Evidence of butchery and hominid activities at Torralba and Ambrona; an evaluation using microscopic techniques

Patty Lee Shipman, Jennie Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Torralba and Ambrona have been interpreted as butchery sites for many years, a contention recently challenged; natural death or carnivore activities are invoked as an alternative explanation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of bone surface replicas distinguishes among hominid-produced cutmarks, carnivore tooth scratches, and other types of bone damage. A sample of 102 replicas, comprising the most likely cutmarks on a combined sample of roughly 3000 fossils from Torralba and Ambrona, were scanned to determine the major agent of damage. Microscopically verified cutmarks are present, but rare, occurring in less than 1% of the bones in the combined sample. Carnivore tooth scratches are comparably rare. In contrast, evidence of sedimentary abrasion, which obliterates the diagnostic features of cutmarks, is present on nearly every bone from Torralba and Ambrona. It remains unresolved whether cutmarks were initially more common on these bones and were subsequently obliterated by abrasion, or whether the incidence of cutmarks was always low. These data demonstrate clearly that hominids and carnivores each damaged some bones at Torralba and Ambrona, but the frequency of each type of mark is too low to confirm strongly the interpretation of these sites as either butchery or carnivore remains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-474
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1983

Fingerprint

damages
evaluation
evidence
diagnostic
incidence
death
interpretation
Evaluation
Cut Marks
Butchery
Hominids
Carnivores
Abrasion
Teeth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

@article{aa1310f6e0f04da2aa25501b24803f60,
title = "Evidence of butchery and hominid activities at Torralba and Ambrona; an evaluation using microscopic techniques",
abstract = "Torralba and Ambrona have been interpreted as butchery sites for many years, a contention recently challenged; natural death or carnivore activities are invoked as an alternative explanation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of bone surface replicas distinguishes among hominid-produced cutmarks, carnivore tooth scratches, and other types of bone damage. A sample of 102 replicas, comprising the most likely cutmarks on a combined sample of roughly 3000 fossils from Torralba and Ambrona, were scanned to determine the major agent of damage. Microscopically verified cutmarks are present, but rare, occurring in less than 1{\%} of the bones in the combined sample. Carnivore tooth scratches are comparably rare. In contrast, evidence of sedimentary abrasion, which obliterates the diagnostic features of cutmarks, is present on nearly every bone from Torralba and Ambrona. It remains unresolved whether cutmarks were initially more common on these bones and were subsequently obliterated by abrasion, or whether the incidence of cutmarks was always low. These data demonstrate clearly that hominids and carnivores each damaged some bones at Torralba and Ambrona, but the frequency of each type of mark is too low to confirm strongly the interpretation of these sites as either butchery or carnivore remains.",
author = "Shipman, {Patty Lee} and Jennie Rose",
year = "1983",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0305-4403(83)90061-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "465--474",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
issn = "0305-4403",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Evidence of butchery and hominid activities at Torralba and Ambrona; an evaluation using microscopic techniques. / Shipman, Patty Lee; Rose, Jennie.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, 01.01.1983, p. 465-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence of butchery and hominid activities at Torralba and Ambrona; an evaluation using microscopic techniques

AU - Shipman, Patty Lee

AU - Rose, Jennie

PY - 1983/1/1

Y1 - 1983/1/1

N2 - Torralba and Ambrona have been interpreted as butchery sites for many years, a contention recently challenged; natural death or carnivore activities are invoked as an alternative explanation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of bone surface replicas distinguishes among hominid-produced cutmarks, carnivore tooth scratches, and other types of bone damage. A sample of 102 replicas, comprising the most likely cutmarks on a combined sample of roughly 3000 fossils from Torralba and Ambrona, were scanned to determine the major agent of damage. Microscopically verified cutmarks are present, but rare, occurring in less than 1% of the bones in the combined sample. Carnivore tooth scratches are comparably rare. In contrast, evidence of sedimentary abrasion, which obliterates the diagnostic features of cutmarks, is present on nearly every bone from Torralba and Ambrona. It remains unresolved whether cutmarks were initially more common on these bones and were subsequently obliterated by abrasion, or whether the incidence of cutmarks was always low. These data demonstrate clearly that hominids and carnivores each damaged some bones at Torralba and Ambrona, but the frequency of each type of mark is too low to confirm strongly the interpretation of these sites as either butchery or carnivore remains.

AB - Torralba and Ambrona have been interpreted as butchery sites for many years, a contention recently challenged; natural death or carnivore activities are invoked as an alternative explanation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of bone surface replicas distinguishes among hominid-produced cutmarks, carnivore tooth scratches, and other types of bone damage. A sample of 102 replicas, comprising the most likely cutmarks on a combined sample of roughly 3000 fossils from Torralba and Ambrona, were scanned to determine the major agent of damage. Microscopically verified cutmarks are present, but rare, occurring in less than 1% of the bones in the combined sample. Carnivore tooth scratches are comparably rare. In contrast, evidence of sedimentary abrasion, which obliterates the diagnostic features of cutmarks, is present on nearly every bone from Torralba and Ambrona. It remains unresolved whether cutmarks were initially more common on these bones and were subsequently obliterated by abrasion, or whether the incidence of cutmarks was always low. These data demonstrate clearly that hominids and carnivores each damaged some bones at Torralba and Ambrona, but the frequency of each type of mark is too low to confirm strongly the interpretation of these sites as either butchery or carnivore remains.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021059958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021059958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0305-4403(83)90061-4

DO - 10.1016/0305-4403(83)90061-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0021059958

VL - 10

SP - 465

EP - 474

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

SN - 0305-4403

IS - 5

ER -