Ethics, the illegality of physician assisted suicide in the United States, and the role and ordeal of Dr. Jack Kevorkian before his death

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper tries to argue that physician-assisted suicide (PAS), which is opposed by the AMA and all US states except Oregon, is a moral and ethical dilemma that faces physicians, ethicists, legal experts, and others. To demonstrate this, the various dimensions of the debate are explored. This is accomplished by discussing the legal, ethical, medical and political ordeals of its most infamous practitioner, Dr. Jack Kevorkian of Michigan (1928-2011). As the paper argues, Dr. Kevorkian's belief in the practice of PAS led him to assist in the suicide of James Adkins in 1998. This began his legal problems, which lasted for about ten years (while continuing this practice, causing the state of Michigan to pass stricter laws against PAS). However, it was his more active administration of the suicide of Thomas York (who had Lou Gehrig's disease), and its demonstration on CBS' 60-Minutes program, that led to his most severe legal ordeal in 1998 that landed him a prison sentence of 10 to 25 years (of which he served 8). In the paper, various ethical, moral, and legal arguments, evoked by ethicists, philosophers and legal experts are presented. However, the paper begins with the ordeal of Dr. Kevorkian and the reaction to the 60-Minutes piece by the media, religious authors, and others are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-209
Number of pages7
JournalReview of European Studies
Volume4
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

illegality
assisted suicide
moral philosophy
physician
death
suicide
expert
imprisonment
Disease
Law
Physician-assisted Suicide
Ordeal

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • History

Cite this

@article{7b613866f5314e638cc2ed3c8f923bbb,
title = "Ethics, the illegality of physician assisted suicide in the United States, and the role and ordeal of Dr. Jack Kevorkian before his death",
abstract = "The paper tries to argue that physician-assisted suicide (PAS), which is opposed by the AMA and all US states except Oregon, is a moral and ethical dilemma that faces physicians, ethicists, legal experts, and others. To demonstrate this, the various dimensions of the debate are explored. This is accomplished by discussing the legal, ethical, medical and political ordeals of its most infamous practitioner, Dr. Jack Kevorkian of Michigan (1928-2011). As the paper argues, Dr. Kevorkian's belief in the practice of PAS led him to assist in the suicide of James Adkins in 1998. This began his legal problems, which lasted for about ten years (while continuing this practice, causing the state of Michigan to pass stricter laws against PAS). However, it was his more active administration of the suicide of Thomas York (who had Lou Gehrig's disease), and its demonstration on CBS' 60-Minutes program, that led to his most severe legal ordeal in 1998 that landed him a prison sentence of 10 to 25 years (of which he served 8). In the paper, various ethical, moral, and legal arguments, evoked by ethicists, philosophers and legal experts are presented. However, the paper begins with the ordeal of Dr. Kevorkian and the reaction to the 60-Minutes piece by the media, religious authors, and others are presented.",
author = "Hengameh Hosseini",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5539/res.v4n5p203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "203--209",
journal = "Review of European Studies",
issn = "1918-7173",
publisher = "Canadian Center of Science and Education",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics, the illegality of physician assisted suicide in the United States, and the role and ordeal of Dr. Jack Kevorkian before his death

AU - Hosseini, Hengameh

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - The paper tries to argue that physician-assisted suicide (PAS), which is opposed by the AMA and all US states except Oregon, is a moral and ethical dilemma that faces physicians, ethicists, legal experts, and others. To demonstrate this, the various dimensions of the debate are explored. This is accomplished by discussing the legal, ethical, medical and political ordeals of its most infamous practitioner, Dr. Jack Kevorkian of Michigan (1928-2011). As the paper argues, Dr. Kevorkian's belief in the practice of PAS led him to assist in the suicide of James Adkins in 1998. This began his legal problems, which lasted for about ten years (while continuing this practice, causing the state of Michigan to pass stricter laws against PAS). However, it was his more active administration of the suicide of Thomas York (who had Lou Gehrig's disease), and its demonstration on CBS' 60-Minutes program, that led to his most severe legal ordeal in 1998 that landed him a prison sentence of 10 to 25 years (of which he served 8). In the paper, various ethical, moral, and legal arguments, evoked by ethicists, philosophers and legal experts are presented. However, the paper begins with the ordeal of Dr. Kevorkian and the reaction to the 60-Minutes piece by the media, religious authors, and others are presented.

AB - The paper tries to argue that physician-assisted suicide (PAS), which is opposed by the AMA and all US states except Oregon, is a moral and ethical dilemma that faces physicians, ethicists, legal experts, and others. To demonstrate this, the various dimensions of the debate are explored. This is accomplished by discussing the legal, ethical, medical and political ordeals of its most infamous practitioner, Dr. Jack Kevorkian of Michigan (1928-2011). As the paper argues, Dr. Kevorkian's belief in the practice of PAS led him to assist in the suicide of James Adkins in 1998. This began his legal problems, which lasted for about ten years (while continuing this practice, causing the state of Michigan to pass stricter laws against PAS). However, it was his more active administration of the suicide of Thomas York (who had Lou Gehrig's disease), and its demonstration on CBS' 60-Minutes program, that led to his most severe legal ordeal in 1998 that landed him a prison sentence of 10 to 25 years (of which he served 8). In the paper, various ethical, moral, and legal arguments, evoked by ethicists, philosophers and legal experts are presented. However, the paper begins with the ordeal of Dr. Kevorkian and the reaction to the 60-Minutes piece by the media, religious authors, and others are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873928437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873928437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5539/res.v4n5p203

DO - 10.5539/res.v4n5p203

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84873928437

VL - 4

SP - 203

EP - 209

JO - Review of European Studies

JF - Review of European Studies

SN - 1918-7173

IS - 5

ER -