Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness

L. Fortunato, M. Archetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The majority of human societies allow polygynous marriage, and the prevalence of this practice is readily understood in evolutionary terms. Why some societies prescribe monogamous marriage is however not clear: current evolutionary explanations - that social monogamy increases within-group co-operation, giving societies an advantage in competition with other groups - conflict with the historical and ethnographic evidence. We show that, within the framework of inclusive fitness theory, monogamous marriage can be viewed as the outcome of the strategic behaviour of males and females in the allocation of resources to the next generation. Where resources are transferred across generations, social monogamy can be advantageous if partitioning of resources among the offspring of multiple wives causes a depletion of their fitness value, and/or if females grant husbands higher fidelity in exchange for exclusive investment of resources in their offspring. This may explain why monogamous marriage prevailed among the historical societies of Eurasia: here, intensive agriculture led to scarcity of land, with depletion in the value of estates through partitioning among multiple heirs. Norms promoting high paternity were common among ancient societies in the region, and may have further facilitated the establishment of social monogamy. In line with the historical and ethnographic evidence, this suggests that monogamous marriage emerged in Eurasia following the adoption of intensive agriculture, as ownership of land became critical to productive and reproductive success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-156
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

inclusive fitness
marriage
monogamy
intensive agriculture
intensive farming
Eurasia
resource
partitioning
land ownership
paternity
resource allocation
reproductive success
ownership
fitness
society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

@article{3149324df7434e10babfd2bb4015289b,
title = "Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness",
abstract = "The majority of human societies allow polygynous marriage, and the prevalence of this practice is readily understood in evolutionary terms. Why some societies prescribe monogamous marriage is however not clear: current evolutionary explanations - that social monogamy increases within-group co-operation, giving societies an advantage in competition with other groups - conflict with the historical and ethnographic evidence. We show that, within the framework of inclusive fitness theory, monogamous marriage can be viewed as the outcome of the strategic behaviour of males and females in the allocation of resources to the next generation. Where resources are transferred across generations, social monogamy can be advantageous if partitioning of resources among the offspring of multiple wives causes a depletion of their fitness value, and/or if females grant husbands higher fidelity in exchange for exclusive investment of resources in their offspring. This may explain why monogamous marriage prevailed among the historical societies of Eurasia: here, intensive agriculture led to scarcity of land, with depletion in the value of estates through partitioning among multiple heirs. Norms promoting high paternity were common among ancient societies in the region, and may have further facilitated the establishment of social monogamy. In line with the historical and ethnographic evidence, this suggests that monogamous marriage emerged in Eurasia following the adoption of intensive agriculture, as ownership of land became critical to productive and reproductive success.",
author = "L. Fortunato and M. Archetti",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "149--156",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Biology",
issn = "1010-061X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness. / Fortunato, L.; Archetti, M.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 149-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of monogamous marriage by maximization of inclusive fitness

AU - Fortunato, L.

AU - Archetti, M.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The majority of human societies allow polygynous marriage, and the prevalence of this practice is readily understood in evolutionary terms. Why some societies prescribe monogamous marriage is however not clear: current evolutionary explanations - that social monogamy increases within-group co-operation, giving societies an advantage in competition with other groups - conflict with the historical and ethnographic evidence. We show that, within the framework of inclusive fitness theory, monogamous marriage can be viewed as the outcome of the strategic behaviour of males and females in the allocation of resources to the next generation. Where resources are transferred across generations, social monogamy can be advantageous if partitioning of resources among the offspring of multiple wives causes a depletion of their fitness value, and/or if females grant husbands higher fidelity in exchange for exclusive investment of resources in their offspring. This may explain why monogamous marriage prevailed among the historical societies of Eurasia: here, intensive agriculture led to scarcity of land, with depletion in the value of estates through partitioning among multiple heirs. Norms promoting high paternity were common among ancient societies in the region, and may have further facilitated the establishment of social monogamy. In line with the historical and ethnographic evidence, this suggests that monogamous marriage emerged in Eurasia following the adoption of intensive agriculture, as ownership of land became critical to productive and reproductive success.

AB - The majority of human societies allow polygynous marriage, and the prevalence of this practice is readily understood in evolutionary terms. Why some societies prescribe monogamous marriage is however not clear: current evolutionary explanations - that social monogamy increases within-group co-operation, giving societies an advantage in competition with other groups - conflict with the historical and ethnographic evidence. We show that, within the framework of inclusive fitness theory, monogamous marriage can be viewed as the outcome of the strategic behaviour of males and females in the allocation of resources to the next generation. Where resources are transferred across generations, social monogamy can be advantageous if partitioning of resources among the offspring of multiple wives causes a depletion of their fitness value, and/or if females grant husbands higher fidelity in exchange for exclusive investment of resources in their offspring. This may explain why monogamous marriage prevailed among the historical societies of Eurasia: here, intensive agriculture led to scarcity of land, with depletion in the value of estates through partitioning among multiple heirs. Norms promoting high paternity were common among ancient societies in the region, and may have further facilitated the establishment of social monogamy. In line with the historical and ethnographic evidence, this suggests that monogamous marriage emerged in Eurasia following the adoption of intensive agriculture, as ownership of land became critical to productive and reproductive success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72449201693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72449201693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01884.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20069721

AN - SCOPUS:72449201693

VL - 23

SP - 149

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Biology

SN - 1010-061X

IS - 1

ER -