TY - JOUR
T1 - Error Identification, Disclosure, and Reporting
T2 - Practice Patterns of Three Emergency Medicine Provider Types
AU - Hobgood, Cherri
AU - Xie, Jipan
AU - Weiner, Bryan
AU - Hooker, James
PY - 2004/2
Y1 - 2004/2
N2 - Objectives: To gather preliminary data on how the three major types of emergency medicine (EM) providers, physicians, nurses (RNs), and out-of-hospital personnel (EMTs), differ in error identification, disclosure, and reporting. Methods: A convenience sample of emergency department (ED) providers completed a brief survey designed to evaluate error frequency, disclosure, and reporting practices as well as error-based discussion and educational activities. Results: One hundred sixteen subjects participated: 41 EMTs (35%), 33 RNs (28%) and 42 physicians (36%). Forty-five percent of EMTs, 56% of RNS, and 21% of physicians identified no clinical errors during the preceding year. When errors were identified, physicians learned of them via dialouge with RNs (58%), patients (13%), pharmacy (35%), and attending physicians (35%). For known errors, all providers were equally unlikely to inform the team caring for the patient. Disclosure to patients was limited and varied by provider type (19% EMTs, 23% RNs, and 74% physicians). Disclosure education was rare, with ≤15% of any provider type receiving such instruction. Yet, 59% of physicians had observed another provider disclose an error to a patient. Error discussions are widespread, with all providers indicating they discussed their own as well as the errors of others. Conclusions: This study suggests that error identification, disclosure, and reporting challenge all members of the ED care delivery team. Provider-specific education and enhaned teamwork training will be required to further the transformation of the ED into a high-reliability organization.
AB - Objectives: To gather preliminary data on how the three major types of emergency medicine (EM) providers, physicians, nurses (RNs), and out-of-hospital personnel (EMTs), differ in error identification, disclosure, and reporting. Methods: A convenience sample of emergency department (ED) providers completed a brief survey designed to evaluate error frequency, disclosure, and reporting practices as well as error-based discussion and educational activities. Results: One hundred sixteen subjects participated: 41 EMTs (35%), 33 RNs (28%) and 42 physicians (36%). Forty-five percent of EMTs, 56% of RNS, and 21% of physicians identified no clinical errors during the preceding year. When errors were identified, physicians learned of them via dialouge with RNs (58%), patients (13%), pharmacy (35%), and attending physicians (35%). For known errors, all providers were equally unlikely to inform the team caring for the patient. Disclosure to patients was limited and varied by provider type (19% EMTs, 23% RNs, and 74% physicians). Disclosure education was rare, with ≤15% of any provider type receiving such instruction. Yet, 59% of physicians had observed another provider disclose an error to a patient. Error discussions are widespread, with all providers indicating they discussed their own as well as the errors of others. Conclusions: This study suggests that error identification, disclosure, and reporting challenge all members of the ED care delivery team. Provider-specific education and enhaned teamwork training will be required to further the transformation of the ED into a high-reliability organization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842282699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0842282699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.020
DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 14759966
AN - SCOPUS:0842282699
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 11
SP - 196
EP - 199
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 2
ER -