Evaluating Reasons for Nursing Turnover: Comparison of Exit Interview and Panel Data

Carol S. Weisman, Cheryl S. Alexander, Gary A. Chase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data from a study of nursing turnover are used to compare findings based on two techniques for evaluating the reasons for resignations within the same population of hospital nurses during one year. The techniques are: (1) exit interviews, in which resigning nurses were asked to report in an open-ended format their major reasons for leaving their jobs; and (2) a prospective panel study, in which nurses who resigned are compared with nurses who remained, and actual turnover is predicted. Results show that due to the absence of a compari son group of remaining nurses and of baseline data, causal inferences based on exit interview data alone are overly simplistic and misleading for management purposes. Results of thepanel study are more inform ative, although implications for hospital management are more complex. Use of the prospective panel design is recommended for hospitals concerned with evaluating nursing job conditions during a period of high turnover and staff nurse shortages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-127
Number of pages21
JournalEvaluation & the Health Professions
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

Fingerprint

Nursing
Nurses
Interviews
Nuclear Family
Prospective Studies
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{57cfdd926f9b44f7bd31116429cb0ad9,
title = "Evaluating Reasons for Nursing Turnover: Comparison of Exit Interview and Panel Data",
abstract = "Data from a study of nursing turnover are used to compare findings based on two techniques for evaluating the reasons for resignations within the same population of hospital nurses during one year. The techniques are: (1) exit interviews, in which resigning nurses were asked to report in an open-ended format their major reasons for leaving their jobs; and (2) a prospective panel study, in which nurses who resigned are compared with nurses who remained, and actual turnover is predicted. Results show that due to the absence of a compari son group of remaining nurses and of baseline data, causal inferences based on exit interview data alone are overly simplistic and misleading for management purposes. Results of thepanel study are more inform ative, although implications for hospital management are more complex. Use of the prospective panel design is recommended for hospitals concerned with evaluating nursing job conditions during a period of high turnover and staff nurse shortages.",
author = "Weisman, {Carol S.} and Alexander, {Cheryl S.} and Chase, {Gary A.}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/016327878100400201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "107--127",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Evaluating Reasons for Nursing Turnover : Comparison of Exit Interview and Panel Data. / Weisman, Carol S.; Alexander, Cheryl S.; Chase, Gary A.

In: Evaluation & the Health Professions, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.01.1981, p. 107-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating Reasons for Nursing Turnover

T2 - Comparison of Exit Interview and Panel Data

AU - Weisman, Carol S.

AU - Alexander, Cheryl S.

AU - Chase, Gary A.

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - Data from a study of nursing turnover are used to compare findings based on two techniques for evaluating the reasons for resignations within the same population of hospital nurses during one year. The techniques are: (1) exit interviews, in which resigning nurses were asked to report in an open-ended format their major reasons for leaving their jobs; and (2) a prospective panel study, in which nurses who resigned are compared with nurses who remained, and actual turnover is predicted. Results show that due to the absence of a compari son group of remaining nurses and of baseline data, causal inferences based on exit interview data alone are overly simplistic and misleading for management purposes. Results of thepanel study are more inform ative, although implications for hospital management are more complex. Use of the prospective panel design is recommended for hospitals concerned with evaluating nursing job conditions during a period of high turnover and staff nurse shortages.

AB - Data from a study of nursing turnover are used to compare findings based on two techniques for evaluating the reasons for resignations within the same population of hospital nurses during one year. The techniques are: (1) exit interviews, in which resigning nurses were asked to report in an open-ended format their major reasons for leaving their jobs; and (2) a prospective panel study, in which nurses who resigned are compared with nurses who remained, and actual turnover is predicted. Results show that due to the absence of a compari son group of remaining nurses and of baseline data, causal inferences based on exit interview data alone are overly simplistic and misleading for management purposes. Results of thepanel study are more inform ative, although implications for hospital management are more complex. Use of the prospective panel design is recommended for hospitals concerned with evaluating nursing job conditions during a period of high turnover and staff nurse shortages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019830598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019830598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/016327878100400201

DO - 10.1177/016327878100400201

M3 - Article

C2 - 10251726

AN - SCOPUS:0019830598

VL - 4

SP - 107

EP - 127

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 2

ER -