Evaluation of a graphical design interface for design space visualization

Timothy William Simpson, Martin Meckesheimer

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There have been remarkable advances in the use of visualization to support engineering design and decision-making; however, few studies have assessed the impact of having a fast graphical design interface for design space visualization. Results from an initial study conducted to evaluate the use of a prototypical graphical design interface (GDI) for design space visualization that has been developed for an aircraft wing design example are presented. The objective in this initial study is to investigate how engineers, statisticians, and optimizers (i.e., mathematicians) interact with the GDI and assess how the capabilities of the GDI impact the user's ability to find the optimal design as a function of response delay and constraint violation display. Twenty-two users participated in the study. Due to the small sample size, few significant results were achieved; however, some interesting findings and trends were observed. Delay did have a significant impact on the number of points plotted, but not on the percent error or completion time, whereas the constraint violation display condition did affect the search strategy employed by the user in the GDI. We found that the fewer constraint violations displayed, the more freedom users felt they had to explore the design space for good designs. Feedback from users was generally positive, and several specific suggestions for improvement were offered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1898-1908
Number of pages11
JournalCollection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
Volume3
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004

Fingerprint

Visualization
Display devices
Decision making
Feedback
Engineers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Architecture
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

@article{3081dbed7d104483b6aaf1fc0baea338,
title = "Evaluation of a graphical design interface for design space visualization",
abstract = "There have been remarkable advances in the use of visualization to support engineering design and decision-making; however, few studies have assessed the impact of having a fast graphical design interface for design space visualization. Results from an initial study conducted to evaluate the use of a prototypical graphical design interface (GDI) for design space visualization that has been developed for an aircraft wing design example are presented. The objective in this initial study is to investigate how engineers, statisticians, and optimizers (i.e., mathematicians) interact with the GDI and assess how the capabilities of the GDI impact the user's ability to find the optimal design as a function of response delay and constraint violation display. Twenty-two users participated in the study. Due to the small sample size, few significant results were achieved; however, some interesting findings and trends were observed. Delay did have a significant impact on the number of points plotted, but not on the percent error or completion time, whereas the constraint violation display condition did affect the search strategy employed by the user in the GDI. We found that the fewer constraint violations displayed, the more freedom users felt they had to explore the design space for good designs. Feedback from users was generally positive, and several specific suggestions for improvement were offered.",
author = "Simpson, {Timothy William} and Martin Meckesheimer",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "1898--1908",
journal = "Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference",
issn = "0273-4508",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a graphical design interface for design space visualization

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

AU - Meckesheimer, Martin

PY - 2004/12/1

Y1 - 2004/12/1

N2 - There have been remarkable advances in the use of visualization to support engineering design and decision-making; however, few studies have assessed the impact of having a fast graphical design interface for design space visualization. Results from an initial study conducted to evaluate the use of a prototypical graphical design interface (GDI) for design space visualization that has been developed for an aircraft wing design example are presented. The objective in this initial study is to investigate how engineers, statisticians, and optimizers (i.e., mathematicians) interact with the GDI and assess how the capabilities of the GDI impact the user's ability to find the optimal design as a function of response delay and constraint violation display. Twenty-two users participated in the study. Due to the small sample size, few significant results were achieved; however, some interesting findings and trends were observed. Delay did have a significant impact on the number of points plotted, but not on the percent error or completion time, whereas the constraint violation display condition did affect the search strategy employed by the user in the GDI. We found that the fewer constraint violations displayed, the more freedom users felt they had to explore the design space for good designs. Feedback from users was generally positive, and several specific suggestions for improvement were offered.

AB - There have been remarkable advances in the use of visualization to support engineering design and decision-making; however, few studies have assessed the impact of having a fast graphical design interface for design space visualization. Results from an initial study conducted to evaluate the use of a prototypical graphical design interface (GDI) for design space visualization that has been developed for an aircraft wing design example are presented. The objective in this initial study is to investigate how engineers, statisticians, and optimizers (i.e., mathematicians) interact with the GDI and assess how the capabilities of the GDI impact the user's ability to find the optimal design as a function of response delay and constraint violation display. Twenty-two users participated in the study. Due to the small sample size, few significant results were achieved; however, some interesting findings and trends were observed. Delay did have a significant impact on the number of points plotted, but not on the percent error or completion time, whereas the constraint violation display condition did affect the search strategy employed by the user in the GDI. We found that the fewer constraint violations displayed, the more freedom users felt they had to explore the design space for good designs. Feedback from users was generally positive, and several specific suggestions for improvement were offered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16244374921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16244374921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:16244374921

VL - 3

SP - 1898

EP - 1908

JO - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

JF - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference

SN - 0273-4508

ER -