Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research

Implications for learning and instruction

Pricilla Karen Murphy, Patricia A. Alexander, Jeffrey A. Greene, Maeghan N. Hennessey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently, research on the role of epistemic beliefs in conceptual change has increased dramatically. The focus of that research has largely been on students' beliefs about knowledge and knowing; that is, how one understands what it means to know. In this article, we consider the characteristics of knowledge and knowing (i. e., epistemic frames) manifest in conceptual change investigations conducted by contemporary researchers. To accomplish this purpose, we took several steps. First, we reviewed philosophical writings pertaining to epistemology and epistemological beliefs, selected prominent stances toward epistemology (i. e., epistemic frames), and delineated the defining features of each (e. g., stances regarding knowledge or justification of knowledge). Then, to illustrate how these philosophical frames might translate into psychological research, we constructed prototypic conceptual change studies for each frame. Finally, we searched the conceptual change literature for studies manifesting evidence of the various epistemic frames. We conclude with potential applications of the epistemic frames in future conceptual change research and educational practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-486
Number of pages12
JournalAsia Pacific Education Review
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

instruction
epistemology
learning
research practice
educational practice
evidence
student
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Murphy, Pricilla Karen ; Alexander, Patricia A. ; Greene, Jeffrey A. ; Hennessey, Maeghan N. / Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research : Implications for learning and instruction. In: Asia Pacific Education Review. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 475-486.
@article{8f5c6207d9844bff9a13dbad3fdbd20c,
title = "Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research: Implications for learning and instruction",
abstract = "Recently, research on the role of epistemic beliefs in conceptual change has increased dramatically. The focus of that research has largely been on students' beliefs about knowledge and knowing; that is, how one understands what it means to know. In this article, we consider the characteristics of knowledge and knowing (i. e., epistemic frames) manifest in conceptual change investigations conducted by contemporary researchers. To accomplish this purpose, we took several steps. First, we reviewed philosophical writings pertaining to epistemology and epistemological beliefs, selected prominent stances toward epistemology (i. e., epistemic frames), and delineated the defining features of each (e. g., stances regarding knowledge or justification of knowledge). Then, to illustrate how these philosophical frames might translate into psychological research, we constructed prototypic conceptual change studies for each frame. Finally, we searched the conceptual change literature for studies manifesting evidence of the various epistemic frames. We conclude with potential applications of the epistemic frames in future conceptual change research and educational practice.",
author = "Murphy, {Pricilla Karen} and Alexander, {Patricia A.} and Greene, {Jeffrey A.} and Hennessey, {Maeghan N.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12564-011-9199-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "475--486",
journal = "Asia Pacific Education Review",
issn = "1598-1037",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research : Implications for learning and instruction. / Murphy, Pricilla Karen; Alexander, Patricia A.; Greene, Jeffrey A.; Hennessey, Maeghan N.

In: Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.01.2012, p. 475-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining epistemic frames in conceptual change research

T2 - Implications for learning and instruction

AU - Murphy, Pricilla Karen

AU - Alexander, Patricia A.

AU - Greene, Jeffrey A.

AU - Hennessey, Maeghan N.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Recently, research on the role of epistemic beliefs in conceptual change has increased dramatically. The focus of that research has largely been on students' beliefs about knowledge and knowing; that is, how one understands what it means to know. In this article, we consider the characteristics of knowledge and knowing (i. e., epistemic frames) manifest in conceptual change investigations conducted by contemporary researchers. To accomplish this purpose, we took several steps. First, we reviewed philosophical writings pertaining to epistemology and epistemological beliefs, selected prominent stances toward epistemology (i. e., epistemic frames), and delineated the defining features of each (e. g., stances regarding knowledge or justification of knowledge). Then, to illustrate how these philosophical frames might translate into psychological research, we constructed prototypic conceptual change studies for each frame. Finally, we searched the conceptual change literature for studies manifesting evidence of the various epistemic frames. We conclude with potential applications of the epistemic frames in future conceptual change research and educational practice.

AB - Recently, research on the role of epistemic beliefs in conceptual change has increased dramatically. The focus of that research has largely been on students' beliefs about knowledge and knowing; that is, how one understands what it means to know. In this article, we consider the characteristics of knowledge and knowing (i. e., epistemic frames) manifest in conceptual change investigations conducted by contemporary researchers. To accomplish this purpose, we took several steps. First, we reviewed philosophical writings pertaining to epistemology and epistemological beliefs, selected prominent stances toward epistemology (i. e., epistemic frames), and delineated the defining features of each (e. g., stances regarding knowledge or justification of knowledge). Then, to illustrate how these philosophical frames might translate into psychological research, we constructed prototypic conceptual change studies for each frame. Finally, we searched the conceptual change literature for studies manifesting evidence of the various epistemic frames. We conclude with potential applications of the epistemic frames in future conceptual change research and educational practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867031172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867031172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12564-011-9199-0

DO - 10.1007/s12564-011-9199-0

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 475

EP - 486

JO - Asia Pacific Education Review

JF - Asia Pacific Education Review

SN - 1598-1037

IS - 3

ER -