Evaluating Deliberative Public Events and Projects

John Gastil, Katie Knobloch, Meghan Kelly

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Drawing on theoretical and empirical research on deliberation, this chapter seeks to answer the following question: What research designs and evaluation methods are used to assess the processes and outcomes of deliberative projects and programs? With a wide diversity of agencies and organizations deploying different approaches and institutional designs to deliberative civic engagement, it has become more important than ever to take seriously the evaluation of these processes. At present, however, there exist no systematic comparisons of alternative deliberative methods. This chapter aims to facilitate such comparisons through three main sections: (1) a review of the purposes and pitfalls of evaluation, (2) a description and operationalization of three general evaluation criteria based on past theory, research, and practice, and (3) a discussion of suggested measurement approaches for each criterion that can be combined to produce robust evaluations with either small or large research budgets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDemocracy in Motion
Subtitle of host publicationEvaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199980147
ISBN (Print)9780199899265
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Deliberative Public Events and Projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gastil, J., Knobloch, K., & Kelly, M. (2013). Evaluating Deliberative Public Events and Projects. In Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899265.003.0010