Estimating longitudinal dispersion in rivers using Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers

Chaopeng Shen, Jie Niu, Eric J. Anderson, Mantha S. Phanikumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The longitudinal dispersion coefficient (D) is an important parameter needed to describe the transport of solutes in rivers and streams. The dispersion coefficient is generally estimated from tracer studies but the method can be expensive and time consuming, especially for large rivers. A number of empirical relations are available to estimate the dispersion coefficient; however, these relations are known to produce estimates within an order of magnitude of the tracer value. The focus of this paper is on using the shear-flow dispersion theory to directly estimate the dispersion coefficient from velocity measurements obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP). Using tracer and hydrodynamic data collected within the same river reaches, we examined conditions under which the ADCP and tracer methods produced similar results. Since dead zones / transient storage (TS) are known to influence the dispersion coefficient, we assessed the relative importance of dead zones in different stream reaches using two tracer-based approaches: (1) TS modeling which explicitly accounts for dead zones and (2) the advection-dispersion equation (ADE) which does not have separate terms for dead zones. Dispersion coefficients based on the ADE tend to be relatively high as they describe some of the effects of dead zones as well. Results based on the ADCP method were found to be in good agreement with the ADE estimates indicating that storage zones play an important role in the estimated dispersion coefficients, especially at high flows. For the river sites examined in this paper, the tracer estimates of dispersion were close to the median values of the ADCP estimates obtained from multiple datasets within a reach. The ADCP method appears to be an excellent alternative to the traditional tracer-based method if care is taken to avoid spurious data and multiple datasets are used to compute a distance-weighted average or other appropriate measure that represents reach-averaged conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-623
Number of pages9
JournalAdvances in Water Resources
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
river
tracer
advection
shear flow
solute
hydrodynamics
method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Shen, Chaopeng ; Niu, Jie ; Anderson, Eric J. ; Phanikumar, Mantha S. / Estimating longitudinal dispersion in rivers using Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers. In: Advances in Water Resources. 2010 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 615-623.
@article{1f68a4ea59e443b4b15de1df2c847b8b,
title = "Estimating longitudinal dispersion in rivers using Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers",
abstract = "The longitudinal dispersion coefficient (D) is an important parameter needed to describe the transport of solutes in rivers and streams. The dispersion coefficient is generally estimated from tracer studies but the method can be expensive and time consuming, especially for large rivers. A number of empirical relations are available to estimate the dispersion coefficient; however, these relations are known to produce estimates within an order of magnitude of the tracer value. The focus of this paper is on using the shear-flow dispersion theory to directly estimate the dispersion coefficient from velocity measurements obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP). Using tracer and hydrodynamic data collected within the same river reaches, we examined conditions under which the ADCP and tracer methods produced similar results. Since dead zones / transient storage (TS) are known to influence the dispersion coefficient, we assessed the relative importance of dead zones in different stream reaches using two tracer-based approaches: (1) TS modeling which explicitly accounts for dead zones and (2) the advection-dispersion equation (ADE) which does not have separate terms for dead zones. Dispersion coefficients based on the ADE tend to be relatively high as they describe some of the effects of dead zones as well. Results based on the ADCP method were found to be in good agreement with the ADE estimates indicating that storage zones play an important role in the estimated dispersion coefficients, especially at high flows. For the river sites examined in this paper, the tracer estimates of dispersion were close to the median values of the ADCP estimates obtained from multiple datasets within a reach. The ADCP method appears to be an excellent alternative to the traditional tracer-based method if care is taken to avoid spurious data and multiple datasets are used to compute a distance-weighted average or other appropriate measure that represents reach-averaged conditions.",
author = "Chaopeng Shen and Jie Niu and Anderson, {Eric J.} and Phanikumar, {Mantha S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "615--623",
journal = "Advances in Water Resources",
issn = "0309-1708",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

Estimating longitudinal dispersion in rivers using Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers. / Shen, Chaopeng; Niu, Jie; Anderson, Eric J.; Phanikumar, Mantha S.

In: Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.06.2010, p. 615-623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating longitudinal dispersion in rivers using Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers

AU - Shen, Chaopeng

AU - Niu, Jie

AU - Anderson, Eric J.

AU - Phanikumar, Mantha S.

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - The longitudinal dispersion coefficient (D) is an important parameter needed to describe the transport of solutes in rivers and streams. The dispersion coefficient is generally estimated from tracer studies but the method can be expensive and time consuming, especially for large rivers. A number of empirical relations are available to estimate the dispersion coefficient; however, these relations are known to produce estimates within an order of magnitude of the tracer value. The focus of this paper is on using the shear-flow dispersion theory to directly estimate the dispersion coefficient from velocity measurements obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP). Using tracer and hydrodynamic data collected within the same river reaches, we examined conditions under which the ADCP and tracer methods produced similar results. Since dead zones / transient storage (TS) are known to influence the dispersion coefficient, we assessed the relative importance of dead zones in different stream reaches using two tracer-based approaches: (1) TS modeling which explicitly accounts for dead zones and (2) the advection-dispersion equation (ADE) which does not have separate terms for dead zones. Dispersion coefficients based on the ADE tend to be relatively high as they describe some of the effects of dead zones as well. Results based on the ADCP method were found to be in good agreement with the ADE estimates indicating that storage zones play an important role in the estimated dispersion coefficients, especially at high flows. For the river sites examined in this paper, the tracer estimates of dispersion were close to the median values of the ADCP estimates obtained from multiple datasets within a reach. The ADCP method appears to be an excellent alternative to the traditional tracer-based method if care is taken to avoid spurious data and multiple datasets are used to compute a distance-weighted average or other appropriate measure that represents reach-averaged conditions.

AB - The longitudinal dispersion coefficient (D) is an important parameter needed to describe the transport of solutes in rivers and streams. The dispersion coefficient is generally estimated from tracer studies but the method can be expensive and time consuming, especially for large rivers. A number of empirical relations are available to estimate the dispersion coefficient; however, these relations are known to produce estimates within an order of magnitude of the tracer value. The focus of this paper is on using the shear-flow dispersion theory to directly estimate the dispersion coefficient from velocity measurements obtained using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP). Using tracer and hydrodynamic data collected within the same river reaches, we examined conditions under which the ADCP and tracer methods produced similar results. Since dead zones / transient storage (TS) are known to influence the dispersion coefficient, we assessed the relative importance of dead zones in different stream reaches using two tracer-based approaches: (1) TS modeling which explicitly accounts for dead zones and (2) the advection-dispersion equation (ADE) which does not have separate terms for dead zones. Dispersion coefficients based on the ADE tend to be relatively high as they describe some of the effects of dead zones as well. Results based on the ADCP method were found to be in good agreement with the ADE estimates indicating that storage zones play an important role in the estimated dispersion coefficients, especially at high flows. For the river sites examined in this paper, the tracer estimates of dispersion were close to the median values of the ADCP estimates obtained from multiple datasets within a reach. The ADCP method appears to be an excellent alternative to the traditional tracer-based method if care is taken to avoid spurious data and multiple datasets are used to compute a distance-weighted average or other appropriate measure that represents reach-averaged conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953128278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953128278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.02.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953128278

VL - 33

SP - 615

EP - 623

JO - Advances in Water Resources

JF - Advances in Water Resources

SN - 0309-1708

IS - 6

ER -