Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma: is vein imaging in vain?

Zachary Masi, Kathryn Gussman, Joshua P. Hazelton, Ron Gefen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma. Methods: CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18–89 years, male 83%, female 17%) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together. Results: Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22%), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5%). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95%). Conclusions: The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-340
Number of pages6
JournalEmergency Radiology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Veins
Extremities
Wounds and Injuries
Computed Tomography Angiography
Vascular System Injuries
Lower Extremity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{c17b10353eda486ea87bf6b557696111,
title = "Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma: is vein imaging in vain?",
abstract = "Purpose: This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma. Methods: CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18–89 years, male 83{\%}, female 17{\%}) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together. Results: Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22{\%}), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5{\%}). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95{\%}). Conclusions: The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.",
author = "Zachary Masi and Kathryn Gussman and Hazelton, {Joshua P.} and Ron Gefen",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10140-017-1480-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "335--340",
journal = "Emergency Radiology",
issn = "1070-3004",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma : is vein imaging in vain? / Masi, Zachary; Gussman, Kathryn; Hazelton, Joshua P.; Gefen, Ron.

In: Emergency Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 335-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma

T2 - is vein imaging in vain?

AU - Masi, Zachary

AU - Gussman, Kathryn

AU - Hazelton, Joshua P.

AU - Gefen, Ron

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Purpose: This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma. Methods: CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18–89 years, male 83%, female 17%) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together. Results: Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22%), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5%). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95%). Conclusions: The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.

AB - Purpose: This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma. Methods: CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18–89 years, male 83%, female 17%) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together. Results: Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22%), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5%). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95%). Conclusions: The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011281919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011281919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10140-017-1480-z

DO - 10.1007/s10140-017-1480-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 28150047

AN - SCOPUS:85011281919

VL - 24

SP - 335

EP - 340

JO - Emergency Radiology

JF - Emergency Radiology

SN - 1070-3004

IS - 4

ER -