Evaluation of fracture predilection in the calcaneus after external fixator pin removal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: External fixators have been advocated for the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia, so-called "pilon" or "plafond" fractures. Current recommendations include placement of external fixator pins, which vary in diameters up to six millimeters, in the talus and calcaneus. Removal of a relatively large pin may create a large defect in the bone, theoretically increasing fracture predilection with weight bearing. The objective was to compare the compressive load at failure of intact and formerly instrumented calcanei. It was hypothesized that the pin hole defect would not lead to a clinically significant difference in compressive load at failure. Study Design: A biomechanical evaluation of randomized matched pairs of cadaveric calcanei. Methods: Fresh human calcanei were harvested, embedded in casting compound, and tested pairwise. Among pairs of cal-canei, one served as the control, and the other was drilled with a 6.0-mm pin in the posterior portion. The pin was removed before biomechanical evaluation. Testing was performed in compression under displacement control on a hydraulic materials testing system. Results: There was a 22% reduction in compressive load at failure (p = 0.021) of the drilled versus intact specimens. Compared with intact calcanei, defect calcanei had a compressive failure load much closer to forces that might be encountered with walking and running. Conclusions: The six-millimeter-pin defect is a significant stress riser, and protected, progressive weight bearing after pin removal should be recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-434
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

External Fixators
Calcaneus
Weight-Bearing
Intra-Articular Fractures
Materials Testing
Talus
Tibia
Running
Walking
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{c38e05ead8c54066973d2637ca76c59b,
title = "Evaluation of fracture predilection in the calcaneus after external fixator pin removal",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: External fixators have been advocated for the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia, so-called {"}pilon{"} or {"}plafond{"} fractures. Current recommendations include placement of external fixator pins, which vary in diameters up to six millimeters, in the talus and calcaneus. Removal of a relatively large pin may create a large defect in the bone, theoretically increasing fracture predilection with weight bearing. The objective was to compare the compressive load at failure of intact and formerly instrumented calcanei. It was hypothesized that the pin hole defect would not lead to a clinically significant difference in compressive load at failure. Study Design: A biomechanical evaluation of randomized matched pairs of cadaveric calcanei. Methods: Fresh human calcanei were harvested, embedded in casting compound, and tested pairwise. Among pairs of cal-canei, one served as the control, and the other was drilled with a 6.0-mm pin in the posterior portion. The pin was removed before biomechanical evaluation. Testing was performed in compression under displacement control on a hydraulic materials testing system. Results: There was a 22{\%} reduction in compressive load at failure (p = 0.021) of the drilled versus intact specimens. Compared with intact calcanei, defect calcanei had a compressive failure load much closer to forces that might be encountered with walking and running. Conclusions: The six-millimeter-pin defect is a significant stress riser, and protected, progressive weight bearing after pin removal should be recommended.",
author = "Paul Juliano",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005131-199708000-00012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "430--434",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Evaluation of fracture predilection in the calcaneus after external fixator pin removal. / Juliano, Paul.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.01.1997, p. 430-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of fracture predilection in the calcaneus after external fixator pin removal

AU - Juliano, Paul

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: External fixators have been advocated for the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia, so-called "pilon" or "plafond" fractures. Current recommendations include placement of external fixator pins, which vary in diameters up to six millimeters, in the talus and calcaneus. Removal of a relatively large pin may create a large defect in the bone, theoretically increasing fracture predilection with weight bearing. The objective was to compare the compressive load at failure of intact and formerly instrumented calcanei. It was hypothesized that the pin hole defect would not lead to a clinically significant difference in compressive load at failure. Study Design: A biomechanical evaluation of randomized matched pairs of cadaveric calcanei. Methods: Fresh human calcanei were harvested, embedded in casting compound, and tested pairwise. Among pairs of cal-canei, one served as the control, and the other was drilled with a 6.0-mm pin in the posterior portion. The pin was removed before biomechanical evaluation. Testing was performed in compression under displacement control on a hydraulic materials testing system. Results: There was a 22% reduction in compressive load at failure (p = 0.021) of the drilled versus intact specimens. Compared with intact calcanei, defect calcanei had a compressive failure load much closer to forces that might be encountered with walking and running. Conclusions: The six-millimeter-pin defect is a significant stress riser, and protected, progressive weight bearing after pin removal should be recommended.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: External fixators have been advocated for the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia, so-called "pilon" or "plafond" fractures. Current recommendations include placement of external fixator pins, which vary in diameters up to six millimeters, in the talus and calcaneus. Removal of a relatively large pin may create a large defect in the bone, theoretically increasing fracture predilection with weight bearing. The objective was to compare the compressive load at failure of intact and formerly instrumented calcanei. It was hypothesized that the pin hole defect would not lead to a clinically significant difference in compressive load at failure. Study Design: A biomechanical evaluation of randomized matched pairs of cadaveric calcanei. Methods: Fresh human calcanei were harvested, embedded in casting compound, and tested pairwise. Among pairs of cal-canei, one served as the control, and the other was drilled with a 6.0-mm pin in the posterior portion. The pin was removed before biomechanical evaluation. Testing was performed in compression under displacement control on a hydraulic materials testing system. Results: There was a 22% reduction in compressive load at failure (p = 0.021) of the drilled versus intact specimens. Compared with intact calcanei, defect calcanei had a compressive failure load much closer to forces that might be encountered with walking and running. Conclusions: The six-millimeter-pin defect is a significant stress riser, and protected, progressive weight bearing after pin removal should be recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031204535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031204535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005131-199708000-00012

DO - 10.1097/00005131-199708000-00012

M3 - Article

C2 - 9314151

AN - SCOPUS:0031204535

VL - 11

SP - 430

EP - 434

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 6

ER -