Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is punished more harshly?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

373 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using federal court data collected by the U.S. Sentencing Commission for the years 1993-1996, this study examines racial/ethnic differences-white versus black versus white-Hispanic versus black-Hispanic-in sentencing outcomes and criteria under the federal sentencing guidelines. Regression analyses of incarceration and term-length decisions reveal considerable judicial consistency in the use of sentencing criteria for all defendants; however, important racial/ethnic disparities in sentencing emerge. Consistent with theoretical hypotheses, the authors find that ethnicity has a small to moderate effect on sentencing outcomes that favors white defendants and penalizes Hispanic defendants; black defendants are in an intermediate position. Hispanic drug offenders are most at risk of receiving the harshest penalties, and their harsher treatment is most pronounced in prosecutor-controlled guidelines departure cases. These findings highlight both a classic organizational tension noted by Weber and a fundamental dilemma in policy efforts to structure sentencing processes (formal rationality) while allowing for judicial and prosecutorial discretion (substantive rationality). The findings also broaden our view of the continuing significance of race in American society-as a matter confronting not only blacks but also Hispanics and perhaps other ethnic groups as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-729
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican sociological review
Volume65
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

rationality
ethnicity
offender
penalty
ethnic group
drug
regression
Society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{1d2af0226db441cf9657c4784b1b1a59,
title = "Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is punished more harshly?",
abstract = "Using federal court data collected by the U.S. Sentencing Commission for the years 1993-1996, this study examines racial/ethnic differences-white versus black versus white-Hispanic versus black-Hispanic-in sentencing outcomes and criteria under the federal sentencing guidelines. Regression analyses of incarceration and term-length decisions reveal considerable judicial consistency in the use of sentencing criteria for all defendants; however, important racial/ethnic disparities in sentencing emerge. Consistent with theoretical hypotheses, the authors find that ethnicity has a small to moderate effect on sentencing outcomes that favors white defendants and penalizes Hispanic defendants; black defendants are in an intermediate position. Hispanic drug offenders are most at risk of receiving the harshest penalties, and their harsher treatment is most pronounced in prosecutor-controlled guidelines departure cases. These findings highlight both a classic organizational tension noted by Weber and a fundamental dilemma in policy efforts to structure sentencing processes (formal rationality) while allowing for judicial and prosecutorial discretion (substantive rationality). The findings also broaden our view of the continuing significance of race in American society-as a matter confronting not only blacks but also Hispanics and perhaps other ethnic groups as well.",
author = "Steffensmeier, {Darrell J.} and S. Demuth",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/2657543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "705--729",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "5",

}

Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts : Who is punished more harshly? / Steffensmeier, Darrell J.; Demuth, S.

In: American sociological review, Vol. 65, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 705-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts

T2 - Who is punished more harshly?

AU - Steffensmeier, Darrell J.

AU - Demuth, S.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Using federal court data collected by the U.S. Sentencing Commission for the years 1993-1996, this study examines racial/ethnic differences-white versus black versus white-Hispanic versus black-Hispanic-in sentencing outcomes and criteria under the federal sentencing guidelines. Regression analyses of incarceration and term-length decisions reveal considerable judicial consistency in the use of sentencing criteria for all defendants; however, important racial/ethnic disparities in sentencing emerge. Consistent with theoretical hypotheses, the authors find that ethnicity has a small to moderate effect on sentencing outcomes that favors white defendants and penalizes Hispanic defendants; black defendants are in an intermediate position. Hispanic drug offenders are most at risk of receiving the harshest penalties, and their harsher treatment is most pronounced in prosecutor-controlled guidelines departure cases. These findings highlight both a classic organizational tension noted by Weber and a fundamental dilemma in policy efforts to structure sentencing processes (formal rationality) while allowing for judicial and prosecutorial discretion (substantive rationality). The findings also broaden our view of the continuing significance of race in American society-as a matter confronting not only blacks but also Hispanics and perhaps other ethnic groups as well.

AB - Using federal court data collected by the U.S. Sentencing Commission for the years 1993-1996, this study examines racial/ethnic differences-white versus black versus white-Hispanic versus black-Hispanic-in sentencing outcomes and criteria under the federal sentencing guidelines. Regression analyses of incarceration and term-length decisions reveal considerable judicial consistency in the use of sentencing criteria for all defendants; however, important racial/ethnic disparities in sentencing emerge. Consistent with theoretical hypotheses, the authors find that ethnicity has a small to moderate effect on sentencing outcomes that favors white defendants and penalizes Hispanic defendants; black defendants are in an intermediate position. Hispanic drug offenders are most at risk of receiving the harshest penalties, and their harsher treatment is most pronounced in prosecutor-controlled guidelines departure cases. These findings highlight both a classic organizational tension noted by Weber and a fundamental dilemma in policy efforts to structure sentencing processes (formal rationality) while allowing for judicial and prosecutorial discretion (substantive rationality). The findings also broaden our view of the continuing significance of race in American society-as a matter confronting not only blacks but also Hispanics and perhaps other ethnic groups as well.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033713962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033713962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2657543

DO - 10.2307/2657543

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033713962

VL - 65

SP - 705

EP - 729

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 5

ER -