EVA, refined EVA, MVA, or traditional performance measures for the hospitality industry?

Seoki Lee, Woo Gon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stewart (1991) proposed economic value added (EVA) as a true measurement of a firm's performance and an executive's evaluation tool because EVA reflects only incremental values added to a firm after considering cost of capital. Kim [Kim, W.G., 2006. EVA and traditional accounting measures: which metric is a better predictor of market value of hospitality companies? Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 30(1), 34-39] examined EVA in the hospitality setting and concluded that EVA is not superior to other available measurements for accounting. However, this study contributes several improvements to Kim's (2006) study and compares the incremental explanatory power of six firm performance measures including EVA, refined EVA (REVA), market value added (MVA), and three traditional accounting performance measures for market adjusted returns. According to the findings, REVA and MVA are, apparently, valuable performance measures for evaluating hospitality firms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-445
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Hospitality Management
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'EVA, refined EVA, MVA, or traditional performance measures for the hospitality industry?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this