Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis

Chieh Chen Bowen, Janet K. Swim, Rick R. Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

124 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined gender bias on job performance in work settings where confounding variables (e.g., organizational level, experience, education) were cautiously taken into consideration to ensure fair comparisons. Although previous meta-analyses examined gender biases on evaluations, findings in tightly controlled laboratory environments may differ from those in highly complicated field studies. We found little evidence of overall gender bias in performance appraisals in noncontbunded field studies. However, there were significant pro-male biases when only men served as raters. Measure-specific gender stereotypicality, instead of general stereotypicality about the job, produced gender bias in performance appraisal. Masculine measures produced pro-male bias, and feminine measures produced pro-female bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2194-2215
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume30
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2000

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this