EST clustering error evaluation and correction

Ji Ping Z. Wang, Bruce G. Lindsay, James Leebens-Mack, Liying Cui, Kerr Wall, Webb C. Miller, Claude W. dePamphilis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Motivation: The gene expression intensity information conveyed by (EST) Expressed Sequence Tag data can be used to infer important cDNA library properties, such as gene number and expression patterns. However, EST clustering errors, which often lead to greatly inflated estimates of obtained unique genes, have become a major obstacle in the analyses. The EST clustering error structure, the relationship between clustering error and clustering criteria, and possible error correction methods need to be systematically investigated. Results: We identify and quantify two types of EST clustering error, namely, Type I and II in EST clustering using CAP3 assembling program. A Type I error occurs when ESTs from the same gene do not form a cluster whereas a Type II error occurs when ESTs from distinct genes are falsely clustered together. While the Type II error rate is <1.5% for both 5′ and 3′ EST clustering, the Type I error in the 5′ EST case is ∼10 times higher than the 3′ EST case (30% versus 3%). An over-stringent identity rule, e.g., P ≥ 95%, may even inflate the Type I error in both cases. We demonstrate that ∼80% of the Type I error is due to insufficient overlap among sibling ESTs (ISO error) in 5′ EST clustering. A novel statistical approach is proposed to correct ISO error to provide more accurate estimates of the true gene cluster profile.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2973-2984
Number of pages12
JournalBioinformatics
Volume20
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 22 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computational Mathematics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'EST clustering error evaluation and correction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this