Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: Importance of pressure recovery

Russell S. Heinrich, Arnold Anthony Fontaine, Randall Y. Grimes, Aniket Sidhaye, Serena Yang, Kristin E. Moore, Robert A. Levine, Ajit P. Yoganathan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current methods for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis depend primarily on measures of maximum systolic pressure drop at the aortic valve orifice and related calculations such as valve area. It is becoming increasingly obvious, however, that the impact of the obstruction on the left ventricle is equally important in assessing its severity and could potentially be influenced by geometric factors of the valve, causing variable degrees of downstream pressure recovery. The goal of this study was to develop a method for measuring fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic stenosis that could then be directly related to the hemodynamic load placed on the left ventricle. A control volume form of conservation of energy was theoretically analyzed and modified for application to aortic valve stenosis measurements. In vitro physiological pulsatile flow experiments were conducted with different types of aortic stenosis models, including a venturi meter, a nozzle, and 21-mm Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valves. The energy loss created by each model was measured for a wide range of experimental conditions, simulating physiological variation. In all cases, there was more energy lost for the nozzle (mean = 0.27 J) than for any other model for a given stroke volume. The two prosthetic valves generated approximately the same energy losses (mean = 0.18 J), which were not statistically different, whereas the venturi meter had the lowest energy loss for all conditions (mean = 0.037 J). Energy loss correlated poorly with orifice pressure drop (r2 = 0.34) but correlated well with recovered pressure drop (r2 = 0.94). However, when the valves were considered separately, orifice and recovered pressure drop were both strongly correlated with energy loss (r2 = 0.99, 0.96). The results show that recovered pressure drop, not orifice pressure drop, is directly related to the energy loss that determines pump work and therefore is a more accurate measure of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-694
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Biomedical Engineering
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Energy dissipation
Pressure drop
Recovery
Fluids
Orifices
Hemodynamics
Nozzles
Pulsatile flow
Prosthetics
Conservation
Pumps
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Heinrich, Russell S. ; Fontaine, Arnold Anthony ; Grimes, Randall Y. ; Sidhaye, Aniket ; Yang, Serena ; Moore, Kristin E. ; Levine, Robert A. ; Yoganathan, Ajit P. / Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis : Importance of pressure recovery. In: Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 1996 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 685-694.
@article{bd5c012cf0834d19b0f3279042f6cf03,
title = "Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: Importance of pressure recovery",
abstract = "Current methods for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis depend primarily on measures of maximum systolic pressure drop at the aortic valve orifice and related calculations such as valve area. It is becoming increasingly obvious, however, that the impact of the obstruction on the left ventricle is equally important in assessing its severity and could potentially be influenced by geometric factors of the valve, causing variable degrees of downstream pressure recovery. The goal of this study was to develop a method for measuring fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic stenosis that could then be directly related to the hemodynamic load placed on the left ventricle. A control volume form of conservation of energy was theoretically analyzed and modified for application to aortic valve stenosis measurements. In vitro physiological pulsatile flow experiments were conducted with different types of aortic stenosis models, including a venturi meter, a nozzle, and 21-mm Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valves. The energy loss created by each model was measured for a wide range of experimental conditions, simulating physiological variation. In all cases, there was more energy lost for the nozzle (mean = 0.27 J) than for any other model for a given stroke volume. The two prosthetic valves generated approximately the same energy losses (mean = 0.18 J), which were not statistically different, whereas the venturi meter had the lowest energy loss for all conditions (mean = 0.037 J). Energy loss correlated poorly with orifice pressure drop (r2 = 0.34) but correlated well with recovered pressure drop (r2 = 0.94). However, when the valves were considered separately, orifice and recovered pressure drop were both strongly correlated with energy loss (r2 = 0.99, 0.96). The results show that recovered pressure drop, not orifice pressure drop, is directly related to the energy loss that determines pump work and therefore is a more accurate measure of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis.",
author = "Heinrich, {Russell S.} and Fontaine, {Arnold Anthony} and Grimes, {Randall Y.} and Aniket Sidhaye and Serena Yang and Moore, {Kristin E.} and Levine, {Robert A.} and Yoganathan, {Ajit P.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02684181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "685--694",
journal = "Annals of Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "0090-6964",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis : Importance of pressure recovery. / Heinrich, Russell S.; Fontaine, Arnold Anthony; Grimes, Randall Y.; Sidhaye, Aniket; Yang, Serena; Moore, Kristin E.; Levine, Robert A.; Yoganathan, Ajit P.

In: Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.01.1996, p. 685-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis

T2 - Importance of pressure recovery

AU - Heinrich, Russell S.

AU - Fontaine, Arnold Anthony

AU - Grimes, Randall Y.

AU - Sidhaye, Aniket

AU - Yang, Serena

AU - Moore, Kristin E.

AU - Levine, Robert A.

AU - Yoganathan, Ajit P.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Current methods for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis depend primarily on measures of maximum systolic pressure drop at the aortic valve orifice and related calculations such as valve area. It is becoming increasingly obvious, however, that the impact of the obstruction on the left ventricle is equally important in assessing its severity and could potentially be influenced by geometric factors of the valve, causing variable degrees of downstream pressure recovery. The goal of this study was to develop a method for measuring fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic stenosis that could then be directly related to the hemodynamic load placed on the left ventricle. A control volume form of conservation of energy was theoretically analyzed and modified for application to aortic valve stenosis measurements. In vitro physiological pulsatile flow experiments were conducted with different types of aortic stenosis models, including a venturi meter, a nozzle, and 21-mm Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valves. The energy loss created by each model was measured for a wide range of experimental conditions, simulating physiological variation. In all cases, there was more energy lost for the nozzle (mean = 0.27 J) than for any other model for a given stroke volume. The two prosthetic valves generated approximately the same energy losses (mean = 0.18 J), which were not statistically different, whereas the venturi meter had the lowest energy loss for all conditions (mean = 0.037 J). Energy loss correlated poorly with orifice pressure drop (r2 = 0.34) but correlated well with recovered pressure drop (r2 = 0.94). However, when the valves were considered separately, orifice and recovered pressure drop were both strongly correlated with energy loss (r2 = 0.99, 0.96). The results show that recovered pressure drop, not orifice pressure drop, is directly related to the energy loss that determines pump work and therefore is a more accurate measure of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis.

AB - Current methods for assessing the severity of aortic stenosis depend primarily on measures of maximum systolic pressure drop at the aortic valve orifice and related calculations such as valve area. It is becoming increasingly obvious, however, that the impact of the obstruction on the left ventricle is equally important in assessing its severity and could potentially be influenced by geometric factors of the valve, causing variable degrees of downstream pressure recovery. The goal of this study was to develop a method for measuring fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic stenosis that could then be directly related to the hemodynamic load placed on the left ventricle. A control volume form of conservation of energy was theoretically analyzed and modified for application to aortic valve stenosis measurements. In vitro physiological pulsatile flow experiments were conducted with different types of aortic stenosis models, including a venturi meter, a nozzle, and 21-mm Medtronic-Hall tilting disc and St. Jude bileaflet mechanical valves. The energy loss created by each model was measured for a wide range of experimental conditions, simulating physiological variation. In all cases, there was more energy lost for the nozzle (mean = 0.27 J) than for any other model for a given stroke volume. The two prosthetic valves generated approximately the same energy losses (mean = 0.18 J), which were not statistically different, whereas the venturi meter had the lowest energy loss for all conditions (mean = 0.037 J). Energy loss correlated poorly with orifice pressure drop (r2 = 0.34) but correlated well with recovered pressure drop (r2 = 0.94). However, when the valves were considered separately, orifice and recovered pressure drop were both strongly correlated with energy loss (r2 = 0.99, 0.96). The results show that recovered pressure drop, not orifice pressure drop, is directly related to the energy loss that determines pump work and therefore is a more accurate measure of the hemodynamic significance of aortic stenosis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030297230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030297230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02684181

DO - 10.1007/BF02684181

M3 - Article

C2 - 8923988

AN - SCOPUS:0030297230

VL - 24

SP - 685

EP - 694

JO - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

JF - Annals of Biomedical Engineering

SN - 0090-6964

IS - 6

ER -