Experiment and predictions of strain and stress based failure limits for advanced high strength steel0

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Strain based failure measurements are traditionally very popular and implemented to construct the failure limits. The predictions of these measurements through various models were compared and agreed for the conventional steels. Whereas continuous demand on the reduction of the vehicle mass while maintaining comfort and passenger safety for current and future vehicles car manufacturers are attracted to a newly developed advanced high strength steel. These steels that promises high strength and enhanced ductility were produce to reduce the impact of fuel usage by balancing the above demands. However while implementing these steels many challenges were faced by manufacturers and tool designers. One of the challenges is to predict the forming limit diagram through the conventional strain based models. In this paper experiments were performed on Dual Phase and Transformed Induced Plasticity steels to plot the forming limit diagram and further compared with the conventional strain based models. It was observed that strain based model under predicts the failure whereas stress based models are the best agreement with experiments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-267
Number of pages7
JournalMaterials Today: Proceedings
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Steel
Experiments
High strength steel
Plasticity
Ductility
Railroad cars

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

@article{16a3a182dc2e4721a14eb8c045527f8d,
title = "Experiment and predictions of strain and stress based failure limits for advanced high strength steel0",
abstract = "Strain based failure measurements are traditionally very popular and implemented to construct the failure limits. The predictions of these measurements through various models were compared and agreed for the conventional steels. Whereas continuous demand on the reduction of the vehicle mass while maintaining comfort and passenger safety for current and future vehicles car manufacturers are attracted to a newly developed advanced high strength steel. These steels that promises high strength and enhanced ductility were produce to reduce the impact of fuel usage by balancing the above demands. However while implementing these steels many challenges were faced by manufacturers and tool designers. One of the challenges is to predict the forming limit diagram through the conventional strain based models. In this paper experiments were performed on Dual Phase and Transformed Induced Plasticity steels to plot the forming limit diagram and further compared with the conventional strain based models. It was observed that strain based model under predicts the failure whereas stress based models are the best agreement with experiments.",
author = "Nikhare, {Chetan P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.081",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "261--267",
journal = "Materials Today: Proceedings",
issn = "2214-7853",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Experiment and predictions of strain and stress based failure limits for advanced high strength steel0. / Nikhare, Chetan P.

In: Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 261-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experiment and predictions of strain and stress based failure limits for advanced high strength steel0

AU - Nikhare, Chetan P.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Strain based failure measurements are traditionally very popular and implemented to construct the failure limits. The predictions of these measurements through various models were compared and agreed for the conventional steels. Whereas continuous demand on the reduction of the vehicle mass while maintaining comfort and passenger safety for current and future vehicles car manufacturers are attracted to a newly developed advanced high strength steel. These steels that promises high strength and enhanced ductility were produce to reduce the impact of fuel usage by balancing the above demands. However while implementing these steels many challenges were faced by manufacturers and tool designers. One of the challenges is to predict the forming limit diagram through the conventional strain based models. In this paper experiments were performed on Dual Phase and Transformed Induced Plasticity steels to plot the forming limit diagram and further compared with the conventional strain based models. It was observed that strain based model under predicts the failure whereas stress based models are the best agreement with experiments.

AB - Strain based failure measurements are traditionally very popular and implemented to construct the failure limits. The predictions of these measurements through various models were compared and agreed for the conventional steels. Whereas continuous demand on the reduction of the vehicle mass while maintaining comfort and passenger safety for current and future vehicles car manufacturers are attracted to a newly developed advanced high strength steel. These steels that promises high strength and enhanced ductility were produce to reduce the impact of fuel usage by balancing the above demands. However while implementing these steels many challenges were faced by manufacturers and tool designers. One of the challenges is to predict the forming limit diagram through the conventional strain based models. In this paper experiments were performed on Dual Phase and Transformed Induced Plasticity steels to plot the forming limit diagram and further compared with the conventional strain based models. It was observed that strain based model under predicts the failure whereas stress based models are the best agreement with experiments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041361626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041361626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.081

DO - 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.081

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041361626

VL - 5

SP - 261

EP - 267

JO - Materials Today: Proceedings

JF - Materials Today: Proceedings

SN - 2214-7853

IS - 1

ER -