Examining the Types of Knowledge Claims Made in Design Research

Jordan Beck, Erik Stolterman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

While much has been written about designerly knowledge and designerly ways of knowing in the professions, less has been written about the production and presentation of knowledge in the design discipline. In the present paper, we examine the possibility that knowledge claims might be an effective way to distinguish the design discipline from other disciplines. We compare the kinds of knowledge claims made in journal publications from the natural sciences, social sciences, and design. And we find that natural and social science publications tend to make singular knowledge claims of similar kinds whereas design publications often contain multiple knowledge claims of different kinds. We raise possible explanations for this pattern and its implications for design research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-214
Number of pages16
JournalShe Ji
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

research planning
natural sciences
Natural sciences
Social sciences
knowledge
social science
profession
Design research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Beck, Jordan ; Stolterman, Erik. / Examining the Types of Knowledge Claims Made in Design Research. In: She Ji. 2016 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 199-214.
@article{196552b23da5450d8503915b57358ef0,
title = "Examining the Types of Knowledge Claims Made in Design Research",
abstract = "While much has been written about designerly knowledge and designerly ways of knowing in the professions, less has been written about the production and presentation of knowledge in the design discipline. In the present paper, we examine the possibility that knowledge claims might be an effective way to distinguish the design discipline from other disciplines. We compare the kinds of knowledge claims made in journal publications from the natural sciences, social sciences, and design. And we find that natural and social science publications tend to make singular knowledge claims of similar kinds whereas design publications often contain multiple knowledge claims of different kinds. We raise possible explanations for this pattern and its implications for design research.",
author = "Jordan Beck and Erik Stolterman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.sheji.2017.02.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "199--214",
journal = "She Ji",
issn = "2405-8726",
publisher = "Tongji University Press",
number = "3",

}

Examining the Types of Knowledge Claims Made in Design Research. / Beck, Jordan; Stolterman, Erik.

In: She Ji, Vol. 2, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 199-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Types of Knowledge Claims Made in Design Research

AU - Beck, Jordan

AU - Stolterman, Erik

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - While much has been written about designerly knowledge and designerly ways of knowing in the professions, less has been written about the production and presentation of knowledge in the design discipline. In the present paper, we examine the possibility that knowledge claims might be an effective way to distinguish the design discipline from other disciplines. We compare the kinds of knowledge claims made in journal publications from the natural sciences, social sciences, and design. And we find that natural and social science publications tend to make singular knowledge claims of similar kinds whereas design publications often contain multiple knowledge claims of different kinds. We raise possible explanations for this pattern and its implications for design research.

AB - While much has been written about designerly knowledge and designerly ways of knowing in the professions, less has been written about the production and presentation of knowledge in the design discipline. In the present paper, we examine the possibility that knowledge claims might be an effective way to distinguish the design discipline from other disciplines. We compare the kinds of knowledge claims made in journal publications from the natural sciences, social sciences, and design. And we find that natural and social science publications tend to make singular knowledge claims of similar kinds whereas design publications often contain multiple knowledge claims of different kinds. We raise possible explanations for this pattern and its implications for design research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059841774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059841774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sheji.2017.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.sheji.2017.02.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059841774

VL - 2

SP - 199

EP - 214

JO - She Ji

JF - She Ji

SN - 2405-8726

IS - 3

ER -