Everyone else is doing it

The association between social identity and susceptibility to peer influence in NCAA athletes

Scott A. Graupensperger, Alex J. Benson, Michael Blair Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined athletes' conformity to teammates' risky behaviors through a performance-based manipulation paradigm. They hypothesized that athletes who strongly identified with their team would be at increased risk of conforming to teammates' behaviors. Athletes (N = 379) from 23 intact National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) teams completed surveys (e.g., social identity) and reported the extent to which they would engage in risky behavior scenarios (e.g., drinking and driving). Then, researchers displayed ostensible responses that were manipulated to appear as though teammates reported high engagement in the risky behaviors. Finally, athletes again responded to the hypothetical scenarios and a conformity index was created. Results indicated that social identity, at both individual and group levels, positively predicted conformity- indicating that athletes with stronger social identities are more susceptible to peer influence. Although these findings highlight a pernicious aspect of social identity, they also provide insight into how group-level processes could be leveraged to prevent risky behaviors in student-athletes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-127
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Social Identification
Athletes
Sports
Group Processes
Peer Influence
Research Personnel
Students

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{f71e3b509c3e42dc9f836c31c3111ed5,
title = "Everyone else is doing it: The association between social identity and susceptibility to peer influence in NCAA athletes",
abstract = "The authors examined athletes' conformity to teammates' risky behaviors through a performance-based manipulation paradigm. They hypothesized that athletes who strongly identified with their team would be at increased risk of conforming to teammates' behaviors. Athletes (N = 379) from 23 intact National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) teams completed surveys (e.g., social identity) and reported the extent to which they would engage in risky behavior scenarios (e.g., drinking and driving). Then, researchers displayed ostensible responses that were manipulated to appear as though teammates reported high engagement in the risky behaviors. Finally, athletes again responded to the hypothetical scenarios and a conformity index was created. Results indicated that social identity, at both individual and group levels, positively predicted conformity- indicating that athletes with stronger social identities are more susceptible to peer influence. Although these findings highlight a pernicious aspect of social identity, they also provide insight into how group-level processes could be leveraged to prevent risky behaviors in student-athletes.",
author = "Graupensperger, {Scott A.} and Benson, {Alex J.} and Evans, {Michael Blair}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/jsep.2017-0339",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "117--127",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology",
issn = "0895-2779",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Everyone else is doing it : The association between social identity and susceptibility to peer influence in NCAA athletes. / Graupensperger, Scott A.; Benson, Alex J.; Evans, Michael Blair.

In: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.06.2018, p. 117-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyone else is doing it

T2 - The association between social identity and susceptibility to peer influence in NCAA athletes

AU - Graupensperger, Scott A.

AU - Benson, Alex J.

AU - Evans, Michael Blair

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - The authors examined athletes' conformity to teammates' risky behaviors through a performance-based manipulation paradigm. They hypothesized that athletes who strongly identified with their team would be at increased risk of conforming to teammates' behaviors. Athletes (N = 379) from 23 intact National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) teams completed surveys (e.g., social identity) and reported the extent to which they would engage in risky behavior scenarios (e.g., drinking and driving). Then, researchers displayed ostensible responses that were manipulated to appear as though teammates reported high engagement in the risky behaviors. Finally, athletes again responded to the hypothetical scenarios and a conformity index was created. Results indicated that social identity, at both individual and group levels, positively predicted conformity- indicating that athletes with stronger social identities are more susceptible to peer influence. Although these findings highlight a pernicious aspect of social identity, they also provide insight into how group-level processes could be leveraged to prevent risky behaviors in student-athletes.

AB - The authors examined athletes' conformity to teammates' risky behaviors through a performance-based manipulation paradigm. They hypothesized that athletes who strongly identified with their team would be at increased risk of conforming to teammates' behaviors. Athletes (N = 379) from 23 intact National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) teams completed surveys (e.g., social identity) and reported the extent to which they would engage in risky behavior scenarios (e.g., drinking and driving). Then, researchers displayed ostensible responses that were manipulated to appear as though teammates reported high engagement in the risky behaviors. Finally, athletes again responded to the hypothetical scenarios and a conformity index was created. Results indicated that social identity, at both individual and group levels, positively predicted conformity- indicating that athletes with stronger social identities are more susceptible to peer influence. Although these findings highlight a pernicious aspect of social identity, they also provide insight into how group-level processes could be leveraged to prevent risky behaviors in student-athletes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051122706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051122706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jsep.2017-0339

DO - 10.1123/jsep.2017-0339

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 117

EP - 127

JO - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

JF - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

SN - 0895-2779

IS - 3

ER -