Evidence against the involvement of ionically bound cell wall proteins in pea epicotyl growth.

M. A. Melan, D. J. Cosgrove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ionically bound cell wall proteins were extracted from 7 day old etiolated pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska) epicotyls with 3 molar LiCl. Polyclonal antiserum was raised in rabbits against the cell wall proteins. Growth assays showed that treatment of growing region segments (5-7 millimeters) of peas with either dialyzed serum, serum globulin fraction, affinity purified immunoglobulin, or papain-cleaved antibody fragments had no effect on growth. Immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed antibody binding to cell walls and penetration of the antibodies into the tissues. Western blot analysis, immunoassay results, and affinity chromatography utilizing Sepharose-bound antibodies confirmed recognition of the protein preparation by the antibodies. Experiments employing in vitro extension as a screening measure indicated no effect upon extension by antibodies, by 50 millimolar LiCl perfusion of the apoplast or by 3 molar LiCl extraction. Addition of cell wall protein to protease pretreated segments did not restore extension nor did addition of cell wall protein to untreated segments increase extension. It is concluded that, although evidence suggests that protein is responsible for the process of extension, the class(es) of proteins which are extracted from pea cell walls with 3 molar LiCl are probably not involved in this process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-474
Number of pages6
JournalPlant physiology
Volume86
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Genetics
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence against the involvement of ionically bound cell wall proteins in pea epicotyl growth.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this