Experience With the Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum

Results of the Resident and Faculty Survey

Nahush A. Mokadam, James I. Fann, George L. Hicks, Jonathan C. Nesbitt, Harold M. Burkhart, John Conte, Daniel N. Coore, Paul S. Ramphal, K. Robert Shen, Jennifer D. Walker, Richard H. Feins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was developed at 8 institutions from 2010 to 2013. A total of 27 residents were trained by 18 faculty members. A survey was conducted to gain insight into the initial experience. Methods Residents and faculty were sent a 72- and 68-question survey, respectively. In addition to demographic information, participants reported their view of the overall impact of the curriculum. Focused investigation into each of the 6 modules was obtained. Participants evaluated the value of the specific simulators used. Institutional biases regarding implementation of the curriculum were evaluated. Results Twenty (74%) residents and 14 (78%) faculty responded. The majority (70%) of residents completed this training in their first and second year of traditional-track programs. The modules were well regarded with no respondents having an unfavorable view. Both residents and faculty found low, moderate, and high fidelity simulators to be extremely useful, with particular emphasis on utility of high fidelity components. The vast majority of residents (85%) and faculty (100%) felt more comfortable in the resident skill set and performance in the operating room. Simulation of rare adverse events allowed for development of multidisciplinary teams to address them. At most institutions, the conduct of this curriculum took precedence over clinical obligations (64%). Conclusions The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was implemented with robust adoption among the investigating centers. Both residents and faculty viewed the modules favorably. Using this curriculum, participants indicated an improvement in resident technical skills and were enthusiastic about training in adverse events and crisis management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-328
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Thoracic Surgery
Operating Rooms
Surveys and Questionnaires
Demography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Mokadam, Nahush A. ; Fann, James I. ; Hicks, George L. ; Nesbitt, Jonathan C. ; Burkhart, Harold M. ; Conte, John ; Coore, Daniel N. ; Ramphal, Paul S. ; Shen, K. Robert ; Walker, Jennifer D. ; Feins, Richard H. / Experience With the Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum : Results of the Resident and Faculty Survey. In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 322-328.
@article{227c2d64f8dc408481388b1a0848f894,
title = "Experience With the Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum: Results of the Resident and Faculty Survey",
abstract = "Background The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was developed at 8 institutions from 2010 to 2013. A total of 27 residents were trained by 18 faculty members. A survey was conducted to gain insight into the initial experience. Methods Residents and faculty were sent a 72- and 68-question survey, respectively. In addition to demographic information, participants reported their view of the overall impact of the curriculum. Focused investigation into each of the 6 modules was obtained. Participants evaluated the value of the specific simulators used. Institutional biases regarding implementation of the curriculum were evaluated. Results Twenty (74{\%}) residents and 14 (78{\%}) faculty responded. The majority (70{\%}) of residents completed this training in their first and second year of traditional-track programs. The modules were well regarded with no respondents having an unfavorable view. Both residents and faculty found low, moderate, and high fidelity simulators to be extremely useful, with particular emphasis on utility of high fidelity components. The vast majority of residents (85{\%}) and faculty (100{\%}) felt more comfortable in the resident skill set and performance in the operating room. Simulation of rare adverse events allowed for development of multidisciplinary teams to address them. At most institutions, the conduct of this curriculum took precedence over clinical obligations (64{\%}). Conclusions The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was implemented with robust adoption among the investigating centers. Both residents and faculty viewed the modules favorably. Using this curriculum, participants indicated an improvement in resident technical skills and were enthusiastic about training in adverse events and crisis management.",
author = "Mokadam, {Nahush A.} and Fann, {James I.} and Hicks, {George L.} and Nesbitt, {Jonathan C.} and Burkhart, {Harold M.} and John Conte and Coore, {Daniel N.} and Ramphal, {Paul S.} and Shen, {K. Robert} and Walker, {Jennifer D.} and Feins, {Richard H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "322--328",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

Mokadam, NA, Fann, JI, Hicks, GL, Nesbitt, JC, Burkhart, HM, Conte, J, Coore, DN, Ramphal, PS, Shen, KR, Walker, JD & Feins, RH 2017, 'Experience With the Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum: Results of the Resident and Faculty Survey', Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 322-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.074

Experience With the Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum : Results of the Resident and Faculty Survey. / Mokadam, Nahush A.; Fann, James I.; Hicks, George L.; Nesbitt, Jonathan C.; Burkhart, Harold M.; Conte, John; Coore, Daniel N.; Ramphal, Paul S.; Shen, K. Robert; Walker, Jennifer D.; Feins, Richard H.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 103, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 322-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experience With the Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum

T2 - Results of the Resident and Faculty Survey

AU - Mokadam, Nahush A.

AU - Fann, James I.

AU - Hicks, George L.

AU - Nesbitt, Jonathan C.

AU - Burkhart, Harold M.

AU - Conte, John

AU - Coore, Daniel N.

AU - Ramphal, Paul S.

AU - Shen, K. Robert

AU - Walker, Jennifer D.

AU - Feins, Richard H.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was developed at 8 institutions from 2010 to 2013. A total of 27 residents were trained by 18 faculty members. A survey was conducted to gain insight into the initial experience. Methods Residents and faculty were sent a 72- and 68-question survey, respectively. In addition to demographic information, participants reported their view of the overall impact of the curriculum. Focused investigation into each of the 6 modules was obtained. Participants evaluated the value of the specific simulators used. Institutional biases regarding implementation of the curriculum were evaluated. Results Twenty (74%) residents and 14 (78%) faculty responded. The majority (70%) of residents completed this training in their first and second year of traditional-track programs. The modules were well regarded with no respondents having an unfavorable view. Both residents and faculty found low, moderate, and high fidelity simulators to be extremely useful, with particular emphasis on utility of high fidelity components. The vast majority of residents (85%) and faculty (100%) felt more comfortable in the resident skill set and performance in the operating room. Simulation of rare adverse events allowed for development of multidisciplinary teams to address them. At most institutions, the conduct of this curriculum took precedence over clinical obligations (64%). Conclusions The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was implemented with robust adoption among the investigating centers. Both residents and faculty viewed the modules favorably. Using this curriculum, participants indicated an improvement in resident technical skills and were enthusiastic about training in adverse events and crisis management.

AB - Background The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was developed at 8 institutions from 2010 to 2013. A total of 27 residents were trained by 18 faculty members. A survey was conducted to gain insight into the initial experience. Methods Residents and faculty were sent a 72- and 68-question survey, respectively. In addition to demographic information, participants reported their view of the overall impact of the curriculum. Focused investigation into each of the 6 modules was obtained. Participants evaluated the value of the specific simulators used. Institutional biases regarding implementation of the curriculum were evaluated. Results Twenty (74%) residents and 14 (78%) faculty responded. The majority (70%) of residents completed this training in their first and second year of traditional-track programs. The modules were well regarded with no respondents having an unfavorable view. Both residents and faculty found low, moderate, and high fidelity simulators to be extremely useful, with particular emphasis on utility of high fidelity components. The vast majority of residents (85%) and faculty (100%) felt more comfortable in the resident skill set and performance in the operating room. Simulation of rare adverse events allowed for development of multidisciplinary teams to address them. At most institutions, the conduct of this curriculum took precedence over clinical obligations (64%). Conclusions The Cardiac Surgery Simulation Curriculum was implemented with robust adoption among the investigating centers. Both residents and faculty viewed the modules favorably. Using this curriculum, participants indicated an improvement in resident technical skills and were enthusiastic about training in adverse events and crisis management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002935568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002935568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.074

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.074

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 322

EP - 328

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 1

ER -