Estrogen-induced suppression of intake is not mediated by taste aversion in female rats

Loretta M. Flanagan-Cato, Patricia Sue Grigson, Jennifer L. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estrogen treatment can suppress the intake of a previously presented gustatory conditioned stimulus (CS). This finding has been interpreted as an estrogen-induced conditioned taste aversion. However, a distinction must be made between taste aversion and taste avoidance. In particular, tastes are only considered aversive if they elicit a stereotypic behavioral response, otherwise the reduction in intake is classified as an avoidance. Although aversive orofacial responses have been reported in male rats after taste - estrogen pairings, they have not been examined in ovariectomized female rats. The goal of the present investigation, then, was to use similar procedures to determine whether conditioned aversion also mediates the estrogen - induced reduction of intake in female rats. Animals were introduced to a novel 0.1% saccharin solution and immediately thereafter were given a subcutaneous injection of vehicle or estradiol benzoate (10 μg). Responses were assessed using a two-bottle preference test, a one-bottle acceptance test, and a taste reactivity (TR) test. The results confirmed previous reports of a reduced preference for saccharin after saccharin - estradiol pairing using the two-bottle test. The reduction in intake during the one-bottle test, however, was not accompanied by stereotypic aversive responses, such as gaping. Surprisingly, a similar reduction in intake also occurred when using a backward conditioning procedure in which estrogen was injected before, rather than after, CS access. Thus, the present results show that the suppressive effects of estrogen reflect an avoidance, rather than aversion and, moreover, that the reduced intake may be due to an unconditioned, rather than a conditioned, response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-558
Number of pages10
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume72
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Estrogens
Saccharin
Subcutaneous Injections
Estradiol

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Flanagan-Cato, Loretta M. ; Grigson, Patricia Sue ; King, Jennifer L. / Estrogen-induced suppression of intake is not mediated by taste aversion in female rats. In: Physiology and Behavior. 2001 ; Vol. 72, No. 4. pp. 549-558.
@article{cedf662408b4490cb7a8c3d182b0afde,
title = "Estrogen-induced suppression of intake is not mediated by taste aversion in female rats",
abstract = "Estrogen treatment can suppress the intake of a previously presented gustatory conditioned stimulus (CS). This finding has been interpreted as an estrogen-induced conditioned taste aversion. However, a distinction must be made between taste aversion and taste avoidance. In particular, tastes are only considered aversive if they elicit a stereotypic behavioral response, otherwise the reduction in intake is classified as an avoidance. Although aversive orofacial responses have been reported in male rats after taste - estrogen pairings, they have not been examined in ovariectomized female rats. The goal of the present investigation, then, was to use similar procedures to determine whether conditioned aversion also mediates the estrogen - induced reduction of intake in female rats. Animals were introduced to a novel 0.1{\%} saccharin solution and immediately thereafter were given a subcutaneous injection of vehicle or estradiol benzoate (10 μg). Responses were assessed using a two-bottle preference test, a one-bottle acceptance test, and a taste reactivity (TR) test. The results confirmed previous reports of a reduced preference for saccharin after saccharin - estradiol pairing using the two-bottle test. The reduction in intake during the one-bottle test, however, was not accompanied by stereotypic aversive responses, such as gaping. Surprisingly, a similar reduction in intake also occurred when using a backward conditioning procedure in which estrogen was injected before, rather than after, CS access. Thus, the present results show that the suppressive effects of estrogen reflect an avoidance, rather than aversion and, moreover, that the reduced intake may be due to an unconditioned, rather than a conditioned, response.",
author = "Flanagan-Cato, {Loretta M.} and Grigson, {Patricia Sue} and King, {Jennifer L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00411-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "549--558",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Estrogen-induced suppression of intake is not mediated by taste aversion in female rats. / Flanagan-Cato, Loretta M.; Grigson, Patricia Sue; King, Jennifer L.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 72, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 549-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estrogen-induced suppression of intake is not mediated by taste aversion in female rats

AU - Flanagan-Cato, Loretta M.

AU - Grigson, Patricia Sue

AU - King, Jennifer L.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Estrogen treatment can suppress the intake of a previously presented gustatory conditioned stimulus (CS). This finding has been interpreted as an estrogen-induced conditioned taste aversion. However, a distinction must be made between taste aversion and taste avoidance. In particular, tastes are only considered aversive if they elicit a stereotypic behavioral response, otherwise the reduction in intake is classified as an avoidance. Although aversive orofacial responses have been reported in male rats after taste - estrogen pairings, they have not been examined in ovariectomized female rats. The goal of the present investigation, then, was to use similar procedures to determine whether conditioned aversion also mediates the estrogen - induced reduction of intake in female rats. Animals were introduced to a novel 0.1% saccharin solution and immediately thereafter were given a subcutaneous injection of vehicle or estradiol benzoate (10 μg). Responses were assessed using a two-bottle preference test, a one-bottle acceptance test, and a taste reactivity (TR) test. The results confirmed previous reports of a reduced preference for saccharin after saccharin - estradiol pairing using the two-bottle test. The reduction in intake during the one-bottle test, however, was not accompanied by stereotypic aversive responses, such as gaping. Surprisingly, a similar reduction in intake also occurred when using a backward conditioning procedure in which estrogen was injected before, rather than after, CS access. Thus, the present results show that the suppressive effects of estrogen reflect an avoidance, rather than aversion and, moreover, that the reduced intake may be due to an unconditioned, rather than a conditioned, response.

AB - Estrogen treatment can suppress the intake of a previously presented gustatory conditioned stimulus (CS). This finding has been interpreted as an estrogen-induced conditioned taste aversion. However, a distinction must be made between taste aversion and taste avoidance. In particular, tastes are only considered aversive if they elicit a stereotypic behavioral response, otherwise the reduction in intake is classified as an avoidance. Although aversive orofacial responses have been reported in male rats after taste - estrogen pairings, they have not been examined in ovariectomized female rats. The goal of the present investigation, then, was to use similar procedures to determine whether conditioned aversion also mediates the estrogen - induced reduction of intake in female rats. Animals were introduced to a novel 0.1% saccharin solution and immediately thereafter were given a subcutaneous injection of vehicle or estradiol benzoate (10 μg). Responses were assessed using a two-bottle preference test, a one-bottle acceptance test, and a taste reactivity (TR) test. The results confirmed previous reports of a reduced preference for saccharin after saccharin - estradiol pairing using the two-bottle test. The reduction in intake during the one-bottle test, however, was not accompanied by stereotypic aversive responses, such as gaping. Surprisingly, a similar reduction in intake also occurred when using a backward conditioning procedure in which estrogen was injected before, rather than after, CS access. Thus, the present results show that the suppressive effects of estrogen reflect an avoidance, rather than aversion and, moreover, that the reduced intake may be due to an unconditioned, rather than a conditioned, response.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035088149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035088149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00411-5

DO - 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00411-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 11282139

AN - SCOPUS:0035088149

VL - 72

SP - 549

EP - 558

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

IS - 4

ER -