TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of machine learning methodologies using simple physics based conceptual models for flow in porous media
AU - Magzymov, Daulet
AU - Ratnakar, Ram R.
AU - Dindoruk, Birol
AU - Johns, Russell T.
N1 - Funding Information:
Depending on the nature of the physical problems and size/quality of the dataset, some methods may perform better than others. However, such dependency is eliminated in this work, as we generated clean datasets with a sufficient number of data points by solving the physics-based models. Therefore, any method could be utilized. For example, we explored a few of the most common methods, namely the quadratic support vector machine (SVM), squared exponential Gaussian process regression (GPR), random forest, linear regression, and neural networks. Seven variables (listed in Table 1) were input, while the speed of the front Λfront was the only output. While other output variables could also be considered, the SVM method supports only one output variable, therefore we selected the front speed as the output for this purpose.This work is partially supported by the member companies at the Interaction of Phase Behavior and Flow Consortium in the Department of Petroleum Engineering at University of Houston. The authors also thank Prof. S.M. Farouq Ali and Artificial Intelligence, (AI) Machine Learning and Data Analytics (DA) in Energy Exploration and Production (AIM-DEEP) Consortium for the support. Prof. Birol Dindoruk holds the American Association of Drilling Engineers Endowed Chair in the Department of Petroleum Engineering, at University of Houston. Prof. Russell T. Johns holds the George E. Trimble Chair in Earth and Mineral Sciences in the Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, at The Pennsylvania State University.
Funding Information:
This work is partially supported by the member companies at the Interaction of Phase Behavior and Flow Consortium in the Department of Petroleum Engineering at University of Houston . The authors also thank Prof. S.M. Farouq Ali and Artificial Intelligence, (AI) Machine Learning and Data Analytics (DA) in Energy Exploration and Production (AIM-DEEP) Consortium for the support. Prof. Birol Dindoruk holds the American Association of Drilling Engineers Endowed Chair in the Department of Petroleum Engineering, at University of Houston . Prof. Russell T. Johns holds the George E. Trimble Chair in Earth and Mineral Sciences in the Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering, at The Pennsylvania State University .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Machine learning (ML) techniques have drawn much attention in the engineering community due to recent advances in computational techniques and an enabling environment. However, often they are treated as black-box tools, which should be examined for their robustness and range of validity/applicability. This research presents an evaluation of their application to flow/transport in porous media, where exact solutions (obtained from physics-based models) are used to train ML algorithms to establish when and how these ML algorithms fail to predict the first order flow-physics. Exact solutions are used so as not to introduce artifacts from the numerical solutions. To test, validate, and predict the physics of flow in porous media using ML algorithms, one needs a reliable set of data that may not be readily available and/or the data might not be in suitable form (i.e. incomplete/missing reporting, metadata, or other relevant peripheral information). To overcome this, we first generated structured datasets for flow in porous media using simple representative building blocks of flow physics such as Buckley-Leverett, convection-dispersion equations, and viscous fingering. Then, the outcomes from those equations are fed into ML algorithms to examine their robustness and predictive strength of the key features, such as breakthrough time, and saturation and component profiles. In this research, we show that a physics-informed ML algorithm can capture the physical behavior and effects of various physical parameters (even when shocks and sharp gradients are present) on the features of the flow. Furthermore the ML approach can be utilized to solve inverse problems to estimate various physical parameters. In this study, we have focused on capturing the dominant flow physics on selected processes constituting the outcome of the physics of flow in porous media using ML algorithms. We expect that capturing the physics per selected processes can help solving more complex problems by providing correlative physical proxies.
AB - Machine learning (ML) techniques have drawn much attention in the engineering community due to recent advances in computational techniques and an enabling environment. However, often they are treated as black-box tools, which should be examined for their robustness and range of validity/applicability. This research presents an evaluation of their application to flow/transport in porous media, where exact solutions (obtained from physics-based models) are used to train ML algorithms to establish when and how these ML algorithms fail to predict the first order flow-physics. Exact solutions are used so as not to introduce artifacts from the numerical solutions. To test, validate, and predict the physics of flow in porous media using ML algorithms, one needs a reliable set of data that may not be readily available and/or the data might not be in suitable form (i.e. incomplete/missing reporting, metadata, or other relevant peripheral information). To overcome this, we first generated structured datasets for flow in porous media using simple representative building blocks of flow physics such as Buckley-Leverett, convection-dispersion equations, and viscous fingering. Then, the outcomes from those equations are fed into ML algorithms to examine their robustness and predictive strength of the key features, such as breakthrough time, and saturation and component profiles. In this research, we show that a physics-informed ML algorithm can capture the physical behavior and effects of various physical parameters (even when shocks and sharp gradients are present) on the features of the flow. Furthermore the ML approach can be utilized to solve inverse problems to estimate various physical parameters. In this study, we have focused on capturing the dominant flow physics on selected processes constituting the outcome of the physics of flow in porous media using ML algorithms. We expect that capturing the physics per selected processes can help solving more complex problems by providing correlative physical proxies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138809390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138809390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111056
DO - 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111056
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138809390
SN - 0920-4105
VL - 219
JO - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
JF - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
M1 - 111056
ER -