Estimating between- and within-cluster covariate effects, with an application to models of international disputes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Students of international politics often use data in which the covariates vary both within and across units of observation. This is particularly true for dyadic data, which has come to dominate quantitative studies of international conflict, but is also a concern in any work involving a time-series cross-sectional component. Standard regression methods treat both types of covariates as equivalent with respect to their influence on the dependent variable, ignoring possible differences between cross-dyad and within-dyad effects. Here, I discuss the potential pitfalls of this approach, and show how between- and within-dyad effects can be separated and estimated. I then illustrate the approach in the context of a logistic regression, using data on international disputes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-445
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Interactions
Volume27
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

Fingerprint

dyad
international conflict
regression
International Politics
time series
logistics
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{4e01e63fa8fd41229ac6d7ab9e2fbb02,
title = "Estimating between- and within-cluster covariate effects, with an application to models of international disputes",
abstract = "Students of international politics often use data in which the covariates vary both within and across units of observation. This is particularly true for dyadic data, which has come to dominate quantitative studies of international conflict, but is also a concern in any work involving a time-series cross-sectional component. Standard regression methods treat both types of covariates as equivalent with respect to their influence on the dependent variable, ignoring possible differences between cross-dyad and within-dyad effects. Here, I discuss the potential pitfalls of this approach, and show how between- and within-dyad effects can be separated and estimated. I then illustrate the approach in the context of a logistic regression, using data on international disputes.",
author = "Christopher Zorn",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "433--445",
journal = "International Interactions",
issn = "0305-0629",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating between- and within-cluster covariate effects, with an application to models of international disputes

AU - Zorn, Christopher

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Students of international politics often use data in which the covariates vary both within and across units of observation. This is particularly true for dyadic data, which has come to dominate quantitative studies of international conflict, but is also a concern in any work involving a time-series cross-sectional component. Standard regression methods treat both types of covariates as equivalent with respect to their influence on the dependent variable, ignoring possible differences between cross-dyad and within-dyad effects. Here, I discuss the potential pitfalls of this approach, and show how between- and within-dyad effects can be separated and estimated. I then illustrate the approach in the context of a logistic regression, using data on international disputes.

AB - Students of international politics often use data in which the covariates vary both within and across units of observation. This is particularly true for dyadic data, which has come to dominate quantitative studies of international conflict, but is also a concern in any work involving a time-series cross-sectional component. Standard regression methods treat both types of covariates as equivalent with respect to their influence on the dependent variable, ignoring possible differences between cross-dyad and within-dyad effects. Here, I discuss the potential pitfalls of this approach, and show how between- and within-dyad effects can be separated and estimated. I then illustrate the approach in the context of a logistic regression, using data on international disputes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0442303938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0442303938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0442303938

VL - 27

SP - 433

EP - 445

JO - International Interactions

JF - International Interactions

SN - 0305-0629

IS - 4

ER -