Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208)

Timothy C. Roth; Anders Brodin; Tom V. Smulders; Lara D. LaDage; Vladimir V. Pravosudov

doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208)

Timothy C. Roth, Anders Brodin, Tom V. Smulders, Lara D. LaDage, Vladimir V. Pravosudov

Division of Mathematics & Natural Sciences (Altoona)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2423
Number of pages	1
Journal	Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume	365
Issue number	1551
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0163
State	Published - Aug 12 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Access to Document

10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

Cite this

Roth, T. C., Brodin, A., Smulders, T. V., LaDage, L. D., & Pravosudov, V. V. (2010). Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1551), 2423. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

Roth, Timothy C. ; Brodin, Anders ; Smulders, Tom V. et al. / Erratum : Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208). In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010 ; Vol. 365, No. 1551. pp. 2423.

@article{f74ec5cbba094d878153a0967344d97b,

title = "Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208)",

author = "Roth, {Timothy C.} and Anders Brodin and Smulders, {Tom V.} and LaDage, {Lara D.} and Pravosudov, {Vladimir V.}",

year = "2010",

month = aug,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1098/rstb.2010.0163",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "365",

pages = "2423",

journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",

issn = "0962-8436",

publisher = "Royal Society of London",

number = "1551",

}

Roth, TC, Brodin, A, Smulders, TV, LaDage, LD & Pravosudov, VV 2010, 'Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208)', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 365, no. 1551, pp. 2423. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

Erratum : Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208). / Roth, Timothy C.; Brodin, Anders; Smulders, Tom V. et al.

In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 365, No. 1551, 12.08.2010, p. 2423.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208)

AU - Roth, Timothy C.

AU - Brodin, Anders

AU - Smulders, Tom V.

AU - LaDage, Lara D.

AU - Pravosudov, Vladimir V.

PY - 2010/8/12

Y1 - 2010/8/12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955737288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955737288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:77955737288

VL - 365

SP - 2423

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1551

ER -

Roth TC, Brodin A, Smulders TV, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV. Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010 Aug 12;365(1551):2423. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0163

Erratum: Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2010) 365 (915-931) DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0208)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this