Die Evaluation von Politikmaßnahmen zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums zur Entwicklung von Sozial- und Humankapit

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluating RD Policies for Social and Human Capital Development

Jim Kinsella, Stephan J. Goetz, Mark D. Partridge, Steven C. Deller, David Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the EU, building social capital and developing human capital are increasingly seen as key to development in rural areas. Social capital is fundamentally about human interrelationships and networks. Evaluation of policy initiatives to promote social capital needs to go beyond indicators of conventional economic outcome measures such as jobs created and income generated and to encompass growth in the processes by which social capital works. Human capital in the form of education and skills possessed by individuals is linked with productivity and incomes. In the US, federal funding of human capital formation in support of rural entrepreneurship has been limited, fragmented and uncoordinated but activities in this area hold promise. The evaluation of entrepreneurial programmes needs to overcome many statistical problems such as selection bias regarding which firms received 'treatment' and how to identify causality. In particular there is a lack of indicators on the returns to investment in entrepreneurship. While the two case studies face their own sets of particular problems, they share the characteristic of a lack of data on relevant indicators that evaluators need in order to reach sound judgements. This points to the importance to evaluation of the design of the rural data system and scheme monitoring mechanisms.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)42-47
Number of pages6
JournalEuroChoices
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

social capital
human capital
entrepreneurship
evaluation
income
capital formation
lack
causality
rural area
EU
productivity
funding
education
monitoring
firm
policy
trend
economics
indicator

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Kinsella, Jim ; Goetz, Stephan J. ; Partridge, Mark D. ; Deller, Steven C. ; Fleming, David. / Die Evaluation von Politikmaßnahmen zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums zur Entwicklung von Sozial- und Humankapit. In: EuroChoices. 2010 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 42-47.
@article{281e0c4387034e0ea46d6a706f6a7486,
title = "Die Evaluation von Politikma{\ss}nahmen zur Entwicklung des l{\"a}ndlichen Raums zur Entwicklung von Sozial- und Humankapit",
abstract = "In the EU, building social capital and developing human capital are increasingly seen as key to development in rural areas. Social capital is fundamentally about human interrelationships and networks. Evaluation of policy initiatives to promote social capital needs to go beyond indicators of conventional economic outcome measures such as jobs created and income generated and to encompass growth in the processes by which social capital works. Human capital in the form of education and skills possessed by individuals is linked with productivity and incomes. In the US, federal funding of human capital formation in support of rural entrepreneurship has been limited, fragmented and uncoordinated but activities in this area hold promise. The evaluation of entrepreneurial programmes needs to overcome many statistical problems such as selection bias regarding which firms received 'treatment' and how to identify causality. In particular there is a lack of indicators on the returns to investment in entrepreneurship. While the two case studies face their own sets of particular problems, they share the characteristic of a lack of data on relevant indicators that evaluators need in order to reach sound judgements. This points to the importance to evaluation of the design of the rural data system and scheme monitoring mechanisms.",
author = "Jim Kinsella and Goetz, {Stephan J.} and Partridge, {Mark D.} and Deller, {Steven C.} and David Fleming",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00151.x",
language = "German",
volume = "9",
pages = "42--47",
journal = "EuroChoices",
issn = "1478-0917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Die Evaluation von Politikmaßnahmen zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums zur Entwicklung von Sozial- und Humankapit. / Kinsella, Jim; Goetz, Stephan J.; Partridge, Mark D.; Deller, Steven C.; Fleming, David.

In: EuroChoices, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.04.2010, p. 42-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Die Evaluation von Politikmaßnahmen zur Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums zur Entwicklung von Sozial- und Humankapit

AU - Kinsella, Jim

AU - Goetz, Stephan J.

AU - Partridge, Mark D.

AU - Deller, Steven C.

AU - Fleming, David

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - In the EU, building social capital and developing human capital are increasingly seen as key to development in rural areas. Social capital is fundamentally about human interrelationships and networks. Evaluation of policy initiatives to promote social capital needs to go beyond indicators of conventional economic outcome measures such as jobs created and income generated and to encompass growth in the processes by which social capital works. Human capital in the form of education and skills possessed by individuals is linked with productivity and incomes. In the US, federal funding of human capital formation in support of rural entrepreneurship has been limited, fragmented and uncoordinated but activities in this area hold promise. The evaluation of entrepreneurial programmes needs to overcome many statistical problems such as selection bias regarding which firms received 'treatment' and how to identify causality. In particular there is a lack of indicators on the returns to investment in entrepreneurship. While the two case studies face their own sets of particular problems, they share the characteristic of a lack of data on relevant indicators that evaluators need in order to reach sound judgements. This points to the importance to evaluation of the design of the rural data system and scheme monitoring mechanisms.

AB - In the EU, building social capital and developing human capital are increasingly seen as key to development in rural areas. Social capital is fundamentally about human interrelationships and networks. Evaluation of policy initiatives to promote social capital needs to go beyond indicators of conventional economic outcome measures such as jobs created and income generated and to encompass growth in the processes by which social capital works. Human capital in the form of education and skills possessed by individuals is linked with productivity and incomes. In the US, federal funding of human capital formation in support of rural entrepreneurship has been limited, fragmented and uncoordinated but activities in this area hold promise. The evaluation of entrepreneurial programmes needs to overcome many statistical problems such as selection bias regarding which firms received 'treatment' and how to identify causality. In particular there is a lack of indicators on the returns to investment in entrepreneurship. While the two case studies face their own sets of particular problems, they share the characteristic of a lack of data on relevant indicators that evaluators need in order to reach sound judgements. This points to the importance to evaluation of the design of the rural data system and scheme monitoring mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953092458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953092458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00151.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00151.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953092458

VL - 9

SP - 42

EP - 47

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

SN - 1478-0917

IS - 1

ER -