Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons

Darrell Steffensmeier, Stephen Demuth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

221 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study uses data on Pennsylvania sentencing practices to compare the sentence outcomes of white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Besides the overall more lenient treatment of white defendants, our main finding is that Hispanic defendants are the defendant subgroup most at risk to receive the harshest penalty. This pattern is held across all comparisons - i.e., for both the in/out and term-length decisions and for both drug and nondrug cases. These findings are consistent with the "focal concerns" framework on sentencing and with hypotheses drawn from the writings on prejudice and intergroup hostility suggesting that the specific social and historical context facing Hispanic Americans will exacerbate perceptions of their cultural dissimilarity and the "threat" they pose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-176
Number of pages32
JournalCriminology
Volume39
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2001

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
prejudice
penalty
ethnicity
threat
drug
Hostility
Pharmaceutical Preparations
hydroquinone
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

@article{7ab4ed62f38546c3b5de4a733c046ae3,
title = "Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons",
abstract = "This study uses data on Pennsylvania sentencing practices to compare the sentence outcomes of white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Besides the overall more lenient treatment of white defendants, our main finding is that Hispanic defendants are the defendant subgroup most at risk to receive the harshest penalty. This pattern is held across all comparisons - i.e., for both the in/out and term-length decisions and for both drug and nondrug cases. These findings are consistent with the {"}focal concerns{"} framework on sentencing and with hypotheses drawn from the writings on prejudice and intergroup hostility suggesting that the specific social and historical context facing Hispanic Americans will exacerbate perceptions of their cultural dissimilarity and the {"}threat{"} they pose.",
author = "Darrell Steffensmeier and Stephen Demuth",
year = "2001",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "145--176",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions : Hispanic-black-white comparisons. / Steffensmeier, Darrell; Demuth, Stephen.

In: Criminology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.02.2001, p. 145-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions

T2 - Hispanic-black-white comparisons

AU - Steffensmeier, Darrell

AU - Demuth, Stephen

PY - 2001/2/1

Y1 - 2001/2/1

N2 - This study uses data on Pennsylvania sentencing practices to compare the sentence outcomes of white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Besides the overall more lenient treatment of white defendants, our main finding is that Hispanic defendants are the defendant subgroup most at risk to receive the harshest penalty. This pattern is held across all comparisons - i.e., for both the in/out and term-length decisions and for both drug and nondrug cases. These findings are consistent with the "focal concerns" framework on sentencing and with hypotheses drawn from the writings on prejudice and intergroup hostility suggesting that the specific social and historical context facing Hispanic Americans will exacerbate perceptions of their cultural dissimilarity and the "threat" they pose.

AB - This study uses data on Pennsylvania sentencing practices to compare the sentence outcomes of white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Besides the overall more lenient treatment of white defendants, our main finding is that Hispanic defendants are the defendant subgroup most at risk to receive the harshest penalty. This pattern is held across all comparisons - i.e., for both the in/out and term-length decisions and for both drug and nondrug cases. These findings are consistent with the "focal concerns" framework on sentencing and with hypotheses drawn from the writings on prejudice and intergroup hostility suggesting that the specific social and historical context facing Hispanic Americans will exacerbate perceptions of their cultural dissimilarity and the "threat" they pose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041075817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041075817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041075817

VL - 39

SP - 145

EP - 176

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 1

ER -