Evaluation practices for college students with LD

Nicole S. Ofiesh, James Kenneth McAfee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To examine current practices in the use of psychoeducational evaluations for service delivery, we surveyed 91 service providers to college students with learning disabilities. The three purposes of the survey were to determine (a) whether service delivery decisions are based on information from psychoeducational evaluations, (b) which sections of the psychoeducational report are most useful in making service delivery decisions, and (c) the respondents' satisfaction with the tests and measurements for service delivery. The findings supported the common belief that data from psychoeducational evaluations serve as the primary basis for both eligibility and specific accommodation determinations. Respondents reported that all sections of the psychoeducational evaluation written report were useful, with the least useful section being test scores and the most useful being the summary of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. However, the section used most often for service delivery decisions was the professional's recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-25
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Learning Disabilities
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Students
Learning Disorders
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Ofiesh, Nicole S. ; McAfee, James Kenneth. / Evaluation practices for college students with LD. In: Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2000 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 14-25.
@article{8f223a797199402483b1ba77e0d9b4b5,
title = "Evaluation practices for college students with LD",
abstract = "To examine current practices in the use of psychoeducational evaluations for service delivery, we surveyed 91 service providers to college students with learning disabilities. The three purposes of the survey were to determine (a) whether service delivery decisions are based on information from psychoeducational evaluations, (b) which sections of the psychoeducational report are most useful in making service delivery decisions, and (c) the respondents' satisfaction with the tests and measurements for service delivery. The findings supported the common belief that data from psychoeducational evaluations serve as the primary basis for both eligibility and specific accommodation determinations. Respondents reported that all sections of the psychoeducational evaluation written report were useful, with the least useful section being test scores and the most useful being the summary of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. However, the section used most often for service delivery decisions was the professional's recommendations.",
author = "Ofiesh, {Nicole S.} and McAfee, {James Kenneth}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002221940003300105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "14--25",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1744-6295",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Evaluation practices for college students with LD. / Ofiesh, Nicole S.; McAfee, James Kenneth.

In: Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 14-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation practices for college students with LD

AU - Ofiesh, Nicole S.

AU - McAfee, James Kenneth

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - To examine current practices in the use of psychoeducational evaluations for service delivery, we surveyed 91 service providers to college students with learning disabilities. The three purposes of the survey were to determine (a) whether service delivery decisions are based on information from psychoeducational evaluations, (b) which sections of the psychoeducational report are most useful in making service delivery decisions, and (c) the respondents' satisfaction with the tests and measurements for service delivery. The findings supported the common belief that data from psychoeducational evaluations serve as the primary basis for both eligibility and specific accommodation determinations. Respondents reported that all sections of the psychoeducational evaluation written report were useful, with the least useful section being test scores and the most useful being the summary of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. However, the section used most often for service delivery decisions was the professional's recommendations.

AB - To examine current practices in the use of psychoeducational evaluations for service delivery, we surveyed 91 service providers to college students with learning disabilities. The three purposes of the survey were to determine (a) whether service delivery decisions are based on information from psychoeducational evaluations, (b) which sections of the psychoeducational report are most useful in making service delivery decisions, and (c) the respondents' satisfaction with the tests and measurements for service delivery. The findings supported the common belief that data from psychoeducational evaluations serve as the primary basis for both eligibility and specific accommodation determinations. Respondents reported that all sections of the psychoeducational evaluation written report were useful, with the least useful section being test scores and the most useful being the summary of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. However, the section used most often for service delivery decisions was the professional's recommendations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347373560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347373560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002221940003300105

DO - 10.1177/002221940003300105

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15505952

AN - SCOPUS:0347373560

VL - 33

SP - 14

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1744-6295

IS - 1

ER -