ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension

Victoria A. Kazmerski, Dawn Blasko, Banchiamlack G. Dessalegn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined individual differences in metaphor processing. In Experiment 1, the subjects judged the literal truth of literal, metaphorical, and scrambled sentences. Overall, metaphors were more difficult to judge as false, in comparison with scrambled controls, suggesting that the metaphorical meaning was being processed automatically. However, there were individual differences in that high-IQ subjects showed more interference. These effects were reflected in ERP amplitude differences at the onset of N400 and after the response. In Experiment 2, the subjects completed IQ tests and a series of working memory tests and then rated and interpreted the same set of metaphors. The results showed that IQ was correlated with working memory capacity and that low-IQ subjects had similar ratings but poorer quality interpretations than did high-IQ subjects. The results were most consistent with a constraint satisfaction approach to metaphor comprehension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)673-689
Number of pages17
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Metaphor
Individuality
Short-Term Memory
Individual Differences
Experiment
Metaphor Comprehension

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{68bcd29be2f94080906f37d3e8dbcb6c,
title = "ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension",
abstract = "In two experiments, we examined individual differences in metaphor processing. In Experiment 1, the subjects judged the literal truth of literal, metaphorical, and scrambled sentences. Overall, metaphors were more difficult to judge as false, in comparison with scrambled controls, suggesting that the metaphorical meaning was being processed automatically. However, there were individual differences in that high-IQ subjects showed more interference. These effects were reflected in ERP amplitude differences at the onset of N400 and after the response. In Experiment 2, the subjects completed IQ tests and a series of working memory tests and then rated and interpreted the same set of metaphors. The results showed that IQ was correlated with working memory capacity and that low-IQ subjects had similar ratings but poorer quality interpretations than did high-IQ subjects. The results were most consistent with a constraint satisfaction approach to metaphor comprehension.",
author = "Kazmerski, {Victoria A.} and Dawn Blasko and Dessalegn, {Banchiamlack G.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "673--689",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. / Kazmerski, Victoria A.; Blasko, Dawn; Dessalegn, Banchiamlack G.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.01.2003, p. 673-689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension

AU - Kazmerski, Victoria A.

AU - Blasko, Dawn

AU - Dessalegn, Banchiamlack G.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - In two experiments, we examined individual differences in metaphor processing. In Experiment 1, the subjects judged the literal truth of literal, metaphorical, and scrambled sentences. Overall, metaphors were more difficult to judge as false, in comparison with scrambled controls, suggesting that the metaphorical meaning was being processed automatically. However, there were individual differences in that high-IQ subjects showed more interference. These effects were reflected in ERP amplitude differences at the onset of N400 and after the response. In Experiment 2, the subjects completed IQ tests and a series of working memory tests and then rated and interpreted the same set of metaphors. The results showed that IQ was correlated with working memory capacity and that low-IQ subjects had similar ratings but poorer quality interpretations than did high-IQ subjects. The results were most consistent with a constraint satisfaction approach to metaphor comprehension.

AB - In two experiments, we examined individual differences in metaphor processing. In Experiment 1, the subjects judged the literal truth of literal, metaphorical, and scrambled sentences. Overall, metaphors were more difficult to judge as false, in comparison with scrambled controls, suggesting that the metaphorical meaning was being processed automatically. However, there were individual differences in that high-IQ subjects showed more interference. These effects were reflected in ERP amplitude differences at the onset of N400 and after the response. In Experiment 2, the subjects completed IQ tests and a series of working memory tests and then rated and interpreted the same set of metaphors. The results showed that IQ was correlated with working memory capacity and that low-IQ subjects had similar ratings but poorer quality interpretations than did high-IQ subjects. The results were most consistent with a constraint satisfaction approach to metaphor comprehension.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041660626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041660626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196107

DO - 10.3758/BF03196107

M3 - Article

C2 - 12956233

AN - SCOPUS:0041660626

VL - 31

SP - 673

EP - 689

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 5

ER -