Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device

Chin Cheng Pan, Andris Freivalds

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Nursing and personal care is one of the fastest growing but also most injurious U.S. industries. The majority of these injuries is due to patient handling and can be mitigated through the use of various assist devices. One such novel device, the Williamson turn stand, was evaluated and compared to the traditional manual walking belt as well as the more elaborate Hoyer-type lift. Averaged data from 6 healthy subjects across five dependent variables (shoulder EMG, low back EMG, low back compressive force, Borg's rating of perceived exertion and task completion time) indicated that the turn stand was ranked in the middle of the three devices; i.e. it required less effort than the walking belt, but more effort than using a lift device. On the other hand, it was quicker than the lift but not as fast as the purely manual walking belt. Overall the turn stand is an effective patient-handling device for weight-bearing individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium
Pages274
Number of pages1
StatePublished - 2000
EventProceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Jul 29 2000Aug 4 2000

Other

OtherProceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium'
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period7/29/008/4/00

Fingerprint

Ergonomics
ergonomics
nursing
rating
industry
Bearings (structural)
evaluation
Nursing
time
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Pan, C. C., & Freivalds, A. (2000). Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium (pp. 274)
Pan, Chin Cheng ; Freivalds, Andris. / Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium. 2000. pp. 274
@inproceedings{4aa61f978c524489ba2ebcecfd6c4aa7,
title = "Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device",
abstract = "Nursing and personal care is one of the fastest growing but also most injurious U.S. industries. The majority of these injuries is due to patient handling and can be mitigated through the use of various assist devices. One such novel device, the Williamson turn stand, was evaluated and compared to the traditional manual walking belt as well as the more elaborate Hoyer-type lift. Averaged data from 6 healthy subjects across five dependent variables (shoulder EMG, low back EMG, low back compressive force, Borg's rating of perceived exertion and task completion time) indicated that the turn stand was ranked in the middle of the three devices; i.e. it required less effort than the walking belt, but more effort than using a lift device. On the other hand, it was quicker than the lift but not as fast as the purely manual walking belt. Overall the turn stand is an effective patient-handling device for weight-bearing individuals.",
author = "Pan, {Chin Cheng} and Andris Freivalds",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "274",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium",

}

Pan, CC & Freivalds, A 2000, Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device. in Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium. pp. 274, Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States, 7/29/00.

Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device. / Pan, Chin Cheng; Freivalds, Andris.

Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium. 2000. p. 274.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device

AU - Pan, Chin Cheng

AU - Freivalds, Andris

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Nursing and personal care is one of the fastest growing but also most injurious U.S. industries. The majority of these injuries is due to patient handling and can be mitigated through the use of various assist devices. One such novel device, the Williamson turn stand, was evaluated and compared to the traditional manual walking belt as well as the more elaborate Hoyer-type lift. Averaged data from 6 healthy subjects across five dependent variables (shoulder EMG, low back EMG, low back compressive force, Borg's rating of perceived exertion and task completion time) indicated that the turn stand was ranked in the middle of the three devices; i.e. it required less effort than the walking belt, but more effort than using a lift device. On the other hand, it was quicker than the lift but not as fast as the purely manual walking belt. Overall the turn stand is an effective patient-handling device for weight-bearing individuals.

AB - Nursing and personal care is one of the fastest growing but also most injurious U.S. industries. The majority of these injuries is due to patient handling and can be mitigated through the use of various assist devices. One such novel device, the Williamson turn stand, was evaluated and compared to the traditional manual walking belt as well as the more elaborate Hoyer-type lift. Averaged data from 6 healthy subjects across five dependent variables (shoulder EMG, low back EMG, low back compressive force, Borg's rating of perceived exertion and task completion time) indicated that the turn stand was ranked in the middle of the three devices; i.e. it required less effort than the walking belt, but more effort than using a lift device. On the other hand, it was quicker than the lift but not as fast as the purely manual walking belt. Overall the turn stand is an effective patient-handling device for weight-bearing individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842685098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842685098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:1842685098

SP - 274

BT - Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium

ER -

Pan CC, Freivalds A. Ergonomic evaluation of a new patient-handling device. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, Ergonomics for the New Millenium. 2000. p. 274