Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger

David Saltzman, Michael Bichnevicius, Stephen P. Lynch, Timothy William Simpson, Edward William Reutzel, Corey Dickman, Richard Martukanitz

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This study compared the performance of both baseline and enhanced traditionally built heat exchangers (aircraft oil coolers), to both baseline and enhanced additively manufactured (AM) heat exchangers of similar geometry. Three dimensional (3D) X-ray computed tomography scans were performed on the baseline traditionally built heat exchanger in order to develop a solid model for AM fabrication using a laser-based powder bed fusion process with AlSi10Mg powder. Two AM heat exchanger geometries were constructed to replicate the baseline traditionally built geometry, with one AM heat exchanger containing additional small air-side enhancement features. The air-side pressure drop for the AM heat exchangers was double that of the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Heat transfer was increased by about 10 percent for the baseline AM and by 14 percent for the enhanced AM heat exchanger when compared to the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Both of the AM heat exchangers performed as well as the enhanced traditionally built model, but both had a higher pressure drop. Ongoing research seeks to ascertain the specific causes of the increased pressure drop and improved heat transfer, in order to provide a foundation for enhancement of future AM-built heat exchanger designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.
ISBN (Electronic)9781624104473
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Event55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting - Grapevine, United States
Duration: Jan 9 2017Jan 13 2017

Other

Other55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
CountryUnited States
CityGrapevine
Period1/9/171/13/17

Fingerprint

Heat exchangers
Aircraft
Pressure drop
Geometry
Heat transfer
Powders
Air
Tomography
Fusion reactions
Fabrication
X rays
Lasers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Saltzman, D., Bichnevicius, M., Lynch, S. P., Simpson, T. W., Reutzel, E. W., Dickman, C., & Martukanitz, R. (2017). Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger. In AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting [AIAA 2017-0902] American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0902
Saltzman, David ; Bichnevicius, Michael ; Lynch, Stephen P. ; Simpson, Timothy William ; Reutzel, Edward William ; Dickman, Corey ; Martukanitz, Richard. / Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger. AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2017.
@inproceedings{7d4a5416d22146fd873131ba7e6e882a,
title = "Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger",
abstract = "This study compared the performance of both baseline and enhanced traditionally built heat exchangers (aircraft oil coolers), to both baseline and enhanced additively manufactured (AM) heat exchangers of similar geometry. Three dimensional (3D) X-ray computed tomography scans were performed on the baseline traditionally built heat exchanger in order to develop a solid model for AM fabrication using a laser-based powder bed fusion process with AlSi10Mg powder. Two AM heat exchanger geometries were constructed to replicate the baseline traditionally built geometry, with one AM heat exchanger containing additional small air-side enhancement features. The air-side pressure drop for the AM heat exchangers was double that of the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Heat transfer was increased by about 10 percent for the baseline AM and by 14 percent for the enhanced AM heat exchanger when compared to the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Both of the AM heat exchangers performed as well as the enhanced traditionally built model, but both had a higher pressure drop. Ongoing research seeks to ascertain the specific causes of the increased pressure drop and improved heat transfer, in order to provide a foundation for enhancement of future AM-built heat exchanger designs.",
author = "David Saltzman and Michael Bichnevicius and Lynch, {Stephen P.} and Simpson, {Timothy William} and Reutzel, {Edward William} and Corey Dickman and Richard Martukanitz",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/6.2017-0902",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.",

}

Saltzman, D, Bichnevicius, M, Lynch, SP, Simpson, TW, Reutzel, EW, Dickman, C & Martukanitz, R 2017, Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger. in AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting., AIAA 2017-0902, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, United States, 1/9/17. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0902

Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger. / Saltzman, David; Bichnevicius, Michael; Lynch, Stephen P.; Simpson, Timothy William; Reutzel, Edward William; Dickman, Corey; Martukanitz, Richard.

AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2017. AIAA 2017-0902.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger

AU - Saltzman, David

AU - Bichnevicius, Michael

AU - Lynch, Stephen P.

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

AU - Reutzel, Edward William

AU - Dickman, Corey

AU - Martukanitz, Richard

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This study compared the performance of both baseline and enhanced traditionally built heat exchangers (aircraft oil coolers), to both baseline and enhanced additively manufactured (AM) heat exchangers of similar geometry. Three dimensional (3D) X-ray computed tomography scans were performed on the baseline traditionally built heat exchanger in order to develop a solid model for AM fabrication using a laser-based powder bed fusion process with AlSi10Mg powder. Two AM heat exchanger geometries were constructed to replicate the baseline traditionally built geometry, with one AM heat exchanger containing additional small air-side enhancement features. The air-side pressure drop for the AM heat exchangers was double that of the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Heat transfer was increased by about 10 percent for the baseline AM and by 14 percent for the enhanced AM heat exchanger when compared to the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Both of the AM heat exchangers performed as well as the enhanced traditionally built model, but both had a higher pressure drop. Ongoing research seeks to ascertain the specific causes of the increased pressure drop and improved heat transfer, in order to provide a foundation for enhancement of future AM-built heat exchanger designs.

AB - This study compared the performance of both baseline and enhanced traditionally built heat exchangers (aircraft oil coolers), to both baseline and enhanced additively manufactured (AM) heat exchangers of similar geometry. Three dimensional (3D) X-ray computed tomography scans were performed on the baseline traditionally built heat exchanger in order to develop a solid model for AM fabrication using a laser-based powder bed fusion process with AlSi10Mg powder. Two AM heat exchanger geometries were constructed to replicate the baseline traditionally built geometry, with one AM heat exchanger containing additional small air-side enhancement features. The air-side pressure drop for the AM heat exchangers was double that of the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Heat transfer was increased by about 10 percent for the baseline AM and by 14 percent for the enhanced AM heat exchanger when compared to the traditionally built baseline heat exchanger. Both of the AM heat exchangers performed as well as the enhanced traditionally built model, but both had a higher pressure drop. Ongoing research seeks to ascertain the specific causes of the increased pressure drop and improved heat transfer, in order to provide a foundation for enhancement of future AM-built heat exchanger designs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017095489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017095489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/6.2017-0902

DO - 10.2514/6.2017-0902

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc.

ER -

Saltzman D, Bichnevicius M, Lynch SP, Simpson TW, Reutzel EW, Dickman C et al. Experimental comparison of a traditionally built versus additively manufactured aircraft heat exchanger. In AIAA SciTech Forum - 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. 2017. AIAA 2017-0902 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0902