated. This paper discusses why the results from all case-control studies could have arisen from inaccuracies in exposure ascertainment, bias, or confounding.",
author = "Joshua Muscat and Melanie Barish",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "327--335",
journal = "Comments on Toxicology",
issn = "0886-5140",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Epidemiology of talc exposure and ovarian cancer : A critical assessment. / Muscat, Joshua; Barish, Melanie.

In: Comments on Toxicology, Vol. 6, No. 5, 01.12.1998, p. 327-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidemiology of talc exposure and ovarian cancer

T2 - A critical assessment

AU - Muscat, Joshua

AU - Barish, Melanie

PY - 1998/12/1

Y1 - 1998/12/1

N2 - Epidemiologic reasoning is based on a progression of scientific studies that begins with a hypothesis and proceeds with hypothesis testing. Subsequently it is necessary to test the validity of observed statistical associations by excluding possible alternative explanations. In the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, there have been several case-control studies that have consistently shown small but increased risks in women using cosmetic talcum powder. These statistical associations have raised concerns that there may be a cause-effect relationship between perineal exposure to talc and ovarian cancer. Currently, such concerns cannot be supported because the validity of these findings has not been evaluated. This paper discusses why the results from all case-control studies could have arisen from inaccuracies in exposure ascertainment, bias, or confounding.

AB - Epidemiologic reasoning is based on a progression of scientific studies that begins with a hypothesis and proceeds with hypothesis testing. Subsequently it is necessary to test the validity of observed statistical associations by excluding possible alternative explanations. In the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, there have been several case-control studies that have consistently shown small but increased risks in women using cosmetic talcum powder. These statistical associations have raised concerns that there may be a cause-effect relationship between perineal exposure to talc and ovarian cancer. Currently, such concerns cannot be supported because the validity of these findings has not been evaluated. This paper discusses why the results from all case-control studies could have arisen from inaccuracies in exposure ascertainment, bias, or confounding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032470639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032470639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0032470639

VL - 6

SP - 327

EP - 335

JO - Comments on Toxicology

JF - Comments on Toxicology

SN - 0886-5140

IS - 5

ER -