Evaluation of the relationship between one's differentiation of cognitive processes and metacognitive self-ratings

Xu Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is questionable whether people can provide accurate and credible metacognitive self-evaluations. This study examined the relationship between metacognitive self-assessment and the representation of cognitive processes. Fifty-four college students submitted written descriptions of different cognitive processes. Latent semantic analysis evaluated the descriptions with regard to each individual's differentiation among different processes at three stages: conditions, mental operations, and outcomes. Findings indicated that individuals with good selfratings differentiated different processes consistently at all three stages, whereas those with poor metacognitive self-ratings made clear distinctions between different processes in terms of conditions or outcomes of the processes, but much less so in terms of how the processes develop. The complex relationship between metacognitive self-perception and one's conceptual knowledge in this domain is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-255
Number of pages12
JournalBehavior research methods
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Semantics
Self Concept
Students
Self-Assessment
Evaluation
Cognitive Processes
Rating

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{219b5ebbab4d4535957f5f555b9a031e,
title = "Evaluation of the relationship between one's differentiation of cognitive processes and metacognitive self-ratings",
abstract = "It is questionable whether people can provide accurate and credible metacognitive self-evaluations. This study examined the relationship between metacognitive self-assessment and the representation of cognitive processes. Fifty-four college students submitted written descriptions of different cognitive processes. Latent semantic analysis evaluated the descriptions with regard to each individual's differentiation among different processes at three stages: conditions, mental operations, and outcomes. Findings indicated that individuals with good selfratings differentiated different processes consistently at all three stages, whereas those with poor metacognitive self-ratings made clear distinctions between different processes in terms of conditions or outcomes of the processes, but much less so in terms of how the processes develop. The complex relationship between metacognitive self-perception and one's conceptual knowledge in this domain is discussed.",
author = "Xu Xu",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BRM.41.1.244",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "244--255",
journal = "Behavior Research Methods",
issn = "1554-351X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation of the relationship between one's differentiation of cognitive processes and metacognitive self-ratings. / Xu, Xu.

In: Behavior research methods, Vol. 41, No. 1, 01.02.2009, p. 244-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the relationship between one's differentiation of cognitive processes and metacognitive self-ratings

AU - Xu, Xu

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - It is questionable whether people can provide accurate and credible metacognitive self-evaluations. This study examined the relationship between metacognitive self-assessment and the representation of cognitive processes. Fifty-four college students submitted written descriptions of different cognitive processes. Latent semantic analysis evaluated the descriptions with regard to each individual's differentiation among different processes at three stages: conditions, mental operations, and outcomes. Findings indicated that individuals with good selfratings differentiated different processes consistently at all three stages, whereas those with poor metacognitive self-ratings made clear distinctions between different processes in terms of conditions or outcomes of the processes, but much less so in terms of how the processes develop. The complex relationship between metacognitive self-perception and one's conceptual knowledge in this domain is discussed.

AB - It is questionable whether people can provide accurate and credible metacognitive self-evaluations. This study examined the relationship between metacognitive self-assessment and the representation of cognitive processes. Fifty-four college students submitted written descriptions of different cognitive processes. Latent semantic analysis evaluated the descriptions with regard to each individual's differentiation among different processes at three stages: conditions, mental operations, and outcomes. Findings indicated that individuals with good selfratings differentiated different processes consistently at all three stages, whereas those with poor metacognitive self-ratings made clear distinctions between different processes in terms of conditions or outcomes of the processes, but much less so in terms of how the processes develop. The complex relationship between metacognitive self-perception and one's conceptual knowledge in this domain is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65349100486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65349100486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BRM.41.1.244

DO - 10.3758/BRM.41.1.244

M3 - Article

C2 - 19182146

AN - SCOPUS:65349100486

VL - 41

SP - 244

EP - 255

JO - Behavior Research Methods

JF - Behavior Research Methods

SN - 1554-351X

IS - 1

ER -