TY - JOUR
T1 - Europe 2020 and the European Research Area
T2 - the response by three small European countries
AU - McMillan, G. Steven
AU - St-Louislalonde, Bastien
AU - Bezzina, Frank
AU - Casey, Debra L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The European Association for the Advancement of the Social Sciences.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Both Europe 2020 and the European Research Area initiatives seek to better prepare the European Union (EU) to compete in the future. Towards this end, both programs encourage more scientific publications and international collaboration by the European member-states. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the smallest EU member-states and their respective universities (Cyprus, Luxembourg, and Malta), and how they have responded to these efforts. Our observation periods are divided between 2005–2010 and 2011–2016 with the latter being after the announcement of Europe 2020 in 2010. Our findings are that all three universities published many more articles in the second period. In addition, two of the universities had higher collaboration scores. However, while more international collaboration is usually associated with a higher impact of articles, our results are somewhat mixed. It seems that smaller countries benefit from international collaboration, but they must not move too far away from any distinctive scientific competences they have already developed. We also provide detailed mapping of the countries with whom the universities collaborated.
AB - Both Europe 2020 and the European Research Area initiatives seek to better prepare the European Union (EU) to compete in the future. Towards this end, both programs encourage more scientific publications and international collaboration by the European member-states. The purpose of this research paper is to analyze the smallest EU member-states and their respective universities (Cyprus, Luxembourg, and Malta), and how they have responded to these efforts. Our observation periods are divided between 2005–2010 and 2011–2016 with the latter being after the announcement of Europe 2020 in 2010. Our findings are that all three universities published many more articles in the second period. In addition, two of the universities had higher collaboration scores. However, while more international collaboration is usually associated with a higher impact of articles, our results are somewhat mixed. It seems that smaller countries benefit from international collaboration, but they must not move too far away from any distinctive scientific competences they have already developed. We also provide detailed mapping of the countries with whom the universities collaborated.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055025265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055025265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13511610.2018.1533809
DO - 10.1080/13511610.2018.1533809
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85055025265
VL - 34
SP - 495
EP - 510
JO - Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
JF - Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research
SN - 1351-1610
IS - 4
ER -