Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nationally, the rate of incarcerated women is at an all-time high [Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage; West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice]. Even with these significant increases women defendants remain much less likely to receive sentences of incarceration than male defendants. Considering the evidence showing that women are often sentenced less harshly than men, research continues to examine the cause of gender disparities in judicial sentencing decisions. This chapter will examine the research that contends that the cause of the gender disparity may not actually be due to gender leniency but rather judicial considerations of the risks and costs of punishing female versus male defendants due to different gender roles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPerceptions of Female Offenders
Subtitle of host publicationHow Stereotypes and Social Norms Affect Criminal Justice Responses
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages181-190
Number of pages10
Volume9781461458715
ISBN (Electronic)9781461458715
ISBN (Print)1461458706, 9781461458708
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

paternalism
gender
justice
cause
bulletin
prisoner
gender role
offender
statistics
offense
costs
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Pierce, M. B. (2013). Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration? In Perceptions of Female Offenders: How Stereotypes and Social Norms Affect Criminal Justice Responses (Vol. 9781461458715, pp. 181-190). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11
Pierce, Mari B. / Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision : Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration?. Perceptions of Female Offenders: How Stereotypes and Social Norms Affect Criminal Justice Responses. Vol. 9781461458715 Springer New York, 2013. pp. 181-190
@inbook{2f54db00e02b4a70aa1f6b53b01ef702,
title = "Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration?",
abstract = "Nationally, the rate of incarcerated women is at an all-time high [Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage; West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice]. Even with these significant increases women defendants remain much less likely to receive sentences of incarceration than male defendants. Considering the evidence showing that women are often sentenced less harshly than men, research continues to examine the cause of gender disparities in judicial sentencing decisions. This chapter will examine the research that contends that the cause of the gender disparity may not actually be due to gender leniency but rather judicial considerations of the risks and costs of punishing female versus male defendants due to different gender roles.",
author = "Pierce, {Mari B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1461458706",
volume = "9781461458715",
pages = "181--190",
booktitle = "Perceptions of Female Offenders",
publisher = "Springer New York",
address = "United States",

}

Pierce, MB 2013, Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration? in Perceptions of Female Offenders: How Stereotypes and Social Norms Affect Criminal Justice Responses. vol. 9781461458715, Springer New York, pp. 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11

Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision : Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration? / Pierce, Mari B.

Perceptions of Female Offenders: How Stereotypes and Social Norms Affect Criminal Justice Responses. Vol. 9781461458715 Springer New York, 2013. p. 181-190.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision

T2 - Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration?

AU - Pierce, Mari B.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Nationally, the rate of incarcerated women is at an all-time high [Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage; West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice]. Even with these significant increases women defendants remain much less likely to receive sentences of incarceration than male defendants. Considering the evidence showing that women are often sentenced less harshly than men, research continues to examine the cause of gender disparities in judicial sentencing decisions. This chapter will examine the research that contends that the cause of the gender disparity may not actually be due to gender leniency but rather judicial considerations of the risks and costs of punishing female versus male defendants due to different gender roles.

AB - Nationally, the rate of incarcerated women is at an all-time high [Chesney-Lind, M., & Pasko, L. (2012). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage; West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice]. Even with these significant increases women defendants remain much less likely to receive sentences of incarceration than male defendants. Considering the evidence showing that women are often sentenced less harshly than men, research continues to examine the cause of gender disparities in judicial sentencing decisions. This chapter will examine the research that contends that the cause of the gender disparity may not actually be due to gender leniency but rather judicial considerations of the risks and costs of punishing female versus male defendants due to different gender roles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949179031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949179031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84949179031

SN - 1461458706

SN - 9781461458708

VL - 9781461458715

SP - 181

EP - 190

BT - Perceptions of Female Offenders

PB - Springer New York

ER -

Pierce MB. Examining the impact of familial paternalism on the sentencing decision: Gender leniency or legitimate judicial consideration? In Perceptions of Female Offenders: How Stereotypes and Social Norms Affect Criminal Justice Responses. Vol. 9781461458715. Springer New York. 2013. p. 181-190 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5871-5_11