Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters

Matteo Coronese, Francesco Lamperti, Klaus Keller, Francesca Chiaromonte, Andrea Roventini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of natural disasters. Does this translate into increased economic damages? To date, empirical assessments of damage trends have been inconclusive. Our study demonstrates a temporal increase in extreme damages, after controlling for a number of factors. We analyze event-level data using quantile regressions to capture patterns in the damage distribution (not just its mean) and find strong evidence of progressive rightward skewing and tail-fattening over time. While the effect of time on averages is hard to detect, effects on extreme damages are large, statistically significant, and growing with increasing percentiles. Our results are consistent with an upwardly curved, convex damage function, which is commonly assumed in climate-economics models. They are also robust to different specifications of control variables and time range considered and indicate that the risk of extreme damages has increased more in temperate areas than in tropical ones. We use simulations to show that underreporting bias in the data does not weaken our inferences; in fact, it may make them overly conservative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21450-21455
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume116
Issue number43
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 22 2019

Fingerprint

Disasters
Economics
Economic Models
Climate Change
Climate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

@article{c5c46b2e356d4af889190439cbe53a92,
title = "Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters",
abstract = "Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of natural disasters. Does this translate into increased economic damages? To date, empirical assessments of damage trends have been inconclusive. Our study demonstrates a temporal increase in extreme damages, after controlling for a number of factors. We analyze event-level data using quantile regressions to capture patterns in the damage distribution (not just its mean) and find strong evidence of progressive rightward skewing and tail-fattening over time. While the effect of time on averages is hard to detect, effects on extreme damages are large, statistically significant, and growing with increasing percentiles. Our results are consistent with an upwardly curved, convex damage function, which is commonly assumed in climate-economics models. They are also robust to different specifications of control variables and time range considered and indicate that the risk of extreme damages has increased more in temperate areas than in tropical ones. We use simulations to show that underreporting bias in the data does not weaken our inferences; in fact, it may make them overly conservative.",
author = "Matteo Coronese and Francesco Lamperti and Klaus Keller and Francesca Chiaromonte and Andrea Roventini",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1907826116",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "21450--21455",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "43",

}

Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters. / Coronese, Matteo; Lamperti, Francesco; Keller, Klaus; Chiaromonte, Francesca; Roventini, Andrea.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 116, No. 43, 22.10.2019, p. 21450-21455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters

AU - Coronese, Matteo

AU - Lamperti, Francesco

AU - Keller, Klaus

AU - Chiaromonte, Francesca

AU - Roventini, Andrea

PY - 2019/10/22

Y1 - 2019/10/22

N2 - Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of natural disasters. Does this translate into increased economic damages? To date, empirical assessments of damage trends have been inconclusive. Our study demonstrates a temporal increase in extreme damages, after controlling for a number of factors. We analyze event-level data using quantile regressions to capture patterns in the damage distribution (not just its mean) and find strong evidence of progressive rightward skewing and tail-fattening over time. While the effect of time on averages is hard to detect, effects on extreme damages are large, statistically significant, and growing with increasing percentiles. Our results are consistent with an upwardly curved, convex damage function, which is commonly assumed in climate-economics models. They are also robust to different specifications of control variables and time range considered and indicate that the risk of extreme damages has increased more in temperate areas than in tropical ones. We use simulations to show that underreporting bias in the data does not weaken our inferences; in fact, it may make them overly conservative.

AB - Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of natural disasters. Does this translate into increased economic damages? To date, empirical assessments of damage trends have been inconclusive. Our study demonstrates a temporal increase in extreme damages, after controlling for a number of factors. We analyze event-level data using quantile regressions to capture patterns in the damage distribution (not just its mean) and find strong evidence of progressive rightward skewing and tail-fattening over time. While the effect of time on averages is hard to detect, effects on extreme damages are large, statistically significant, and growing with increasing percentiles. Our results are consistent with an upwardly curved, convex damage function, which is commonly assumed in climate-economics models. They are also robust to different specifications of control variables and time range considered and indicate that the risk of extreme damages has increased more in temperate areas than in tropical ones. We use simulations to show that underreporting bias in the data does not weaken our inferences; in fact, it may make them overly conservative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073732219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073732219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1907826116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1907826116

M3 - Article

C2 - 31591192

AN - SCOPUS:85073732219

VL - 116

SP - 21450

EP - 21455

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 43

ER -