Evidence for Two Hot-Jupiter Formation Paths

Benjamin E. Nelson, Eric B. Ford, Frederic A. Rasio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disk migration and high-eccentricity migration are two well-studied theories to explain the formation of hot Jupiters. The former predicts that these planets can migrate up until the planet-star Roche separation (aRoche) and the latter predicts they will tidally circularize at a minimum distance of 2 aRoche. Considering long-running radial velocity and transit surveys have identified a couple hundred hot Jupiters to date, we can revisit the classic question of hot-Jupiter formation in a data-driven manner. We approach this problem using data from several exoplanet surveys (radial velocity, Kepler, HAT, and WASP) allowing for either a single population or a mixture of populations associated with these formation channels, and applying a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model of truncated power laws of the form xγ-1 to constrain the population-level parameters of interest (e.g., location of inner edges, λ, mixture fractions). Within the limitations of our chosen models, we find that the current radial velocity and Kepler sample of hot Jupiters can be well explained with a single truncated power-law distribution with a lower cutoff near 2 aRoche, a result that still holds after a decade, and γ = -0.51+0.19 -0.19. However, the HAT and WASP data show evidence for multiple populations (Bayes factor ≈1021). We find that 15 +96 % reside in a component consistent with disk migration (γ = -0.04+0.53-1.27) and 85 +96 %in one consistent with high-eccentricity migration (γ = -1.38+0.32-0.47). We find no immediately strong connections with some observed host star properties and speculate on how future exoplanet surveys could improve upon hot-Jupiter population inference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106
JournalAstronomical Journal
Volume154
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Jupiter (planet)
Jupiter
radial velocity
extrasolar planets
eccentricity
planets
planet
stars
power law distribution
transit
inference
power law
cut-off

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Nelson, Benjamin E. ; Ford, Eric B. ; Rasio, Frederic A. / Evidence for Two Hot-Jupiter Formation Paths. In: Astronomical Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 154, No. 3.
@article{aae3f87a409e4c97b585d84eb18911d4,
title = "Evidence for Two Hot-Jupiter Formation Paths",
abstract = "Disk migration and high-eccentricity migration are two well-studied theories to explain the formation of hot Jupiters. The former predicts that these planets can migrate up until the planet-star Roche separation (aRoche) and the latter predicts they will tidally circularize at a minimum distance of 2 aRoche. Considering long-running radial velocity and transit surveys have identified a couple hundred hot Jupiters to date, we can revisit the classic question of hot-Jupiter formation in a data-driven manner. We approach this problem using data from several exoplanet surveys (radial velocity, Kepler, HAT, and WASP) allowing for either a single population or a mixture of populations associated with these formation channels, and applying a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model of truncated power laws of the form xγ-1 to constrain the population-level parameters of interest (e.g., location of inner edges, λ, mixture fractions). Within the limitations of our chosen models, we find that the current radial velocity and Kepler sample of hot Jupiters can be well explained with a single truncated power-law distribution with a lower cutoff near 2 aRoche, a result that still holds after a decade, and γ = -0.51+0.19 -0.19. However, the HAT and WASP data show evidence for multiple populations (Bayes factor ≈1021). We find that 15 +96 {\%} reside in a component consistent with disk migration (γ = -0.04+0.53-1.27) and 85 +96 {\%}in one consistent with high-eccentricity migration (γ = -1.38+0.32-0.47). We find no immediately strong connections with some observed host star properties and speculate on how future exoplanet surveys could improve upon hot-Jupiter population inference.",
author = "Nelson, {Benjamin E.} and Ford, {Eric B.} and Rasio, {Frederic A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3847/1538-3881/aa82b3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
journal = "Astronomical Journal",
issn = "0004-6256",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Evidence for Two Hot-Jupiter Formation Paths. / Nelson, Benjamin E.; Ford, Eric B.; Rasio, Frederic A.

In: Astronomical Journal, Vol. 154, No. 3, 106, 09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for Two Hot-Jupiter Formation Paths

AU - Nelson, Benjamin E.

AU - Ford, Eric B.

AU - Rasio, Frederic A.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - Disk migration and high-eccentricity migration are two well-studied theories to explain the formation of hot Jupiters. The former predicts that these planets can migrate up until the planet-star Roche separation (aRoche) and the latter predicts they will tidally circularize at a minimum distance of 2 aRoche. Considering long-running radial velocity and transit surveys have identified a couple hundred hot Jupiters to date, we can revisit the classic question of hot-Jupiter formation in a data-driven manner. We approach this problem using data from several exoplanet surveys (radial velocity, Kepler, HAT, and WASP) allowing for either a single population or a mixture of populations associated with these formation channels, and applying a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model of truncated power laws of the form xγ-1 to constrain the population-level parameters of interest (e.g., location of inner edges, λ, mixture fractions). Within the limitations of our chosen models, we find that the current radial velocity and Kepler sample of hot Jupiters can be well explained with a single truncated power-law distribution with a lower cutoff near 2 aRoche, a result that still holds after a decade, and γ = -0.51+0.19 -0.19. However, the HAT and WASP data show evidence for multiple populations (Bayes factor ≈1021). We find that 15 +96 % reside in a component consistent with disk migration (γ = -0.04+0.53-1.27) and 85 +96 %in one consistent with high-eccentricity migration (γ = -1.38+0.32-0.47). We find no immediately strong connections with some observed host star properties and speculate on how future exoplanet surveys could improve upon hot-Jupiter population inference.

AB - Disk migration and high-eccentricity migration are two well-studied theories to explain the formation of hot Jupiters. The former predicts that these planets can migrate up until the planet-star Roche separation (aRoche) and the latter predicts they will tidally circularize at a minimum distance of 2 aRoche. Considering long-running radial velocity and transit surveys have identified a couple hundred hot Jupiters to date, we can revisit the classic question of hot-Jupiter formation in a data-driven manner. We approach this problem using data from several exoplanet surveys (radial velocity, Kepler, HAT, and WASP) allowing for either a single population or a mixture of populations associated with these formation channels, and applying a hierarchical Bayesian mixture model of truncated power laws of the form xγ-1 to constrain the population-level parameters of interest (e.g., location of inner edges, λ, mixture fractions). Within the limitations of our chosen models, we find that the current radial velocity and Kepler sample of hot Jupiters can be well explained with a single truncated power-law distribution with a lower cutoff near 2 aRoche, a result that still holds after a decade, and γ = -0.51+0.19 -0.19. However, the HAT and WASP data show evidence for multiple populations (Bayes factor ≈1021). We find that 15 +96 % reside in a component consistent with disk migration (γ = -0.04+0.53-1.27) and 85 +96 %in one consistent with high-eccentricity migration (γ = -1.38+0.32-0.47). We find no immediately strong connections with some observed host star properties and speculate on how future exoplanet surveys could improve upon hot-Jupiter population inference.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029127991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029127991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3847/1538-3881/aa82b3

DO - 10.3847/1538-3881/aa82b3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85029127991

VL - 154

JO - Astronomical Journal

JF - Astronomical Journal

SN - 0004-6256

IS - 3

M1 - 106

ER -