Executive Personality, Capability Cues, and Risk Taking: How Narcissistic CEOs React to Their Successes and Stumbles

Arijit Chatterjee, Donald C. Hambrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Scopus citations

Abstract

We adopt an interactionist logic to study the determinants of risk taking by chief executive officers (CEOs).We introduce the concept of "capability cues"-contextual signals that decision makers might reasonably interpret as indicators of their current level of overall ability-arguing that positive cues will induce boldness, while negative cues will induce timidity.Then, drawing from prior theory about how narcissists react to stimuli, we hypothesize that highly narcissistic CEOs will be relatively unresponsive to objective indicators of their performance; in contrast, highly narcissistic CEOs will be exceptionally emboldened by social praise (in the forms of media praise and media awards).We test our theory in two distinct studies, one of risky outlays by CEOs of publicly owned U.S.companies from 1992 to 2006, and a second of acquisition premiums paid by CEOs of a sample of U.S.acquiring firms, 2001-2008.Our analyses show that capability cues generally influence executive risk taking, but highly narcissistic CEOs are much less responsive to recent objective performance than their less narcissistic peers; in contrast, highly narcissistic CEOs are especially bolstered by social praise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-237
Number of pages36
JournalAdministrative science quarterly
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Executive Personality, Capability Cues, and Risk Taking: How Narcissistic CEOs React to Their Successes and Stumbles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this