Evaluation of three-dimensional printed materials for simulation by computed tomography and ultrasound imaging

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing allows for creation of custom models for clinical care, education, and simulation. Medical imaging, given the significant role it plays in both clinical diagnostics and procedures, remains an important area for such education and simulation. Unfortunately, the materials appropriate for use in simulation involving radiographic or ultrasound imaging remains poorly understood. Therefore, our study was intended to explore the characteristics of readily available 3D printing materials when visualized by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound. Methods: Seven 3D printing materials were examined in standard shapes (cube, cylinder, triangular prism) with a selection of printingmethods ( "open", "whole", and "solid" forms). For CT imaging, these objects were suspended in a gelatin matrix molded to match a standard human CT phantom. For ultrasound imaging, the objects were placed in acrylic forms filled with a gelatin matrix. All images were examined using OsiriX software. Results: Computed tomography imaging revealedmarked variation in materials' Hounsfield units as well as patterning and artifact. The Hounsfield unit variations revealed a number of materials suitable for simulation various human tissues. Ultrasound imaging showed echogenicity in allmaterials,with some variability in shadowing and posteriorwall visualization. Conclusions: Wewere able to demonstrate the potential utility for 3D printing in the creation of CT and ultrasound simulation models. The similar appearance of materials via ultrasound supports their broad utility for select tissue types, whereas the more variable appearance via CT suggests greater potential for simulating differing tissues but requiring multiple printer technologies to do so.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-188
Number of pages7
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Computed Tomography
Ultrasound
Tomography
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonics
Imaging
Imaging techniques
Three-dimensional
simulation
Printing
Evaluation
evaluation
Simulation
Gelatin
Tissue
Education
Triangular prism
Unit
printer
Shadowing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

@article{f0965ed15175420292e5303661e4ccab,
title = "Evaluation of three-dimensional printed materials for simulation by computed tomography and ultrasound imaging",
abstract = "Introduction: The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing allows for creation of custom models for clinical care, education, and simulation. Medical imaging, given the significant role it plays in both clinical diagnostics and procedures, remains an important area for such education and simulation. Unfortunately, the materials appropriate for use in simulation involving radiographic or ultrasound imaging remains poorly understood. Therefore, our study was intended to explore the characteristics of readily available 3D printing materials when visualized by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound. Methods: Seven 3D printing materials were examined in standard shapes (cube, cylinder, triangular prism) with a selection of printingmethods ( {"}open{"}, {"}whole{"}, and {"}solid{"} forms). For CT imaging, these objects were suspended in a gelatin matrix molded to match a standard human CT phantom. For ultrasound imaging, the objects were placed in acrylic forms filled with a gelatin matrix. All images were examined using OsiriX software. Results: Computed tomography imaging revealedmarked variation in materials' Hounsfield units as well as patterning and artifact. The Hounsfield unit variations revealed a number of materials suitable for simulation various human tissues. Ultrasound imaging showed echogenicity in allmaterials,with some variability in shadowing and posteriorwall visualization. Conclusions: Wewere able to demonstrate the potential utility for 3D printing in the creation of CT and ultrasound simulation models. The similar appearance of materials via ultrasound supports their broad utility for select tissue types, whereas the more variable appearance via CT suggests greater potential for simulating differing tissues but requiring multiple printer technologies to do so.",
author = "James Mooney and Nabeel Sarwani and Melissa Coleman and Joseph Fotos",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000217",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "182--188",
journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",
issn = "1559-2332",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of three-dimensional printed materials for simulation by computed tomography and ultrasound imaging

AU - Mooney, James

AU - Sarwani, Nabeel

AU - Coleman, Melissa

AU - Fotos, Joseph

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction: The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing allows for creation of custom models for clinical care, education, and simulation. Medical imaging, given the significant role it plays in both clinical diagnostics and procedures, remains an important area for such education and simulation. Unfortunately, the materials appropriate for use in simulation involving radiographic or ultrasound imaging remains poorly understood. Therefore, our study was intended to explore the characteristics of readily available 3D printing materials when visualized by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound. Methods: Seven 3D printing materials were examined in standard shapes (cube, cylinder, triangular prism) with a selection of printingmethods ( "open", "whole", and "solid" forms). For CT imaging, these objects were suspended in a gelatin matrix molded to match a standard human CT phantom. For ultrasound imaging, the objects were placed in acrylic forms filled with a gelatin matrix. All images were examined using OsiriX software. Results: Computed tomography imaging revealedmarked variation in materials' Hounsfield units as well as patterning and artifact. The Hounsfield unit variations revealed a number of materials suitable for simulation various human tissues. Ultrasound imaging showed echogenicity in allmaterials,with some variability in shadowing and posteriorwall visualization. Conclusions: Wewere able to demonstrate the potential utility for 3D printing in the creation of CT and ultrasound simulation models. The similar appearance of materials via ultrasound supports their broad utility for select tissue types, whereas the more variable appearance via CT suggests greater potential for simulating differing tissues but requiring multiple printer technologies to do so.

AB - Introduction: The use of three-dimensional (3D) printing allows for creation of custom models for clinical care, education, and simulation. Medical imaging, given the significant role it plays in both clinical diagnostics and procedures, remains an important area for such education and simulation. Unfortunately, the materials appropriate for use in simulation involving radiographic or ultrasound imaging remains poorly understood. Therefore, our study was intended to explore the characteristics of readily available 3D printing materials when visualized by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound. Methods: Seven 3D printing materials were examined in standard shapes (cube, cylinder, triangular prism) with a selection of printingmethods ( "open", "whole", and "solid" forms). For CT imaging, these objects were suspended in a gelatin matrix molded to match a standard human CT phantom. For ultrasound imaging, the objects were placed in acrylic forms filled with a gelatin matrix. All images were examined using OsiriX software. Results: Computed tomography imaging revealedmarked variation in materials' Hounsfield units as well as patterning and artifact. The Hounsfield unit variations revealed a number of materials suitable for simulation various human tissues. Ultrasound imaging showed echogenicity in allmaterials,with some variability in shadowing and posteriorwall visualization. Conclusions: Wewere able to demonstrate the potential utility for 3D printing in the creation of CT and ultrasound simulation models. The similar appearance of materials via ultrasound supports their broad utility for select tissue types, whereas the more variable appearance via CT suggests greater potential for simulating differing tissues but requiring multiple printer technologies to do so.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011690483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011690483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000217

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000217

M3 - Article

C2 - 28166189

AN - SCOPUS:85011690483

VL - 12

SP - 182

EP - 188

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

SN - 1559-2332

IS - 3

ER -