Evaluation of sensor failure detection, identification and accommodation (SFDIA) performance following common-mode failures of pitot tubes

Srikanth Gururajan, Mario Luca Fravolini, Matthew Rhudy, Antonio Moschitta, Marcello Napolitano

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent catastrophic air crashes have shown that physical redundancy is not a foolproof option for failures on Air Data Systems (ADS) on an aircraft providing airspeed measurements. Since all the redundant sensors are subjected to the same environmental conditions in flight, a failure on one sensor could occur on the other sensors under certain conditions such as extreme weather; this class of failure is known in the literature as "common mode" failure. In this paper, different approaches to the problem of detection, identification and accommodation of failures on the Air Data System (ADS) of an aircraft are evaluated. This task can be divided into component tasks of equal criticality as Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) and Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA). Data from flight test experiments conducted using the WVU YF-22 unmanned research aircraft are used. Analytical redundancy is provided through a least squares modeling based approach and an extended Kalman filter approach to handle the Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA) task. From experiments, it is seen that both these approaches provide reasonable estimates of airspeed with an average estimation error of 0.533 m/s and standard deviation of 1.6446 m/s. Furthermore two approaches to the task of Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) based on different fault detection filters were evaluated. A Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) detector and the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) detector were evaluated for different failure conditions - a sudden step bias, a fast rising fault and a slow rising fault in the measured airspeed and compared in terms of sensitivity to the failure magnitude, detection delay, false alarms and undetected faults. It was determined that on an average, the CUSUM filter performed slightly better in terms of detecting failures than the GLRT based detection for the given set of data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSAE Technical Papers
Volume2014-September
Issue numberSeptember
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 16 2014
EventSAE 2014 Aerospace Systems and Technology Conference, ASTC 2014 - Cincinnati, United States
Duration: Sep 23 2014Sep 25 2014

Fingerprint

Failure modes
Sensors
Redundancy
Air
Aircraft
Research aircraft
Detectors
Extended Kalman filters
Fault detection
Error analysis
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Pollution
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Gururajan, Srikanth ; Fravolini, Mario Luca ; Rhudy, Matthew ; Moschitta, Antonio ; Napolitano, Marcello. / Evaluation of sensor failure detection, identification and accommodation (SFDIA) performance following common-mode failures of pitot tubes. In: SAE Technical Papers. 2014 ; Vol. 2014-September, No. September.
@article{852729f7b9a448dc9bbf4f22a475f3e3,
title = "Evaluation of sensor failure detection, identification and accommodation (SFDIA) performance following common-mode failures of pitot tubes",
abstract = "Recent catastrophic air crashes have shown that physical redundancy is not a foolproof option for failures on Air Data Systems (ADS) on an aircraft providing airspeed measurements. Since all the redundant sensors are subjected to the same environmental conditions in flight, a failure on one sensor could occur on the other sensors under certain conditions such as extreme weather; this class of failure is known in the literature as {"}common mode{"} failure. In this paper, different approaches to the problem of detection, identification and accommodation of failures on the Air Data System (ADS) of an aircraft are evaluated. This task can be divided into component tasks of equal criticality as Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) and Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA). Data from flight test experiments conducted using the WVU YF-22 unmanned research aircraft are used. Analytical redundancy is provided through a least squares modeling based approach and an extended Kalman filter approach to handle the Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA) task. From experiments, it is seen that both these approaches provide reasonable estimates of airspeed with an average estimation error of 0.533 m/s and standard deviation of 1.6446 m/s. Furthermore two approaches to the task of Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) based on different fault detection filters were evaluated. A Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) detector and the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) detector were evaluated for different failure conditions - a sudden step bias, a fast rising fault and a slow rising fault in the measured airspeed and compared in terms of sensitivity to the failure magnitude, detection delay, false alarms and undetected faults. It was determined that on an average, the CUSUM filter performed slightly better in terms of detecting failures than the GLRT based detection for the given set of data.",
author = "Srikanth Gururajan and Fravolini, {Mario Luca} and Matthew Rhudy and Antonio Moschitta and Marcello Napolitano",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.4271/2014-01-2164",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2014-September",
journal = "SAE Technical Papers",
issn = "0148-7191",
publisher = "SAE International",
number = "September",

}

Evaluation of sensor failure detection, identification and accommodation (SFDIA) performance following common-mode failures of pitot tubes. / Gururajan, Srikanth; Fravolini, Mario Luca; Rhudy, Matthew; Moschitta, Antonio; Napolitano, Marcello.

In: SAE Technical Papers, Vol. 2014-September, No. September, 16.09.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of sensor failure detection, identification and accommodation (SFDIA) performance following common-mode failures of pitot tubes

AU - Gururajan, Srikanth

AU - Fravolini, Mario Luca

AU - Rhudy, Matthew

AU - Moschitta, Antonio

AU - Napolitano, Marcello

PY - 2014/9/16

Y1 - 2014/9/16

N2 - Recent catastrophic air crashes have shown that physical redundancy is not a foolproof option for failures on Air Data Systems (ADS) on an aircraft providing airspeed measurements. Since all the redundant sensors are subjected to the same environmental conditions in flight, a failure on one sensor could occur on the other sensors under certain conditions such as extreme weather; this class of failure is known in the literature as "common mode" failure. In this paper, different approaches to the problem of detection, identification and accommodation of failures on the Air Data System (ADS) of an aircraft are evaluated. This task can be divided into component tasks of equal criticality as Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) and Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA). Data from flight test experiments conducted using the WVU YF-22 unmanned research aircraft are used. Analytical redundancy is provided through a least squares modeling based approach and an extended Kalman filter approach to handle the Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA) task. From experiments, it is seen that both these approaches provide reasonable estimates of airspeed with an average estimation error of 0.533 m/s and standard deviation of 1.6446 m/s. Furthermore two approaches to the task of Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) based on different fault detection filters were evaluated. A Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) detector and the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) detector were evaluated for different failure conditions - a sudden step bias, a fast rising fault and a slow rising fault in the measured airspeed and compared in terms of sensitivity to the failure magnitude, detection delay, false alarms and undetected faults. It was determined that on an average, the CUSUM filter performed slightly better in terms of detecting failures than the GLRT based detection for the given set of data.

AB - Recent catastrophic air crashes have shown that physical redundancy is not a foolproof option for failures on Air Data Systems (ADS) on an aircraft providing airspeed measurements. Since all the redundant sensors are subjected to the same environmental conditions in flight, a failure on one sensor could occur on the other sensors under certain conditions such as extreme weather; this class of failure is known in the literature as "common mode" failure. In this paper, different approaches to the problem of detection, identification and accommodation of failures on the Air Data System (ADS) of an aircraft are evaluated. This task can be divided into component tasks of equal criticality as Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) and Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA). Data from flight test experiments conducted using the WVU YF-22 unmanned research aircraft are used. Analytical redundancy is provided through a least squares modeling based approach and an extended Kalman filter approach to handle the Sensor Failure Accommodation (SFA) task. From experiments, it is seen that both these approaches provide reasonable estimates of airspeed with an average estimation error of 0.533 m/s and standard deviation of 1.6446 m/s. Furthermore two approaches to the task of Sensor Failure Detection and Identification (SFDI) based on different fault detection filters were evaluated. A Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) detector and the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) detector were evaluated for different failure conditions - a sudden step bias, a fast rising fault and a slow rising fault in the measured airspeed and compared in terms of sensitivity to the failure magnitude, detection delay, false alarms and undetected faults. It was determined that on an average, the CUSUM filter performed slightly better in terms of detecting failures than the GLRT based detection for the given set of data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937779551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937779551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4271/2014-01-2164

DO - 10.4271/2014-01-2164

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:84937779551

VL - 2014-September

JO - SAE Technical Papers

JF - SAE Technical Papers

SN - 0148-7191

IS - September

ER -