Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler

M. A. Sanderson, C. A. Rotz, S. W. Fultz, E. B. Rayburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate assessment of forage mass in pastures is key to budgeting forage in grazing systems. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of an electronic capacitance meter, a rising plate meter, and a pasture ruler in measuring forage mass and to determine the cost of measurement inaccuracy. Forage mass was estimated in grazed pastures on farms in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia in 1998 and 1999. Forage mass estimated by each method was compared with forage mass estimated by hand-clipped samples. None of these indirect methods were accurate or precise, and error levels ranged from 26 to 33% of the mean forage mass measured on the pastures. The computer model DAFOSYM (Dairy Forage System Model) was used to simulate farm performance and the resulting effects of inaccuracies in estimating forage mass on pasture. A representative grazing dairy farm was developed, and the costs and returns from low-input and conventional managements were calculated. Different scenarios were then simulated, including under- or overestimating forage yield on pastures by 10 or 20%. All scenarios simulated resulted in lower returns compared with the optimum farm, with decreases in net return ranging from $8 to $198 ha-1 yr-1. Underestimating forage mass resulted in less hay and silage being harvested, more pasture being consumed, and more forage purchased compared with the optimum scenario. The opposite occurred for overestimation of forage mass. Our results indicate that achieving greater accuracy (to within 10% of actual pasture yield) in estimating pasture yields will improve forage budgeting and increase net returns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1281-1286
Number of pages6
JournalAgronomy Journal
Volume93
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

Fingerprint

capacitance
meters (equipment)
pastures
forage
farms
grazing
forage yield
computer simulation
dairy farming
silage
electronics
hay
dairies
hands

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Sanderson, M. A., Rotz, C. A., Fultz, S. W., & Rayburn, E. B. (2001). Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler. Agronomy Journal, 93(6), 1281-1286.
Sanderson, M. A. ; Rotz, C. A. ; Fultz, S. W. ; Rayburn, E. B. / Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler. In: Agronomy Journal. 2001 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 1281-1286.
@article{ddb008de2bc24d7fab23763b82634344,
title = "Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler",
abstract = "Accurate assessment of forage mass in pastures is key to budgeting forage in grazing systems. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of an electronic capacitance meter, a rising plate meter, and a pasture ruler in measuring forage mass and to determine the cost of measurement inaccuracy. Forage mass was estimated in grazed pastures on farms in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia in 1998 and 1999. Forage mass estimated by each method was compared with forage mass estimated by hand-clipped samples. None of these indirect methods were accurate or precise, and error levels ranged from 26 to 33{\%} of the mean forage mass measured on the pastures. The computer model DAFOSYM (Dairy Forage System Model) was used to simulate farm performance and the resulting effects of inaccuracies in estimating forage mass on pasture. A representative grazing dairy farm was developed, and the costs and returns from low-input and conventional managements were calculated. Different scenarios were then simulated, including under- or overestimating forage yield on pastures by 10 or 20{\%}. All scenarios simulated resulted in lower returns compared with the optimum farm, with decreases in net return ranging from $8 to $198 ha-1 yr-1. Underestimating forage mass resulted in less hay and silage being harvested, more pasture being consumed, and more forage purchased compared with the optimum scenario. The opposite occurred for overestimation of forage mass. Our results indicate that achieving greater accuracy (to within 10{\%} of actual pasture yield) in estimating pasture yields will improve forage budgeting and increase net returns.",
author = "Sanderson, {M. A.} and Rotz, {C. A.} and Fultz, {S. W.} and Rayburn, {E. B.}",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "1281--1286",
journal = "Agronomy Journal",
issn = "0002-1962",
publisher = "American Society of Agronomy",
number = "6",

}

Sanderson, MA, Rotz, CA, Fultz, SW & Rayburn, EB 2001, 'Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler', Agronomy Journal, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1281-1286.

Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler. / Sanderson, M. A.; Rotz, C. A.; Fultz, S. W.; Rayburn, E. B.

In: Agronomy Journal, Vol. 93, No. 6, 01.12.2001, p. 1281-1286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler

AU - Sanderson, M. A.

AU - Rotz, C. A.

AU - Fultz, S. W.

AU - Rayburn, E. B.

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Accurate assessment of forage mass in pastures is key to budgeting forage in grazing systems. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of an electronic capacitance meter, a rising plate meter, and a pasture ruler in measuring forage mass and to determine the cost of measurement inaccuracy. Forage mass was estimated in grazed pastures on farms in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia in 1998 and 1999. Forage mass estimated by each method was compared with forage mass estimated by hand-clipped samples. None of these indirect methods were accurate or precise, and error levels ranged from 26 to 33% of the mean forage mass measured on the pastures. The computer model DAFOSYM (Dairy Forage System Model) was used to simulate farm performance and the resulting effects of inaccuracies in estimating forage mass on pasture. A representative grazing dairy farm was developed, and the costs and returns from low-input and conventional managements were calculated. Different scenarios were then simulated, including under- or overestimating forage yield on pastures by 10 or 20%. All scenarios simulated resulted in lower returns compared with the optimum farm, with decreases in net return ranging from $8 to $198 ha-1 yr-1. Underestimating forage mass resulted in less hay and silage being harvested, more pasture being consumed, and more forage purchased compared with the optimum scenario. The opposite occurred for overestimation of forage mass. Our results indicate that achieving greater accuracy (to within 10% of actual pasture yield) in estimating pasture yields will improve forage budgeting and increase net returns.

AB - Accurate assessment of forage mass in pastures is key to budgeting forage in grazing systems. Our objective was to determine the accuracy of an electronic capacitance meter, a rising plate meter, and a pasture ruler in measuring forage mass and to determine the cost of measurement inaccuracy. Forage mass was estimated in grazed pastures on farms in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia in 1998 and 1999. Forage mass estimated by each method was compared with forage mass estimated by hand-clipped samples. None of these indirect methods were accurate or precise, and error levels ranged from 26 to 33% of the mean forage mass measured on the pastures. The computer model DAFOSYM (Dairy Forage System Model) was used to simulate farm performance and the resulting effects of inaccuracies in estimating forage mass on pasture. A representative grazing dairy farm was developed, and the costs and returns from low-input and conventional managements were calculated. Different scenarios were then simulated, including under- or overestimating forage yield on pastures by 10 or 20%. All scenarios simulated resulted in lower returns compared with the optimum farm, with decreases in net return ranging from $8 to $198 ha-1 yr-1. Underestimating forage mass resulted in less hay and silage being harvested, more pasture being consumed, and more forage purchased compared with the optimum scenario. The opposite occurred for overestimation of forage mass. Our results indicate that achieving greater accuracy (to within 10% of actual pasture yield) in estimating pasture yields will improve forage budgeting and increase net returns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035659229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035659229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035659229

VL - 93

SP - 1281

EP - 1286

JO - Agronomy Journal

JF - Agronomy Journal

SN - 0002-1962

IS - 6

ER -

Sanderson MA, Rotz CA, Fultz SW, Rayburn EB. Estimating forage mass with a commercial capacitance meter, rising plate meter,and pasture ruler. Agronomy Journal. 2001 Dec 1;93(6):1281-1286.