Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of approaches to nasogastric tube insertion during trauma care

Janice M. Morse, Janice Penrod, Cathy Kassab, Cheryl Dellasega

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Numerous invasive, uncomfortable, and discomforting procedures are implemented almost routinely during trauma care. Previous research has shown that trauma care practitioners use comforting strategies during this care. Yet little is known of the effect of these comforting strategies on the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment. Objectives To evaluate the effect of the caregiver's approach on the efficient and effective completion of a discomforting procedure (nasogastric tube insertion) on conscious patients during trauma care. Methods Ethology was used to analyze 32 attempts at nasogastric tube insertion from 193 videotaped trauma cases from 3 level I trauma centers in North America. Both qualitative and quantitative analytic techniques were used. Results The practitioner's approach was associated with the outcome of the treatment. Overall, practitioners who balanced the technical aspects of the procedure with use of comforting strategies to minimize the patient's discomfort (the blended approach) were most efficient and most effective in completing this procedure. Practitioners who were most attentive to procedural technique (with little respect to patients' discomfort) or who were overly attentive to comforting strategies (termed the technical and affective approaches, respectively) took longer and/or were less successful at completing the procedure. Conclusions Four patterned, standardized approaches to care were found: technical, affective, blended, and mixed. This study has implications for further research into the effect of the practitioner's approach on the patient's behavioral state in trauma care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-333
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Critical Care
Volume9
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2000

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Ethology
Trauma Centers
North America
Research
Caregivers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{2fd77c0392f54fccb32467e30d32e266,
title = "Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of approaches to nasogastric tube insertion during trauma care",
abstract = "Background Numerous invasive, uncomfortable, and discomforting procedures are implemented almost routinely during trauma care. Previous research has shown that trauma care practitioners use comforting strategies during this care. Yet little is known of the effect of these comforting strategies on the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment. Objectives To evaluate the effect of the caregiver's approach on the efficient and effective completion of a discomforting procedure (nasogastric tube insertion) on conscious patients during trauma care. Methods Ethology was used to analyze 32 attempts at nasogastric tube insertion from 193 videotaped trauma cases from 3 level I trauma centers in North America. Both qualitative and quantitative analytic techniques were used. Results The practitioner's approach was associated with the outcome of the treatment. Overall, practitioners who balanced the technical aspects of the procedure with use of comforting strategies to minimize the patient's discomfort (the blended approach) were most efficient and most effective in completing this procedure. Practitioners who were most attentive to procedural technique (with little respect to patients' discomfort) or who were overly attentive to comforting strategies (termed the technical and affective approaches, respectively) took longer and/or were less successful at completing the procedure. Conclusions Four patterned, standardized approaches to care were found: technical, affective, blended, and mixed. This study has implications for further research into the effect of the practitioner's approach on the patient's behavioral state in trauma care.",
author = "Morse, {Janice M.} and Janice Penrod and Cathy Kassab and Cheryl Dellasega",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "325--333",
journal = "American Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "1062-3264",
publisher = "American Association of Critical Care Nurses",
number = "5",

}

Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of approaches to nasogastric tube insertion during trauma care. / Morse, Janice M.; Penrod, Janice; Kassab, Cathy; Dellasega, Cheryl.

In: American Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 9, No. 5, 09.2000, p. 325-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of approaches to nasogastric tube insertion during trauma care

AU - Morse, Janice M.

AU - Penrod, Janice

AU - Kassab, Cathy

AU - Dellasega, Cheryl

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - Background Numerous invasive, uncomfortable, and discomforting procedures are implemented almost routinely during trauma care. Previous research has shown that trauma care practitioners use comforting strategies during this care. Yet little is known of the effect of these comforting strategies on the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment. Objectives To evaluate the effect of the caregiver's approach on the efficient and effective completion of a discomforting procedure (nasogastric tube insertion) on conscious patients during trauma care. Methods Ethology was used to analyze 32 attempts at nasogastric tube insertion from 193 videotaped trauma cases from 3 level I trauma centers in North America. Both qualitative and quantitative analytic techniques were used. Results The practitioner's approach was associated with the outcome of the treatment. Overall, practitioners who balanced the technical aspects of the procedure with use of comforting strategies to minimize the patient's discomfort (the blended approach) were most efficient and most effective in completing this procedure. Practitioners who were most attentive to procedural technique (with little respect to patients' discomfort) or who were overly attentive to comforting strategies (termed the technical and affective approaches, respectively) took longer and/or were less successful at completing the procedure. Conclusions Four patterned, standardized approaches to care were found: technical, affective, blended, and mixed. This study has implications for further research into the effect of the practitioner's approach on the patient's behavioral state in trauma care.

AB - Background Numerous invasive, uncomfortable, and discomforting procedures are implemented almost routinely during trauma care. Previous research has shown that trauma care practitioners use comforting strategies during this care. Yet little is known of the effect of these comforting strategies on the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment. Objectives To evaluate the effect of the caregiver's approach on the efficient and effective completion of a discomforting procedure (nasogastric tube insertion) on conscious patients during trauma care. Methods Ethology was used to analyze 32 attempts at nasogastric tube insertion from 193 videotaped trauma cases from 3 level I trauma centers in North America. Both qualitative and quantitative analytic techniques were used. Results The practitioner's approach was associated with the outcome of the treatment. Overall, practitioners who balanced the technical aspects of the procedure with use of comforting strategies to minimize the patient's discomfort (the blended approach) were most efficient and most effective in completing this procedure. Practitioners who were most attentive to procedural technique (with little respect to patients' discomfort) or who were overly attentive to comforting strategies (termed the technical and affective approaches, respectively) took longer and/or were less successful at completing the procedure. Conclusions Four patterned, standardized approaches to care were found: technical, affective, blended, and mixed. This study has implications for further research into the effect of the practitioner's approach on the patient's behavioral state in trauma care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034268260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034268260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 325

EP - 333

JO - American Journal of Critical Care

JF - American Journal of Critical Care

SN - 1062-3264

IS - 5

ER -