Estimation in supply chain inventory management

Jack C. Hayya, Jeon G. Kim, Stephen M. Disney, Terry P. Harrison, Dean Chatfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differences in estimation or forecasting procedures could produce dramatically different parameter estimates in supply chain inventory management. We show, for example, that determining when to introduce estimates of lead times in the calculation of the variance of demand during lead time can yield dramatically different safety stocks and order-up-to levels. Also, calculations of supply chain variance amplification using a firewalled, sequential chain execution differ markedly from an analysis that considers a k -echelon analysis as a whole, k ?<?2. There is also the issue of forecasting lumpy demand when negative orders are not allowed. Our research compares the results in the recent literature and shows how apparently equivalent estimation procedures concerning demand during lead time (for example, using separate historical lead time and demand rate data versus directly using historical data of demand during lead time) are not equivalent; also, that the conventional exponential smoothing forecasting may not be appropriate at the higher echelons of supply chains where lumpy demand frequently occurs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1313-1330
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Production Research
Volume44
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

Fingerprint

Supply chains
Amplification
Inventory management
Supply chain
Lead time
Lumpy demand

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Hayya, Jack C. ; Kim, Jeon G. ; Disney, Stephen M. ; Harrison, Terry P. ; Chatfield, Dean. / Estimation in supply chain inventory management. In: International Journal of Production Research. 2006 ; Vol. 44, No. 7. pp. 1313-1330.
@article{7c26ec593e2d4218a17c81c920a0ecf3,
title = "Estimation in supply chain inventory management",
abstract = "Differences in estimation or forecasting procedures could produce dramatically different parameter estimates in supply chain inventory management. We show, for example, that determining when to introduce estimates of lead times in the calculation of the variance of demand during lead time can yield dramatically different safety stocks and order-up-to levels. Also, calculations of supply chain variance amplification using a firewalled, sequential chain execution differ markedly from an analysis that considers a k -echelon analysis as a whole, k ?<?2. There is also the issue of forecasting lumpy demand when negative orders are not allowed. Our research compares the results in the recent literature and shows how apparently equivalent estimation procedures concerning demand during lead time (for example, using separate historical lead time and demand rate data versus directly using historical data of demand during lead time) are not equivalent; also, that the conventional exponential smoothing forecasting may not be appropriate at the higher echelons of supply chains where lumpy demand frequently occurs.",
author = "Hayya, {Jack C.} and Kim, {Jeon G.} and Disney, {Stephen M.} and Harrison, {Terry P.} and Dean Chatfield",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00207540500338039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1313--1330",
journal = "International Journal of Production Research",
issn = "0020-7543",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Estimation in supply chain inventory management. / Hayya, Jack C.; Kim, Jeon G.; Disney, Stephen M.; Harrison, Terry P.; Chatfield, Dean.

In: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44, No. 7, 01.04.2006, p. 1313-1330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation in supply chain inventory management

AU - Hayya, Jack C.

AU - Kim, Jeon G.

AU - Disney, Stephen M.

AU - Harrison, Terry P.

AU - Chatfield, Dean

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Differences in estimation or forecasting procedures could produce dramatically different parameter estimates in supply chain inventory management. We show, for example, that determining when to introduce estimates of lead times in the calculation of the variance of demand during lead time can yield dramatically different safety stocks and order-up-to levels. Also, calculations of supply chain variance amplification using a firewalled, sequential chain execution differ markedly from an analysis that considers a k -echelon analysis as a whole, k ?<?2. There is also the issue of forecasting lumpy demand when negative orders are not allowed. Our research compares the results in the recent literature and shows how apparently equivalent estimation procedures concerning demand during lead time (for example, using separate historical lead time and demand rate data versus directly using historical data of demand during lead time) are not equivalent; also, that the conventional exponential smoothing forecasting may not be appropriate at the higher echelons of supply chains where lumpy demand frequently occurs.

AB - Differences in estimation or forecasting procedures could produce dramatically different parameter estimates in supply chain inventory management. We show, for example, that determining when to introduce estimates of lead times in the calculation of the variance of demand during lead time can yield dramatically different safety stocks and order-up-to levels. Also, calculations of supply chain variance amplification using a firewalled, sequential chain execution differ markedly from an analysis that considers a k -echelon analysis as a whole, k ?<?2. There is also the issue of forecasting lumpy demand when negative orders are not allowed. Our research compares the results in the recent literature and shows how apparently equivalent estimation procedures concerning demand during lead time (for example, using separate historical lead time and demand rate data versus directly using historical data of demand during lead time) are not equivalent; also, that the conventional exponential smoothing forecasting may not be appropriate at the higher echelons of supply chains where lumpy demand frequently occurs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32644467966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32644467966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00207540500338039

DO - 10.1080/00207540500338039

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:32644467966

VL - 44

SP - 1313

EP - 1330

JO - International Journal of Production Research

JF - International Journal of Production Research

SN - 0020-7543

IS - 7

ER -