Estimating the effect of selected predictors on agricultural confined-space hazard perceptions of Utah farm owner/operators

Michael Pate, Xin Dai

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess how selected variables affect the confined- space hazard perceptions of farmers in Utah. A confined space was defined as "any space found in an agricultural workplace that was not designed or intended as a regular workstation, has limited or restricted means of entry or exit, and contains potential physical and toxic hazards to workers who intentionally or unintentionally enter the space" (proposed by NCERA-197, 18 May 2011, draft copy). A total of 303 out of 327 farm owner/operators provided complete surveys that were used in the analysis. The state of Utah was grouped into five regions in this study: central, east, northeast, northwest, and southwest. Grain and dairy production comprised 48.7% of the operations responding to the survey. The general linear modeling (GLM) procedure in SAS 9.3 was used to select the models on hazard perception scores for the five studied regions. Interested predictors included response type, production type, safety planning, and injury concerns. Animal production operations had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.7). Regionally, the northwest region had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.5). The variables contributing most to confined-space hazard perceptions were injury and death concerns while working alone in confined spaces. Three factors were generated using principle factor analysis (PFA) with orthogonal varimax rotation. Results suggested that factors affect hazard perceptions differently by region. We conclude that outreach and educational efforts to change safety behaviors regarding confined- space hazards should be strategically targeted for each region based on predicting factors. The result can assist agricultural safety and health professionals in targeting agricultural producers' social networks to address human factors such as worker attitudes and/or lack of skills or knowledge that effect hazard perceptions of confined spaces in agriculture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages109-125
Number of pages17
Volume20
No2
Specialist publicationJournal of Agricultural Safety and Health
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Space Perception
Confined Spaces
Farms
Hazards
agricultural health and safety
farms
outreach
social networks
working conditions
health care workers
animal production
milk production
planning
death
farmers
agriculture
Safety
Dairies
Factor analysis
Human engineering

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@misc{7993f66075ee4b8aacf22731f4afb35a,
title = "Estimating the effect of selected predictors on agricultural confined-space hazard perceptions of Utah farm owner/operators",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to assess how selected variables affect the confined- space hazard perceptions of farmers in Utah. A confined space was defined as {"}any space found in an agricultural workplace that was not designed or intended as a regular workstation, has limited or restricted means of entry or exit, and contains potential physical and toxic hazards to workers who intentionally or unintentionally enter the space{"} (proposed by NCERA-197, 18 May 2011, draft copy). A total of 303 out of 327 farm owner/operators provided complete surveys that were used in the analysis. The state of Utah was grouped into five regions in this study: central, east, northeast, northwest, and southwest. Grain and dairy production comprised 48.7{\%} of the operations responding to the survey. The general linear modeling (GLM) procedure in SAS 9.3 was used to select the models on hazard perception scores for the five studied regions. Interested predictors included response type, production type, safety planning, and injury concerns. Animal production operations had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.7). Regionally, the northwest region had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.5). The variables contributing most to confined-space hazard perceptions were injury and death concerns while working alone in confined spaces. Three factors were generated using principle factor analysis (PFA) with orthogonal varimax rotation. Results suggested that factors affect hazard perceptions differently by region. We conclude that outreach and educational efforts to change safety behaviors regarding confined- space hazards should be strategically targeted for each region based on predicting factors. The result can assist agricultural safety and health professionals in targeting agricultural producers' social networks to address human factors such as worker attitudes and/or lack of skills or knowledge that effect hazard perceptions of confined spaces in agriculture.",
author = "Michael Pate and Xin Dai",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13031/jash.20.10386",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "109--125",
journal = "Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health",
issn = "1074-7583",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",

}

Estimating the effect of selected predictors on agricultural confined-space hazard perceptions of Utah farm owner/operators. / Pate, Michael; Dai, Xin.

In: Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 109-125.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - Estimating the effect of selected predictors on agricultural confined-space hazard perceptions of Utah farm owner/operators

AU - Pate, Michael

AU - Dai, Xin

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to assess how selected variables affect the confined- space hazard perceptions of farmers in Utah. A confined space was defined as "any space found in an agricultural workplace that was not designed or intended as a regular workstation, has limited or restricted means of entry or exit, and contains potential physical and toxic hazards to workers who intentionally or unintentionally enter the space" (proposed by NCERA-197, 18 May 2011, draft copy). A total of 303 out of 327 farm owner/operators provided complete surveys that were used in the analysis. The state of Utah was grouped into five regions in this study: central, east, northeast, northwest, and southwest. Grain and dairy production comprised 48.7% of the operations responding to the survey. The general linear modeling (GLM) procedure in SAS 9.3 was used to select the models on hazard perception scores for the five studied regions. Interested predictors included response type, production type, safety planning, and injury concerns. Animal production operations had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.7). Regionally, the northwest region had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.5). The variables contributing most to confined-space hazard perceptions were injury and death concerns while working alone in confined spaces. Three factors were generated using principle factor analysis (PFA) with orthogonal varimax rotation. Results suggested that factors affect hazard perceptions differently by region. We conclude that outreach and educational efforts to change safety behaviors regarding confined- space hazards should be strategically targeted for each region based on predicting factors. The result can assist agricultural safety and health professionals in targeting agricultural producers' social networks to address human factors such as worker attitudes and/or lack of skills or knowledge that effect hazard perceptions of confined spaces in agriculture.

AB - The purpose of this study was to assess how selected variables affect the confined- space hazard perceptions of farmers in Utah. A confined space was defined as "any space found in an agricultural workplace that was not designed or intended as a regular workstation, has limited or restricted means of entry or exit, and contains potential physical and toxic hazards to workers who intentionally or unintentionally enter the space" (proposed by NCERA-197, 18 May 2011, draft copy). A total of 303 out of 327 farm owner/operators provided complete surveys that were used in the analysis. The state of Utah was grouped into five regions in this study: central, east, northeast, northwest, and southwest. Grain and dairy production comprised 48.7% of the operations responding to the survey. The general linear modeling (GLM) procedure in SAS 9.3 was used to select the models on hazard perception scores for the five studied regions. Interested predictors included response type, production type, safety planning, and injury concerns. Animal production operations had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.7). Regionally, the northwest region had the highest average number of confined spaces (μ = 4, SD = 2.5). The variables contributing most to confined-space hazard perceptions were injury and death concerns while working alone in confined spaces. Three factors were generated using principle factor analysis (PFA) with orthogonal varimax rotation. Results suggested that factors affect hazard perceptions differently by region. We conclude that outreach and educational efforts to change safety behaviors regarding confined- space hazards should be strategically targeted for each region based on predicting factors. The result can assist agricultural safety and health professionals in targeting agricultural producers' social networks to address human factors such as worker attitudes and/or lack of skills or knowledge that effect hazard perceptions of confined spaces in agriculture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899147772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899147772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13031/jash.20.10386

DO - 10.13031/jash.20.10386

M3 - Article

C2 - 24897918

AN - SCOPUS:84899147772

VL - 20

SP - 109

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health

JF - Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health

SN - 1074-7583

ER -