Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis ii: Comparative results

Vassilis K. Papanikolaou, Amr S. Elnashai, Juan F. Pareja

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, the methodology for evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis presented in a companion paper is applied to a set of eight different reinforced concrete buildings, covering various levels of irregularity in plan and elevation, structural ductility and directional effects. An extensive series of pushover analysis results, monitored on various levels is presented and compared to inelastic dynamic analysis under various strong motion records, using a new quantitative measure. It is concluded that advanced (adaptive) pushover analysis often gives results superior to those from conventional pushover. However, the consistency of the improvement is unreliable. It is also emphasised that global response parameter comparisons often give an incomplete and sometimes even misleading impression of the performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-151
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Earthquake Engineering
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis ii: Comparative results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this