Essential information: Uncertainty and optimal control of Ebola outbreaks

Shou Li Li, Ottar N. Bjørnstad, Matthew J. Ferrari, Riley Mummah, Michael C. Runge, Christopher J. Fonnesbeck, Michael J. Tildesley, William J.M. Probert, Katriona Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Early resolution of uncertainty during an epidemic outbreak can lead to rapid and efficient decision making, provided that the uncertainty affects prioritization of actions. The wide range in caseload projections for the 2014 Ebola outbreak caused great concern and debate about the utility of models. By coding and running 37 published Ebolamodelswith five candidate interventions, we found that, despite this large variation in caseload projection, the ranking of management options was relatively consistent. Reducing funeral transmission and reducing community transmission were generally ranked as the two best options. Value of information (VoI) analyses show that caseloads could be reduced by 11% by resolving all model-specific uncertainties, with information about model structure accounting for 82% of this reduction and uncertainty about caseload only accounting for 12%. Our study shows that the uncertainty that is of most interest epidemiologically may not be the same as the uncertainty that is most relevant for management. If the goal is to improve management outcomes, then the focus of study should be to identify and resolve those uncertainties that most hinder the choice of an optimal intervention. Our study further shows that simplifying multiple alternative models into a smaller number of relevant groups (here, with shared structure) could streamline the decision-making process and may allow for a better integration of epidemiological modeling and decision making for policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5659-5664
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume114
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - May 30 2017

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Disease Outbreaks
Decision Making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

Li, Shou Li ; Bjørnstad, Ottar N. ; Ferrari, Matthew J. ; Mummah, Riley ; Runge, Michael C. ; Fonnesbeck, Christopher J. ; Tildesley, Michael J. ; Probert, William J.M. ; Shea, Katriona. / Essential information : Uncertainty and optimal control of Ebola outbreaks. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017 ; Vol. 114, No. 22. pp. 5659-5664.
@article{a71ab1b0801e471e961d0d7407946c41,
title = "Essential information: Uncertainty and optimal control of Ebola outbreaks",
abstract = "Early resolution of uncertainty during an epidemic outbreak can lead to rapid and efficient decision making, provided that the uncertainty affects prioritization of actions. The wide range in caseload projections for the 2014 Ebola outbreak caused great concern and debate about the utility of models. By coding and running 37 published Ebolamodelswith five candidate interventions, we found that, despite this large variation in caseload projection, the ranking of management options was relatively consistent. Reducing funeral transmission and reducing community transmission were generally ranked as the two best options. Value of information (VoI) analyses show that caseloads could be reduced by 11{\%} by resolving all model-specific uncertainties, with information about model structure accounting for 82{\%} of this reduction and uncertainty about caseload only accounting for 12{\%}. Our study shows that the uncertainty that is of most interest epidemiologically may not be the same as the uncertainty that is most relevant for management. If the goal is to improve management outcomes, then the focus of study should be to identify and resolve those uncertainties that most hinder the choice of an optimal intervention. Our study further shows that simplifying multiple alternative models into a smaller number of relevant groups (here, with shared structure) could streamline the decision-making process and may allow for a better integration of epidemiological modeling and decision making for policy.",
author = "Li, {Shou Li} and Bj{\o}rnstad, {Ottar N.} and Ferrari, {Matthew J.} and Riley Mummah and Runge, {Michael C.} and Fonnesbeck, {Christopher J.} and Tildesley, {Michael J.} and Probert, {William J.M.} and Katriona Shea",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1617482114",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "5659--5664",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "22",

}

Essential information : Uncertainty and optimal control of Ebola outbreaks. / Li, Shou Li; Bjørnstad, Ottar N.; Ferrari, Matthew J.; Mummah, Riley; Runge, Michael C.; Fonnesbeck, Christopher J.; Tildesley, Michael J.; Probert, William J.M.; Shea, Katriona.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 114, No. 22, 30.05.2017, p. 5659-5664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Essential information

T2 - Uncertainty and optimal control of Ebola outbreaks

AU - Li, Shou Li

AU - Bjørnstad, Ottar N.

AU - Ferrari, Matthew J.

AU - Mummah, Riley

AU - Runge, Michael C.

AU - Fonnesbeck, Christopher J.

AU - Tildesley, Michael J.

AU - Probert, William J.M.

AU - Shea, Katriona

PY - 2017/5/30

Y1 - 2017/5/30

N2 - Early resolution of uncertainty during an epidemic outbreak can lead to rapid and efficient decision making, provided that the uncertainty affects prioritization of actions. The wide range in caseload projections for the 2014 Ebola outbreak caused great concern and debate about the utility of models. By coding and running 37 published Ebolamodelswith five candidate interventions, we found that, despite this large variation in caseload projection, the ranking of management options was relatively consistent. Reducing funeral transmission and reducing community transmission were generally ranked as the two best options. Value of information (VoI) analyses show that caseloads could be reduced by 11% by resolving all model-specific uncertainties, with information about model structure accounting for 82% of this reduction and uncertainty about caseload only accounting for 12%. Our study shows that the uncertainty that is of most interest epidemiologically may not be the same as the uncertainty that is most relevant for management. If the goal is to improve management outcomes, then the focus of study should be to identify and resolve those uncertainties that most hinder the choice of an optimal intervention. Our study further shows that simplifying multiple alternative models into a smaller number of relevant groups (here, with shared structure) could streamline the decision-making process and may allow for a better integration of epidemiological modeling and decision making for policy.

AB - Early resolution of uncertainty during an epidemic outbreak can lead to rapid and efficient decision making, provided that the uncertainty affects prioritization of actions. The wide range in caseload projections for the 2014 Ebola outbreak caused great concern and debate about the utility of models. By coding and running 37 published Ebolamodelswith five candidate interventions, we found that, despite this large variation in caseload projection, the ranking of management options was relatively consistent. Reducing funeral transmission and reducing community transmission were generally ranked as the two best options. Value of information (VoI) analyses show that caseloads could be reduced by 11% by resolving all model-specific uncertainties, with information about model structure accounting for 82% of this reduction and uncertainty about caseload only accounting for 12%. Our study shows that the uncertainty that is of most interest epidemiologically may not be the same as the uncertainty that is most relevant for management. If the goal is to improve management outcomes, then the focus of study should be to identify and resolve those uncertainties that most hinder the choice of an optimal intervention. Our study further shows that simplifying multiple alternative models into a smaller number of relevant groups (here, with shared structure) could streamline the decision-making process and may allow for a better integration of epidemiological modeling and decision making for policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019998791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019998791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1617482114

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1617482114

M3 - Article

C2 - 28507121

AN - SCOPUS:85019998791

VL - 114

SP - 5659

EP - 5664

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 22

ER -