Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests

Ruggero Rossi, David Jones, Jaewook Myung, Emily Zikmund, Wulin Yang, Yolanda Alvarez Gallego, Deepak Pant, Patrick J. Evans, Martin A. Page, Donald M. Cropek, Bruce E. Logan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To scale up microbial fuel cells (MFCs), larger cathodes need to be developed that can use air directly, rather than dissolved oxygen, and have good electrochemical performance. A new type of cathode design was examined here that uses a “window-pane” approach with fifteen smaller cathodes welded to a single conductive metal sheet to maintain good electrical conductivity across the cathode with an increase in total area. Abiotic electrochemical tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the cathode size (exposed areas of 7 cm2, 33 cm2, and 6200 cm2) on performance for all cathodes having the same active catalyst material. Increasing the size of the exposed area of the electrodes to the electrolyte from 7 cm2 to 33 cm2 (a single cathode panel) decreased the cathode potential by 5%, and a further increase in size to 6200 cm2 using the multi-panel cathode reduced the electrode potential by 55% (at 0.6 A m−2), in a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS). In 85 L MFC tests with the largest cathode using wastewater as a fuel, the maximum power density based on polarization data was 0.083 ± 0.006 W m−2 using 22 brush anodes to fully cover the cathode, and 0.061 ± 0.003 W m−2 with 8 brush anodes (40% of cathode projected area) compared to 0.304 ± 0.009 W m−2 obtained in the 28 mL MFC. Recovering power from large MFCs will therefore be challenging, but several approaches identified in this study can be pursued to maintain performance when increasing the size of the electrodes.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages51-59
Number of pages9
JournalWater Research
Volume148
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

fuel cell
Cathodes
electrode
air
Air
Microbial fuel cells
electrolyte
electrical conductivity
dissolved oxygen
polarization
catalyst
phosphate
Brushes
wastewater
Electrodes
test
metal
Anodes
Dissolved oxygen
Sheet metal

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

Rossi, Ruggero ; Jones, David ; Myung, Jaewook ; Zikmund, Emily ; Yang, Wulin ; Gallego, Yolanda Alvarez ; Pant, Deepak ; Evans, Patrick J. ; Page, Martin A. ; Cropek, Donald M. ; Logan, Bruce E. / Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests. In: Water Research. 2019 ; Vol. 148. pp. 51-59.
@article{14f8a796d9d94834a7d0d39ed9768da1,
title = "Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests",
abstract = "To scale up microbial fuel cells (MFCs), larger cathodes need to be developed that can use air directly, rather than dissolved oxygen, and have good electrochemical performance. A new type of cathode design was examined here that uses a “window-pane” approach with fifteen smaller cathodes welded to a single conductive metal sheet to maintain good electrical conductivity across the cathode with an increase in total area. Abiotic electrochemical tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the cathode size (exposed areas of 7 cm2, 33 cm2, and 6200 cm2) on performance for all cathodes having the same active catalyst material. Increasing the size of the exposed area of the electrodes to the electrolyte from 7 cm2 to 33 cm2 (a single cathode panel) decreased the cathode potential by 5{\%}, and a further increase in size to 6200 cm2 using the multi-panel cathode reduced the electrode potential by 55{\%} (at 0.6 A m−2), in a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS). In 85 L MFC tests with the largest cathode using wastewater as a fuel, the maximum power density based on polarization data was 0.083 ± 0.006 W m−2 using 22 brush anodes to fully cover the cathode, and 0.061 ± 0.003 W m−2 with 8 brush anodes (40{\%} of cathode projected area) compared to 0.304 ± 0.009 W m−2 obtained in the 28 mL MFC. Recovering power from large MFCs will therefore be challenging, but several approaches identified in this study can be pursued to maintain performance when increasing the size of the electrodes.",
author = "Ruggero Rossi and David Jones and Jaewook Myung and Emily Zikmund and Wulin Yang and Gallego, {Yolanda Alvarez} and Deepak Pant and Evans, {Patrick J.} and Page, {Martin A.} and Cropek, {Donald M.} and Logan, {Bruce E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "51--59",
journal = "Water Research",
issn = "0043-1354",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Rossi, R, Jones, D, Myung, J, Zikmund, E, Yang, W, Gallego, YA, Pant, D, Evans, PJ, Page, MA, Cropek, DM & Logan, BE 2019, 'Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests' Water Research, vol. 148, pp. 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.022

Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests. / Rossi, Ruggero; Jones, David; Myung, Jaewook; Zikmund, Emily; Yang, Wulin; Gallego, Yolanda Alvarez; Pant, Deepak; Evans, Patrick J.; Page, Martin A.; Cropek, Donald M.; Logan, Bruce E.

In: Water Research, Vol. 148, 01.01.2019, p. 51-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests

AU - Rossi, Ruggero

AU - Jones, David

AU - Myung, Jaewook

AU - Zikmund, Emily

AU - Yang, Wulin

AU - Gallego, Yolanda Alvarez

AU - Pant, Deepak

AU - Evans, Patrick J.

AU - Page, Martin A.

AU - Cropek, Donald M.

AU - Logan, Bruce E.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - To scale up microbial fuel cells (MFCs), larger cathodes need to be developed that can use air directly, rather than dissolved oxygen, and have good electrochemical performance. A new type of cathode design was examined here that uses a “window-pane” approach with fifteen smaller cathodes welded to a single conductive metal sheet to maintain good electrical conductivity across the cathode with an increase in total area. Abiotic electrochemical tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the cathode size (exposed areas of 7 cm2, 33 cm2, and 6200 cm2) on performance for all cathodes having the same active catalyst material. Increasing the size of the exposed area of the electrodes to the electrolyte from 7 cm2 to 33 cm2 (a single cathode panel) decreased the cathode potential by 5%, and a further increase in size to 6200 cm2 using the multi-panel cathode reduced the electrode potential by 55% (at 0.6 A m−2), in a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS). In 85 L MFC tests with the largest cathode using wastewater as a fuel, the maximum power density based on polarization data was 0.083 ± 0.006 W m−2 using 22 brush anodes to fully cover the cathode, and 0.061 ± 0.003 W m−2 with 8 brush anodes (40% of cathode projected area) compared to 0.304 ± 0.009 W m−2 obtained in the 28 mL MFC. Recovering power from large MFCs will therefore be challenging, but several approaches identified in this study can be pursued to maintain performance when increasing the size of the electrodes.

AB - To scale up microbial fuel cells (MFCs), larger cathodes need to be developed that can use air directly, rather than dissolved oxygen, and have good electrochemical performance. A new type of cathode design was examined here that uses a “window-pane” approach with fifteen smaller cathodes welded to a single conductive metal sheet to maintain good electrical conductivity across the cathode with an increase in total area. Abiotic electrochemical tests were conducted to evaluate the impact of the cathode size (exposed areas of 7 cm2, 33 cm2, and 6200 cm2) on performance for all cathodes having the same active catalyst material. Increasing the size of the exposed area of the electrodes to the electrolyte from 7 cm2 to 33 cm2 (a single cathode panel) decreased the cathode potential by 5%, and a further increase in size to 6200 cm2 using the multi-panel cathode reduced the electrode potential by 55% (at 0.6 A m−2), in a 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (PBS). In 85 L MFC tests with the largest cathode using wastewater as a fuel, the maximum power density based on polarization data was 0.083 ± 0.006 W m−2 using 22 brush anodes to fully cover the cathode, and 0.061 ± 0.003 W m−2 with 8 brush anodes (40% of cathode projected area) compared to 0.304 ± 0.009 W m−2 obtained in the 28 mL MFC. Recovering power from large MFCs will therefore be challenging, but several approaches identified in this study can be pursued to maintain performance when increasing the size of the electrodes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055026857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055026857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.022

DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.022

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 51

EP - 59

JO - Water Research

T2 - Water Research

JF - Water Research

SN - 0043-1354

ER -

Rossi R, Jones D, Myung J, Zikmund E, Yang W, Gallego YA et al. Evaluating a multi-panel air cathode through electrochemical and biotic tests. Water Research. 2019 Jan 1;148:51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.022