Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality

research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.

Dennis Patrick Scanlon, Jeffrey A. Alexander, Jeff Beich, Jon B. Christianson, Romana Hasnain-Wynia, Megan C. McHugh, Jessica N. Mittler, Yunfeng Shi, Laura J. Bodenschatz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative is the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF's) signature effort to increase the overall quality of healthcare in targeted communities throughout the country. In addition to sponsoring this 16-site, complex program, the RWJF funds an independent scientific evaluation to support objective research on the initiative's effectiveness and contributions to basic knowledge in 5 core programmatic areas. The research design, data, and challenges faced in the evaluation of this 10-year initiative are discussed. A descriptive overview of the evaluation research design for a multi-site, community based, healthcare quality improvement initiative is provided. The multiphase research design employed by the evaluation team is discussed. Evaluation provides formative feedback to the RWJF, participants, and other interested audiences in real time; develops approaches to assess innovative and under-studied interventions; furthers the analysis and understanding of effective community-based collaborative work in healthcare; and helps to differentiate the various facilitators, barriers, and contextual dimensions that affect the implementation and outcomes of community-based health interventions. The AF4Q initiative is arguably the largest community-level healthcare improvement demonstration in the United States to date; it is being implemented at a time of rapid change in national healthcare policy. The implementation of large-scale, multi-site initiatives is becoming an increasingly common approach for addressing problems in healthcare. The evaluation research design for the AF4Q initiative, and the lessons learned from its approach, may be valuable to others tasked with evaluating similar community-based initiatives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalThe American journal of managed care
Volume18
Issue number6 Suppl
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
Research Design
Community Health Services
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Financial Management
Quality Improvement
Health
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Scanlon, D. P., Alexander, J. A., Beich, J., Christianson, J. B., Hasnain-Wynia, R., McHugh, M. C., ... Bodenschatz, L. J. (2012). Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality: research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative. The American journal of managed care, 18(6 Suppl).
Scanlon, Dennis Patrick ; Alexander, Jeffrey A. ; Beich, Jeff ; Christianson, Jon B. ; Hasnain-Wynia, Romana ; McHugh, Megan C. ; Mittler, Jessica N. ; Shi, Yunfeng ; Bodenschatz, Laura J. / Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality : research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative. In: The American journal of managed care. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 6 Suppl.
@article{8f11c5f7eecc41619151ad1d3a823dcc,
title = "Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality: research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.",
abstract = "The Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative is the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF's) signature effort to increase the overall quality of healthcare in targeted communities throughout the country. In addition to sponsoring this 16-site, complex program, the RWJF funds an independent scientific evaluation to support objective research on the initiative's effectiveness and contributions to basic knowledge in 5 core programmatic areas. The research design, data, and challenges faced in the evaluation of this 10-year initiative are discussed. A descriptive overview of the evaluation research design for a multi-site, community based, healthcare quality improvement initiative is provided. The multiphase research design employed by the evaluation team is discussed. Evaluation provides formative feedback to the RWJF, participants, and other interested audiences in real time; develops approaches to assess innovative and under-studied interventions; furthers the analysis and understanding of effective community-based collaborative work in healthcare; and helps to differentiate the various facilitators, barriers, and contextual dimensions that affect the implementation and outcomes of community-based health interventions. The AF4Q initiative is arguably the largest community-level healthcare improvement demonstration in the United States to date; it is being implemented at a time of rapid change in national healthcare policy. The implementation of large-scale, multi-site initiatives is becoming an increasingly common approach for addressing problems in healthcare. The evaluation research design for the AF4Q initiative, and the lessons learned from its approach, may be valuable to others tasked with evaluating similar community-based initiatives.",
author = "Scanlon, {Dennis Patrick} and Alexander, {Jeffrey A.} and Jeff Beich and Christianson, {Jon B.} and Romana Hasnain-Wynia and McHugh, {Megan C.} and Mittler, {Jessica N.} and Yunfeng Shi and Bodenschatz, {Laura J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "6 Suppl",

}

Scanlon, DP, Alexander, JA, Beich, J, Christianson, JB, Hasnain-Wynia, R, McHugh, MC, Mittler, JN, Shi, Y & Bodenschatz, LJ 2012, 'Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality: research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.', The American journal of managed care, vol. 18, no. 6 Suppl.

Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality : research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative. / Scanlon, Dennis Patrick; Alexander, Jeffrey A.; Beich, Jeff; Christianson, Jon B.; Hasnain-Wynia, Romana; McHugh, Megan C.; Mittler, Jessica N.; Shi, Yunfeng; Bodenschatz, Laura J.

In: The American journal of managed care, Vol. 18, No. 6 Suppl, 01.09.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating a community-based program to improve healthcare quality

T2 - research design for the Aligning Forces for Quality initiative.

AU - Scanlon, Dennis Patrick

AU - Alexander, Jeffrey A.

AU - Beich, Jeff

AU - Christianson, Jon B.

AU - Hasnain-Wynia, Romana

AU - McHugh, Megan C.

AU - Mittler, Jessica N.

AU - Shi, Yunfeng

AU - Bodenschatz, Laura J.

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - The Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative is the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF's) signature effort to increase the overall quality of healthcare in targeted communities throughout the country. In addition to sponsoring this 16-site, complex program, the RWJF funds an independent scientific evaluation to support objective research on the initiative's effectiveness and contributions to basic knowledge in 5 core programmatic areas. The research design, data, and challenges faced in the evaluation of this 10-year initiative are discussed. A descriptive overview of the evaluation research design for a multi-site, community based, healthcare quality improvement initiative is provided. The multiphase research design employed by the evaluation team is discussed. Evaluation provides formative feedback to the RWJF, participants, and other interested audiences in real time; develops approaches to assess innovative and under-studied interventions; furthers the analysis and understanding of effective community-based collaborative work in healthcare; and helps to differentiate the various facilitators, barriers, and contextual dimensions that affect the implementation and outcomes of community-based health interventions. The AF4Q initiative is arguably the largest community-level healthcare improvement demonstration in the United States to date; it is being implemented at a time of rapid change in national healthcare policy. The implementation of large-scale, multi-site initiatives is becoming an increasingly common approach for addressing problems in healthcare. The evaluation research design for the AF4Q initiative, and the lessons learned from its approach, may be valuable to others tasked with evaluating similar community-based initiatives.

AB - The Aligning Forces for Quality (AF4Q) initiative is the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's (RWJF's) signature effort to increase the overall quality of healthcare in targeted communities throughout the country. In addition to sponsoring this 16-site, complex program, the RWJF funds an independent scientific evaluation to support objective research on the initiative's effectiveness and contributions to basic knowledge in 5 core programmatic areas. The research design, data, and challenges faced in the evaluation of this 10-year initiative are discussed. A descriptive overview of the evaluation research design for a multi-site, community based, healthcare quality improvement initiative is provided. The multiphase research design employed by the evaluation team is discussed. Evaluation provides formative feedback to the RWJF, participants, and other interested audiences in real time; develops approaches to assess innovative and under-studied interventions; furthers the analysis and understanding of effective community-based collaborative work in healthcare; and helps to differentiate the various facilitators, barriers, and contextual dimensions that affect the implementation and outcomes of community-based health interventions. The AF4Q initiative is arguably the largest community-level healthcare improvement demonstration in the United States to date; it is being implemented at a time of rapid change in national healthcare policy. The implementation of large-scale, multi-site initiatives is becoming an increasingly common approach for addressing problems in healthcare. The evaluation research design for the AF4Q initiative, and the lessons learned from its approach, may be valuable to others tasked with evaluating similar community-based initiatives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875185910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875185910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 6 Suppl

ER -